Union of Banana Exporting Countries

The Union of Banana Exporting Countries ( _es. Unión de Países Exportadores de Banano or UPEB) was a Central/South American cartel inspired by OPEC. In 1974 Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama joined together in an attempt to form a banana growers' cartel in respect of exports to the North American market. cite book | last =Lafeber | first =Walter | year =1993 | title =Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America | publisher =W. W. Norton & Company | id =ISBN 0-393-30964-9 p. 207-208.] The Philippines was the only major exporter of bananas to the United States which did not join. cite book
last =James K.
first =Boyce
authorlink =
coauthors =
year =1993
title =The Philippines: The Political Economy of Growth and Impoverishment in the Marcos Era
publisher =University of Hawaii Press
location =
id =ISBN 0-8248-1522-X p. 181 ] It should be noted that market for banana exports to Europe at this time was quite separate, with European countries being supplied largely by former European (mainly French and British) colonies in the Caribbean, which had privileged access to the European market.

Banana prices had gone up little in 20 years. A UN study had recently concluded that no more than seventeen cents of each dollar spent by North Americans on bananas went to producing countries. At the time bananas were monopolized by three US companies: United Brands Company (formerly United Fruit), Standard Fruit, and the Del Monte Corporation.

UPEB proposed an export tax of one dollar for every forty-pound box of bananas exported. The monopolies protested and threatened to withdraw their operations. There was also a glut on the world banana market and Ecuador, the leading producer, refused to enact the tax. Former Costa Rican president José Figueres stated that Standard Fruit's property should be nationalized if the monopolies refused to pay the tax. Standard Fruit threatened the new Costa Rican president, Daniel Oduber that if there were any more threats, the company would pull out of Costa Rica. Costa Rica dropped its demand to 25¢ a crate. cite book
last =Fox
first =Dennis N.
authorlink =
coauthors =
year =2002
title =Totally Bananas: The Funny Fruit in American History and Culture
publisher =Xlibris Corporation
location =
id =ISBN 1-4010-7134-1 p. 126] cite journal
first =David
last =Pauly
authorlink =
coauthors =Rich Thomas
year =1975
month =April 21
title =The Great Banana Bribe
journal =Newsweek
volume =
issue =
pages =76
id =
url =http://www.igottheconch.com/index.php?title=Bananagate#Newsweek:The_Great_Banana_Bribe ]

Bananagate

In 1974 Honduras passed a law to raise the tax on banana exports from 25¢ to 50¢ per 40-pound box. Honduras had supplied more than 22% of United Brands Company exports in 1974. cite journal
first =
last =
authorlink =
coauthors =
year =1975
month =May 3 cock
title =Banana tax raised
journal =Facts on File World News Digest
volume =
issue =
pages =
id =
url =http://www.igottheconch.com/index.php?title=Bananagate#Facts_on_File_World_News_Digest:Banana_tax_raised ]

The next year, Eli M. Black, the chairman and president of United Brands Company jumped to his death from the forty fourth floor of the Pan Am Building in Manhattan. When the Securities and Exchange Commission invesigated Black's suicide, it uncovered a scandal called "Bananagate". The United Brands Company had paid a $1.25 million bribe to Honduran President Oswaldo López Arellano, followed by another $1.25 million dollars the next year. The money was to be put in a Swiss bank account. The operation was managed via then secretary of finance, Abram Bennaton Ramos. After the bribe the Honduran tax was reduced from fifty cents to twenty-five cents per box. This caused the UPEB cartel to collapse. This reduction saved United Brands Company about $7.5 million in tax payments. In addition it was discovered that United Brands Company had paid another $750,000 in bribes to an Italian official to prevent restrictions on United's banana exports to Italy, beginning in 1970. The SEC determined that none of the bribes could have been paid without the knowledge and approval of Black. While it was not illegal at the time for US companies to bribe officials, it was illegal for companies to hide such bribes from their stockholders. cite book
last =Marshall
first =Clinard
authorlink =
coauthors =Peter Yeager
year =2005
title =Corporate Crime
publisher =Transaction Publishers
location =
id =ISBN 1-4128-0493-0 p. 179-180]

United Brands Company also admitted that it had tried to convince the SEC that the bribes should be kept secret, on the ground that disclosure would hurt the company and its stockholders. The company's Washington law firm, Covington & Burling, asked the U.S. State Department to intervene, arguing that news of the Honduran bribe could harm U.S. relations with that country. The State Department declined.

When the bribe was revealed, it provoked the overthrow of the military government in Honduras and this in turn led to the nationalisation of United's railroads along with a major divestiture of land by the companies. cite journal
first =Robert
last =Graham
authorlink =
coauthors =
year =1990
month =February 17
title =A modern banana republic
journal =Financial Times
volume =
issue =
pages =XV
id =
url = ]

Later history

On May 1, 1975, Costa Rica passed a law to raise the tax on banana exports from 25¢ to $1 per 40-pound box. The decree stated that 45¢ of each tax dollar would go to the government and the other 55¢ to subsidize independent banana growers. United Brands' local subsidiary, the Costa Rican Banana Co., then filed a $3 million suit against the government in April 1975, stating that the export levy violated a government guarantee not to tax the company until its contract with the government expired in 1988.

Since its formation, the Union of Banana Exporting Countries has been largely limited to charging a modest tax on corporate banana exports. cite book
last =Steve
first =Striffler
authorlink =
coauthors =Mark Moberg
year =2003
title =Banana Wars
publisher =Duke University Press
location =
id =ISBN 0-8223-3196-9 ]

Notes