- Immigration in Bhutan
The earliest surviving records of
Bhutan ’s history show thatTibet an influence already existed from the 6th century AD. KingSongtsen Gampo who ruled Tibet from AD 627-649 was responsible for the construction of Bhutan’s oldest survivingBuddhist temples, the Kyichhu Lhakhang inParo and the Jambay Lhakhang inBumthang . Settlement in Bhutan by people of Tibetan origin had happened by this time. The first reports of people of
Nepal ese origin in Bhutan was around 1620, whenShabdrung Ngawang Namgyal commissionedNewar craftsmen from the Kathmandu valley in Nepal to make a silver stupa to contain the ashes of his fatherTempa Nima .There are no citable references of any further movement of people from Nepal to Bhutan until the beginning of the 20th century. Bhutan's point of view
Settlement in Bhutan of people from Nepal happened for the first time in the early 20th century encouraged by
Bhutan House inKalimpong for the purpose of collecting taxes for Bhutan House. In the 1940s, theBritish Political Officer SirBasil Gould , was quoted as saying that when he warned Sir Raja Sonam Tobgye Dorji of Bhutan House of the potential danger of allowing so many ethnic Nepalese to settle in southern Bhutan, he replied that “since they were not registered subjects they could be evicted whenever the need arose” [Sunanda Datta Ray, page 51]Towards the end of the reign of the second King
Jigme Wangchuck , in the 1950s, the numbers of new immigrants had swelled causing tension between the King and the Dorji family in Bhutan House. Amnesty was given through a new Citizenship Act of 1958 for all those who could prove their presence in Bhutan for at least 10 years prior to 1958.From 1961 onward however, with
India n support, the government began planned developmental activities consisting of significant infrastructure development works. Not comfortable with India’s desire to bring in workers in large numbers from India, the government initially tried to prove its own capacity by insisting that the planned Thimphu-Phuntsholing highway be done with its own workforce. While it did succeed in this, completing the 182 km highway in just two years, the import of workers from India was inevitable. With most Bhutanese working self-employed as farmers, Bhutan lacked a ready supply of workers willing to take up the major infrastructure projects. This led eventually to the large-scale import of skilled and unskilled construction workers from India. These people were most of Nepali origin who were able to slowly settle down under the guise of the naturalized immigrants. With the pressures of the developmental activities, this trend remained unchecked or inadequately checked for many years. Immigration check posts and immigration offices were in fact established for the first time only after the 1990 problem.By the 1980s, the government had become acutely conscious not just of widespread illegal immigration of people of Nepali origin into Bhutan, but also of the total lack of integration even of long-term immigrants into the political and cultural mainstream of the country. Most of the immigrants knew very little of the culture of Bhutan and most could not understand any one of the local languages including
Dzongkha . In the rural areas they remained so 'Nepalese' in their culture they were indistinguishable from the Nepalese in Nepal itself. For its part, government officials had long ignored the situation assuming that most of these people who were most often observed in non-Bhutanese clothes were in fact non-Bhutanese visitors or residents. Perceiving this growing dichotomy as a threat to national unity, the Government promulgated directives in the 1980s that sought to preserve Bhutan's cultural identity as well as to formally embrace the citizens of other ethnic groups in a "one nation, one people" policy. While the intent of the policy was benign and inclusive, the government not totally unreasonably, implied that the 'culture' to be preserved would be that of the various northern Bhutanese groups. This policy therefore required citizens to wear the attire of the northern Bhutanese in public places and reinforced the status of Dzongkha as the national language. Nepali was discontinued as a subject in the schools thus bringing it at par with the status of the other languages of Bhutan, none of which are taught. Such policies were criticized at first by human rights groups as well as Bhutan's Nepalese economic migrant community, who perceived the policy to be directed against them.In 1985, the government passed a new "Citizenship Act" which clarified and attempted to enforce the 1958 "Citizenship Act" to control the flood of illegal immigration. From 1988 the government conducted its first real census exercise. The basis for the census findings was the 1958 'cut off' year, the year that the Nepali population had first received Bhutanese citizenship. Those individuals who could not provide proof of residency prior to 1958 were adjudged to be illegal immigrants.
Matters reached a climax in September 1990 after organized groups comprised of 10,000 or more ethnic Nepalis from the Indian side of the border, organized protest marches in different districts, burned down schools, stripped local government officials of their national attire which they burned publicly, carried out kidnappings and murders of other ethnic Nepalis who did not join their protests. Some of the organizers of the marches were arrested and detained. However the Bhutanese government later released most of them. Those with ties to the groups responsible for the murders and kidnappings were forced to leave, but many other innocent ethnic-Nepali citizens were coerced to leave by the angry ethnic-Nepali dissidents.
The
Kyodo News Agency reported the ‘massacre’ of the demonstrators at the hands of the Bhutanese army. This report was reportedly submitted by a Nepali reporter based in Siliguri and passed on to the headquarters in Kathmandu. The report was later dismissed as inaccurate but damaged Bhutan’s international image.The census exercise thus came to an end and the southern border of Bhutan became a hotbed of militancy for several years.
The refugee leaders believed that for them to receive UN assistance and recognition of their sought-after ‘refugee’ status, their numbers should not be less than 100,000. To achieve this end, the insurgents primarily targeted the homes of Nepalese in southern Bhutan. Through persuasion as well as through coercion, more of them were persuaded to leave Bhutan and join the others at the camps that had slowly been established in eastern Nepal.
Thus a group of several thousand left and settled in refugee camps set up by
UNHCR . TheBhutanese refugee issue was thus born and remains unresolved.Refugee point of view
Cultural and ethnic differences
Drukpas are of mongoloid origin while Nepalese are of Indo-Argyan origin.
Lhotshampa s' refer to 'southern dwellers' and southern Bhutan is mostly populated by Bhutanese of Nepalese origin though many northern Bhutanese also live in the south and qualify to be referred to as Lhotsampas. The Nepalese population of Bhutan speak Nepali and exercise Nepali customs and most have not well assimilated with the local culture. Bhutan is also a magnet for illegal migrants, mostly of Nepalese origin from Nepal and India and it is almost impossible to distinguish the legitimate residents from the illegal migrants due to the lack of assimilation by the former.Notes
References
*
*
*
* cite news | last = | first = | title = 327 Killed in Bhutan Last Week | pages = 12–27
publisher = Japan Times | date =1990-09-28 | url = http://www.japantimes.co.jp | accessdate = 2006-07-03
* cite news | last = | first = | title = Anti-nationals in open revolt | pages = 1
publisher = Kuensel| date =1990-09-29 | url = http://www.kuenselonline.com | accessdate = 2006-07-03
*
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.