 Merton's portfolio problem

Merton's Portfolio Problem is a well known problem in continuoustime finance. An investor with a finite lifetime must choose how much to consume and must allocate his wealth between stocks and a riskfree asset so as to maximize expected lifetime utility. The problem was formulated and solved by Robert C. Merton in 1969; research has continued to extend and generalize the model.
Contents
Problem statement
The investor lives from time 0 to time T; his wealth at time t is denoted W_{t}. He starts with a known initial wealth W_{0} (which may include the present value of wage income). At time t he must choose what amount of his wealth to consume: c_{t} and what fraction of wealth to invest in a stock portfolio: π_{t} (the remaining fraction 1 − π_{t} being invested in the riskfree asset).
The objective is
where E is the expectation operator, u is a known utility function (which applies both to consumption and to the terminal wealth, or bequest, W_{T}) and δ is the subjective discount rate.
The wealth evolves according to the stochastic differential equation
where r is the riskfree rate, (μ, σ) are the expected return and volatility of the stock market and dB_{t} is the increment of the Wiener process, i.e. the stochastic term of the SDE.
Additional assumptions. The utility function is of the constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) form:
Consumption cannot be negative: c_{t} ≥ 0, while π_{t} is unrestricted (that is borrowing or shorting stocks is allowed).
Investment opportunities are assumed constant, that is r, μ, σ are known and constant, in this (1969) version of the model, although Merton later allowed them to change.
Solution
Somewhat surprisingly for an optimal control problem, a closedform solution exists. The optimal consumption and stock allocation depend on wealth and time as follows:
(Note that W and t do not appear on the righhand side, this implies that a constant fraction of wealth is invested in stocks, no matter what the age or prosperity of the investor)
where A is a constant.
Extensions
Many variations of the problem have been explored, but most do not lead to a simple closedform solution.
 A utility function other than CRRA can be used.
 Transaction costs can be introduced. For proportional transaction costs the problem was solved by Davis and Norman in 1990. It is one of the few cases of stochastic singular control where the solution is known. For a graphical representation, the amount invested in each of the two assets can be plotted on the x and yaxes; three diagonal lines through the origin can be drawn: the upper boundary, the Merton line and the lower boundary. The Merton line represents portfolios having the stock/bond proportion derived by Merton in the absence of transaction costs. As long as the point which represents the current portfolio is near the Merton line, i.e. between the upper and the lower boundary, no action needs to be taken. When the portfolio crosses above the upper or below the lower boundary, one should rebalance the portfolio to bring it back to the boundary. In 1994 Shreve and Soner provided an analysis of the problem via the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation and its viscosity solutions.
 When there are fixed transaction costs the problem was addressed by Eastman and Hastings in 1988. A numerical solution method was provided by Schroder in 1995.
 Finally Morton and Pliska (1995) considered trading costs that are proportional to the wealth of the investor, as a kind of penalty to discourage frequent trading, although this cost structure seems unrepresentative of real life transaction costs.
 The assumption of constant investment opportunities can be relaxed. This requires a model for how r,μ,σ change over time. An interest rate model could be added and would lead to a portfolio containing bonds of different maturities. Some authors have added a stochastic volatility model of stock market returns.
 Additional assets can be added, for example individual stocks. However, the problem becomes difficult or intractable.
 Bankruptcy can be incorporated. This problem was solved by Karatzas, Lehoczky, Sethi and Shreve in 1986. Many models incorporating bankruptcy are collected in Sethi (1997).
References
 Davis M.H.A, A. R. Norman: Portfolio selection with transaction costs, Mathematics of Operations Research, 15(4), 1990, pp.676–713.
 Karatzas I., Shreve S.: Methods of Mathematical Finance, Springer (1998).
 Merton R.C.: Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous time case, Rev. Econ. Stat. 51, 1969, pp.247–257.
 Merton R.C.: Continuous Time Finance, Blackwell (1990).
 Eastham J.E., K.J. Hastings: Optimal impulse control of portfolios, Mathematics of Operations Research, 13(4), 1988, pp.588–605.
 Morton A.J., S.R. Pliska : Optimal portfolio management with fixed transaction costs, Mathematical Finance 5(4), 1995, pp.337–356.
 Schroder, M.: Optimal Portfolio Selection with Fixed Transaction Costs: Numerical Solutions, Working Paper, Michigan State University (1995).
 Shreve, S. and H. M. Soner: Optimal Investment and Consumption with Transaction Costs, The Annals of Applied Probability, 4, 1994, pp.609–692.
 Sethi, S.: Optimal Consumption and Investment with Bankruptcy, Kluwer (1997). Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1118029
 Karatzas, I., J. P. Lehoczky, S. P. Sethi, S.E. Shreve: "Explicit Solution of a General Consumption/Investment Problem", Mathematics of Operations Research, 11, 1986, pp.261294.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.