- Hung parliament
In
Parliamentary systems, a hung parliament is one in which no onepolitical party has an outright majority, and means it is most commonly equally balanced. This situation is normal in many legislatures withproportional representation such asGermany orItaly , or in legislatures with strong regional parties. Inmajoritarian chambers with weak regional parties, it is a rarity, as in these circumstances one party will usually hold enough seats to form a majority.A hung parliament will force either a
coalition government , aminority government or adissolution of parliament . Frequent hung parliaments can result in smaller parties staying in power for decades as they switch support between the two or three major parties (this is what happened with theFree Democratic Party inWest Germany prior to reunification).The most recent hung parliament after a general election in the
United Kingdom was the February 1974 general election, which lasted until the October election that year. Prior to that the last had been the elections of 1951 and 1929. Hung parliaments can also arise when slim government majorities are eroded byby-election defeats anddefection of Members of Parliament to opposition parties. This happened in 1996 to the Conservative government of SirJohn Major (1990-97) and in 1978 to the Labour government ofJames Callaghan (1976-79).An alternative term for a hung parliament, preferred by the Liberal Democrats in the UK, is a balanced parliament.
The current
Parliament of Canada is a hung parliament; however, the term is not used in Canada. Instead, the term minority government or minority parliament is used.Negotiation
A hung Parliament inevitably leads to a period of uncertainty after an election, especially in countries that are not used to it. In the 1974 UK General Election, sitting
Prime Minister Edward Heath refused at first to resign, attempting to build a coalition government despite winning fewer seats (though gaining more votes) than the then opposition Labour Party.Much speculation has gone into whether the
Liberal Democrats in the UK would support a Labour government if no party won a majority in the General Election. In such a situation, they could be "kingmakers", in that, as the centre party, they could choose to ally with either Labour or the Conservatives to form the next government, or decide to support specific measures of a minority government without entering a formal coalition. This issue has particular relevance in the current political climate of Britain. Fact|date=October 2008Working majority
Sometimes although a parliament or assembly may be technically hung, the party in power can have a working majority. Such was the case in the
National Assembly for Wales , where Labour lost their majority whenPeter Law was expelled for standing against the official candidate in the 2005 Westminster election in the Blaenau Gwent constituency. When the Assembly was first elected onMay 1 ,2003 , Labour won 30 seats.Plaid Cymru won 12, the Conservatives won 11, and the Lib Dems won 6 (an Independent candidate won a seat as well). WhenDafydd Elis-Thomas (Plaid) was reelected as the presiding officer, this reduced the number of opposition AMs who could vote to 29, as the presiding officer only votes in the event of a tie, and even then not on party political lines. Thus Labour had a "working" majority of one seat. This was lost when Law ran in Blaenau Gwent [ [http://www.epolitix.com/EN/News/200504/1c6a58e1-0c76-46b6-8b0d-f3fd085839fc.htm Labour lose assembly majority as Law quits] , ePolitix.com.April 17 ,2005 .] .ee also
*
Minority government Notes
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.