- Thomas Erastus
Thomas Erastus (
September 7 ,1524 –December 31 ,1583 ) was aSwiss theologian best known for a posthumously published work in which he argued that the sins of Christians should be punished by the state, and not by the church withholding the sacraments. A generalization of this idea, that the state is supreme in church matters, is known somewhat misleadingly as Erastianism.Life
Erastus, whose surname was Liber, Lieber, or Liebler, was born of poor parents, probably at Baden,
Canton of Aargau , Switzerland.In 1540 he was studying theology at Basel. The plague of 1544 drove him to
Bologna and thence toPadua as student ofphilosophy and medicine. In 1553 he becamephysician to the count of Henneberg,Saxe-Meiningen , and in 1558 held the same post with the elector-palatine,Otto Heinrich , being at the same time professor of medicine atHeidelberg . His patron's successor, Frederick III, made him (1559) aprivy councillor and member of the churchconsistory .In theology he followed Zwingli, and at the
sacramentarian conferences of Heidelberg (1560) andMaulbronn (1564) he advocated by voice and pen theZwinglian doctrine of theLord's Supper , replying (1565) to the counter arguments of theLutheran Johann Marbach , ofStrasbourg . He ineffectually resisted the efforts of theCalvinists , led byCaspar Olevianus , to introduce thePresbyterian polity and discipline, which were established at Heidelberg in 1570, on the Genevan model.One of the first acts of the new church system was to excommunicate Erastus on a charge of
Socinianism , founded on his correspondence withTransylvania . The ban was not removed till 1575, Erastus declaring his firm adhesion to the doctrine of theTrinity . His position, however, was uncomfortable, and in 1580 he returned toBasel , where in 1583 he was made professor of ethics.Works
He published several pieces bearing on medicine,
astrology andalchemy , and attacking the system ofParacelsus . His name is permanently associated with a posthumous publication, written in 1568. Its immediate occasion was the disputation at Heidelberg (1568) for the doctorate of theology byGeorge Wither , an EnglishPuritan (subsequently Archdeacon ofColchester ), silenced (1565) atBury St Edmunds by Archbishop Parker.Withers had proposed a disputation against vestments, which the university would not allow; his thesis affirming the
excommunicating power of the presbytery was sustained. Hence theTreatise of Erastus . It was published (1589) byGiacomo Castelvetro , who had married his widow, with the title "Explicatio gravissimae quaestionis utrum excommunicatio, quatenus religionem intelligentes et amplexantes, a sacramentorum usu, pro pier admissum facinus arcet, mandato natur divino, an excogitala sit ab hominibus". The work bears the imprint Pesclavii (i.e. Poschiavo in theGrisons ) but was printed by John Wolfe in London, where Castelvetri was staying; the name of the alleged printer is an anagram of "Jacobum Castelvetrum." In the "Stationers' Register" (June 20 ,1589 ) the printing is said to have been allowed by Archbishop Whitgift.It consists of seventy-five "Theses", followed by a "Confirmatio" in six books, and an appendix of letters to Erastus by
Heinrich Bullinger andRudolph Gualther , showing that his "Theses", written in 1568, had been circulated in manuscript. An English translation of the "Theses", with brief life of Erastus (based onMelchior Adam 's account), was issued in 1659, entitled "The Nullity of Church Censures"; it was reprinted as "A Treatise of Excommunication" (1682), and, as revised by Robert Lee, D.D., in 1844.The aim of the work is to show, on Scriptural grounds, that sins of professing Christians are to be punished by civil authority, and not by withholding of sacraments on the part of the clergy. In the
Westminster Assembly a party holding this view includedJohn Selden ,John Lightfoot , Coleman andBulstrode Whitelocke , whose speech (1645) is appended to Lee's version of the "Theses"; but the opposite view, after much controversy, was carried, Lightfoot alone dissenting. The consequent chapter of the "Westminster Confession of Faith " ("Of Church Censures") was, however, not ratified by the English parliament. Erastianism, as a by-word, is used to denote the doctrine of the supremacy of the state in ecclesiastical causes; but the problem of the relations between church and state is one on which Erastus nowhere enters.What is known as Erastianism would be better connected with the name of
Hugo Grotius . The only direct reply made to the "Explicatio" was the "Tractatus de vera excommunicatione" (1590) byTheodore Beza , who found himself rather savagely attacked in the "Confirmatio thesium"; e.g. "Apostolum et Mosen adeoque Deum ipsum audes corrigere."References
*
Auguste Bonnard , "Thomas Éraste et la discipline ecclésiastique" (1894)
*Wilhelm Gass , in "Allgemeine deutsche Biog." (1877)
*G. V. Lechler andR. Sthelin , in A. Hauck's "Realencyklop. für prot. Theol. u. Kirche" (1898)
*1911
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.