- Pauxi
Taxobox
name = "Pauxi"
image_width = 225px
image_caption = (Northern) Helmeted Curassow, "Pauxi pauxi"
regnum =Animal ia
phylum =Chordata
classis =Aves
ordo =Galliformes
familia =Cracidae
genus = "Pauxi"
genus_authority = Temminck,1813
subdivision_ranks = Species
subdivision =2, see text.The
genus "Pauxi" consist of the two species of helmetedcurassow s, terrestrial blackfowl with ornamental casque on their heads. Both are found inSouth America .This genus contains only 2 species, namely
*Northern Helmeted Curassow or simply Helmeted Curassow, "Pauxi pauxi"
*Southern Helmeted Curassow or Horned Curassow, "Pauxi unicornis"The latter was formerly united with in "P. pauxi" under the name "Helmeted Curassow". It is preferable to use the "Northern" and "Southern" names, because each species contains 2subspecies , of which one has a round, "helmet-like", and the other an elongated "horn-like" bill knob.As indicated by analysis of mt and
nDNA sequences and calibrated withgeological data, this genus' ancestors probably diverged from those of "Mitu", their closest living relatives, in theTortonian (earlyLate Miocene ), some 8-7.4 mya. How the present distribution in 4 small areas quite distant from each other came to be is not known. Given that helmeted curassows are birds of the foothills and uplands, it might be that the ancestral "Pauxi" population became fragmented by the uplift of theAndes , which in their area of distribution took place during the Late Miocene, around the "Pauxi"-"Mitu" divergence and some time after.(Pereira & Baker 2002, Pereira "et al." 2002).Pereira & Baker (2002) reported an interesting find: in the mtDNA phylogeny, "Pauxi" was
paraphyletic , with "P. unicornis" being resolved as thesister species of "Mitu tuberosa ". This, of course, does not automatically imply that they are closely related or that the genera are invalid. Rather, the authors point out, given the distinct and peculiar morphology of the two genera, incompletelineage sorting or hybridization between ancestral individuals of the two species is a more likely explanation. According to their data, there must have been some extent ofgene flow between "Mitu tuberosa" and "P. unicornis" around 2 mya. Unfortunately, the authors do not provide subspecific identification of their single "P. unicornis" specimen. In any case, they took care to exclude captive hybridization in their choice of samples, as it is frequently known to occur in curassows and would have confounded the analysis. Altogether, what can be said with certainty is that there seems to have been some extent of hybridization between at least one population of the Southern Helmeted Curassow and femaleRazor-billed Curassow s at the end of thePliocene .References
* Pereira, Sérgio Luiz & Baker, Allan J. (2004): Vicariant speciation of curassows (Aves, Cracidae): a hypothesis based on mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. "Auk" 121(3): 682-694. [English with Spanish abstract] DOI:10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121 [0682:VSOCAC] 2.0.CO;2 [http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1642%2F0004-8038%282004%29121%5B0682%3AVSOCAC%5D2.0.CO%3B2 HTML abstract] [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3793/is_200407/ai_n9456682 HTML fulltext without images]
* Pereira, Sérgio Luiz; Baker, Allan J.& Wajntal, Anita (2002): Combined nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences resolve generic relationships within the Cracidae (Galliformes, Aves). "Systematic Biology" 51(6): 946-958. DOI|10.1080/10635150290102519 [http://individual.utoronto.ca/sergiolp/pdf/SB2002.pdf PDF fulltext]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.