- BCPA Flight 304
Infobox Airliner accident|name=BCPA Flight 304
Date=October 29 1953
Type=Controlled flight into terrain
Site=El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space
Fatalities=19
Injuries=0
Aircraft Type=DC-6
Operator=British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines
Tail Number=VH-BPE
Passengers=11
Crew=8
Survivors =0British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines (BCPA) Flight 304 was a DouglasDC-6 , named "Resolution" and registered VH-BPE, on a flight fromSydney toSan Francisco , with scheduled stops atNadi (Fiji ),Canton Island , andHonolulu . It crashed during its initial approach towardsSan Francisco International Airport onOctober 29 ,1953 , killing all 19 people on board, including the American pianistWilliam Kapell .The aircraft was flying the Honolulu - San Francisco leg with a crew of 8 and 11 passengers (10 adults and 1 child). Captain B. N. Dickson (aged 34) and his crew took over the plane in Honolulu as scheduled. The estimated flying time was 9 hours and 25 minutes. Dickson and his First Officer, F. A. Campbell (aged 28) each had several thousand hours of flight time in a DC-6. Both pilots had made more than 100 approaches into San Francisco Airport, many of which were actual instrument approaches. The weather in the San Francisco area presented no adverse flight conditions; however, visual reference with the ground was precluded by the overcast foggy conditions and an instrument approach was required.cite web | url = http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/BCPA_Flight_304_accident_investigation_report | title = BCPA Flight 304 accident investigation report | publisher =
Civil Aeronautics Board | year = 1954 ]Events leading up to crash
As the flight neared the California coast, the flight contacted San Francisco Air Route Traffic Control (ARTC). At 8:07 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, it was cleared to descend in accordance with
Visual Flight Rules and to maintain at least convert|500|ft|m on top of clouds, which the flight acknowledged. At 8:15 a.m., the flight reported that it was starting descent and at that time was given the San Francisco weather report. Just after 8:21 a.m. ARTC cleared the flight to the San Francisco ILS Outer Marker via the Half Moon Bay Fan Marker direct to the San Francisco Outer Marker, with instructions to maintain at least convert|500|ft|m above all clouds and to contact San Francisco Approach Control after passing the Half Moon Bay Fan Marker. At 8:39 a.m., the flight called San Francisco Approach Control and advised that it was over Half Moon Bay, convert|500|ft|m on top of clouds. Approximately three minutes later, the flight reported “Southeast, turning inbound”. At 8:45 a.m., a call to the flight was unanswered as were all subsequent calls. cite web | url = http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/BCPA_Flight_304_accident_investigation_report | title = BCPA Flight 304 accident investigation report | publisher =Civil Aeronautics Board | year = 1954 ]Investigation and probable cause of crash
The
Civil Aeronautics Board investigated the accident. The investigation began immediately after locating the wreckage in the mountainous area southwest of San Francisco, about seven and a half miles southeast of the town of Half Moon Bay. The aircraft was almost entirely destroyed by impact and ensuing fire. It had initially topped several large redwood trees, continued across a narrow ravine and crashed against the side of a steeply rising slope approximately half a mile beyond the first tree strike. The main wreckage area was at about convert|1950|ft|m above Mean Sea Level.The landing gear was down and locked at impact. There was no evidence of mechanical or structural failure prior to the impact. The accident site was between the Half Moon Bay Fan Marker and the ILS Outer Marker and it appears that the flight did not maintain at least convert|500|ft|m on top of clouds between these points but had descended in weather conditions which precluded reference to the ground. In addition, the flight had reported being over the Half Moon Bay Fan Marker at 8:39 a.m. and then “Southeast, turning inbound” at about 8:42 a.m.: in this time interval it would not have been possible for the flight at normal speed to have flown from the Half Moon Bay Outer Marker to the ILS Outer Marker, made the required turn and returned to the site of the crash in accordance with CAA approved instrument approach procedure. Thus it was likely that when the pilot reported he was “Southeast, turning inbound”, he was in fact southwest of the airport. The investigation then stated that it was probable that the captain, after reporting over Half Moon Bay, either saw the terrain momentarily through an unreported break in the overcast foggy conditions or because of a radio navigational error became convinced that his position was farther northeast and started to descend over what he believed was the proper area.
It was therefore concluded that the probable cause of the crash was the failure of the crew to follow prescribed procedures for an instrument approach. cite web | url = http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/BCPA_Flight_304_accident_investigation_report | title = BCPA Flight 304 accident investigation report | publisher =
Civil Aeronautics Board | year = 1954 ]Resolution Trail
Today, the crash site is part of the "El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve", which includes the "Resolution Trail", named for the plane. Park rules restrict visitors to the trail and all pieces of wreckage are to remain on-site being looked upon as historical artefacts.
References
External links
* [http://www.openspace.org/preserves/pr_madera.asp El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.