- Strawbridge v. Curtiss
SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Strawbridge v. Curtiss
ArgueDate=February 12
ArgueYear=1806
DecideDate=February 13
DecideYear=1806
FullName=Strawbridge, et al. v. Curtiss, et al.
USVol=7
USPage=267
Citation=3 Cranch 267; 1806 WL 1213 (U.S.Mass.); 2 L.Ed. 435
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=A controversy is not "between citizens of different states," so as to give jurisdiction to the federal courts, unless all the persons on one side of it are citizens of different states from all the persons on the other side.
SCOTUS=1804-1806
Majority=Marshall
JoinMajority="unanimous"
LawsApplied=Judiciary Act of 1789 "Strawbridge v. Curtiss", 7 U.S. 267 (
1806 ) [ [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=7&page=267 7 U.S. 267] Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.] , was a case in which theSupreme Court of the United States first addressed the question of complete diversity. In a 158 word opinion the court held that for federaldiversity jurisdiction under section 11 of theJudiciary Act of 1789 , every party on one side must be citizens of a different state. Therefore, when there are jointplaintiff s ordefendant s, jurisdiction must be established as to each party. This requirement remains in law as a matter ofstatutory interpretation , not constitutional law.ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 7 References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.