Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz

Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz
ArgueDate=April 19
ArgueYear=2004
DecideDate=June 7
DecideYear=2004
FullName=Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Petitioner v. Thomas E. Heinz, et al.
USVol=541
USPage=739
Citation=
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=ERISA §204(g) prohibits a plan amendment expanding the categories of postretirement employment that triggers suspension of the payment of early retirement benefits already accrued.
SCOTUS=1994-2005
Majority=Souter
JoinMajority="unanimous court"
Concurrence=Breyer
JoinConcurrence=Rehnquist, O'Connor, Ginsburg
LawsApplied=

"Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz", 541 U.S. 739 (2004), is a case that was argued in the Supreme Court of the United States on 19 April 2004. The question it presented was whether Section 204(g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act contradicts Section 203(a)(3)(B).

ee also

*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 541

Further reading

*cite journal |last=Clarkson |first=Michael |authorlink= |coauthors=Thomas, Ann |year=2004 |month= |title=Recent Developments in Employer-Employee Relations |journal=Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal |volume=40 |issue= |pages=369 |issn=15433234 |url= |accessdate= |quote=
*cite journal |last=Ryan |first=Priscilla E. |authorlink= |coauthors=Sharara, Norma M. |year=2004 |month= |title=Employee Benefits |journal=Tax Lawyer |volume=58 |issue= |pages=1055 |issn=0040005X |url= |accessdate= |quote=

External links

* [http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/02-891.html Full text of the case courtesy Findlaw.com]