- Spirit Cave, Thailand
The Spirit Cave ( _th. ถ้ำผีแมน, "tham phi maen") is an archaeologic site in Pang Mapha district,
Mae Hong Son Province , NorthwesternThailand . It was occupied from about 9000 until 5500 BC byHoabinhian hunters and gatherers.Location
The site is located at an elevation of 650 m. above sea level on a hillside overlooking the
Salween River . It was excavated in the mid1960 s byChester Gorman . Two other significant sites nearby are theBanyan Valley Cave and theSteep Cliff Cave .New Stone Age
The site is dated in the
Neolithic orNew Stone Age , a period in the development of human technology that is traditionally the last part of theStone Age . Beginning with the rise of farming, which produced the "Neolithic Revolution " and ending when metal tools became widespread in theCopper Age (chalcolithic ) orBronze Age The plant domestication
Gorman [Gorman C. (1971) The
Hoabinhian and After: Subsistence Patterns in Southeast Asia during the LatePleistocene and Early Recent Periods. World Archaeology 2: 300-20] claimed that Spirit Cave included remains of Prunus (almond), Terminalia, Areca (betel), Vicia (broadbean) or Phaseolus, Pisum (pea) or Raphia Lagenaria (bottle gourd), Trapa (Chinese water chestnut), Piper (pepper), Madhuca (butternut), Canarium, Aleurites (candle nut), and Cucumis (a cucumber type) in layers dating to c. 9800-8500 BP. None of the recovered specimens differed from their wildphenotypes . He suggested that these may have been used as foods,condiments ,stimulants , for lighting and that theleguminous plants in particular 'point to a very early use ofdomesticated plants' [Gorman C. (1969) Hoabinhian: A pebble tool complex with early plant associations in Southeast Asia. Science 163: 671-3 ] . He later wrote [Gorman C. (1971) The Hoabinhian and After: Subsistence Patterns in Southeast Asia during the Late Pleistocene and Early Recent Periods. World Archaeology 2: 311] that 'Whether they are definitely early cultigens remains to be established... What is important, and what we can say definitely, is that the remains indicate the early, quite sophisticated use of particular species which are still culturally important in Southeast Asia.'In 1972 W.G. Solheim, as the director of the project of which Spirit Cave was part, published an article in Scientific American discussing the finds from Spirit Cave. While Solheim noted that the specimens may 'merely be wild species gathered from the surrounding countryside', he claimed that the inhabitants at Spirit Cave had 'an advanced knowledge of
horticulture '. Solheim'schronological chart suggests that 'incipientagriculture ' began at about 20,000 B.C. in southeast Asia. He also suggests that ceramic technology was invented at 13,000 B.C. although Spirit Cave does not have ceramics until after 6800 B.C. [Solheim, W.G. (1972) An earlier agricultural revolution. Scientific American 226: 34-41 ]Although Solheim concludes that his reconstruction is 'largely hypothetical', his
overstatement of the results of Gorman's excavation has led to inflated claims of Hoabinhian agriculture. These claims have detracted from the significance of Spirit Cave as a site with well-preserved evidence of humansubsistence and palaeoenvironmental conditions during the Hoabinhian.References
ources
*cite book|title=Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia|author=Charles Higham|pages=46-49|publisher=River Books|year=2002
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.