- South West Africa
Infobox Former Country
native_name = "Suidwes-Afrika"
"Südwestafrika"
conventional_long_name = South-West Africa
common_name = South-West Africa|
continent = Africa
country = Namibia
status = League of Nations Mandate
empire = South Africa|
year_start = 1915
year_end = 1990|
event_end = Independence
date_end =21 March 1990
event1 =Treaty of Versailles
date_event1 = 1919|
p1 = German South-West Africa
flag_p1 = Flag of the German Empire.svg
s1 = Namibia
flag_s1 = Flag of Namibia.svg|
flag_type = Flag (from 1928)
symbol_type = Coat of arms
symbol = Coat of arms of Namibia
symbol_type = Coat of arms
symbol = Coat of arms of Namibia
image_map_caption = Location of South-West Africa|
capital =Windhoek
currency = South West African Pound
South African Rand
common_languages = English,Afrikaans , German (1984-1990) [http://www.az.com.na/fileadmin/pdf/2007/deutsch_in_namibia_2007_07_18.pdf] |
representative1 =Gerrit Viljoen
representative2 =Danie Hough
representative3 =Willie van Niekerk
representative4 =Louis Pienaar
year_representative1 = 1977-1980
year_representative2 = 1980-1983
year_representative3 = 1983-1985
year_representative4 = 1985-1990
title_representative = Administrator-generalSouth-West Africa (Afrikaans: "Suidwes-Afrika"; German: "Südwestafrika") was the name of what is today the
Republic of Namibia .As a
German colony from 1884 it was known asGerman South-West Africa ("Deutsch-Südwestafrika"). Germany had a difficult time administering the territory, which, owing to the Germans' brutal native policy, experienced many insurrections, especially those led by guerilla leaderJakobus Morenga .During
World War I , in 1915, the region was taken from German control. After the war it was declared aLeague of Nations Mandate territory under theTreaty of Versailles , withSouth Africa responsible for its administration.The Mandate was supposed to become a
United Nations Trust Territory when League of Nations Mandates were transferred to theUnited Nations followingWorld War II , but theUnion of South Africa refused to agree to allow the territory to begin the transition to independence as it was essentially considered to be a "de facto" fifth province of South Africa, even though it was never actually incorporated into the country. South Africa's stance on its ownership to South-West Africa was due to the fact that she governed the territory for decades and had invested money on its infrastructure and modernization.Walvis Bay and thePenguin Islands had been annexed by Britain as part of theCape Colony in 1878, and thus became part of the Union of South Africa in 1910. Administration of Walvis Bay was later transferred by South Africa to SWA in 1922 and then again returned back to theCape Province in 1977.These South African actions gave rise to several rulings at the
International Court of Justice . In 1950, it ruled that South Africa did not have any obligation to convert South-West Africa to a United Nations Trust Territory, but was still bound by the League of Nations Mandate with theUnited Nations General Assembly assuming the supervisory role. It also clarified that the General Assembly was empowered to receive petitions from the inhabitants of South-West Africa and to call for reports from the mandatory nation, South Africa. [ [http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/isswasummary500711.htm International Status of South-West Africa - Advisory Opinion] ] The General Assembly constituted the Committee on South-West Africa to perform the supervisory functions. [ [http://www.klausdierks.com/Chronology/index_united_nations.htm List of United Nations Organisations and Resolutions concerning Namibia] ] In another advisory opinion issued in 1955, the Court further ruled that the General Assembly was not required to follow League of Nations voting procedures in determining questions concerning South-West Africa. [ [http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/itswasummary550607.htm Voting Procedure on Questions Relating to Reports and Petitions Concerning the Territory of South-West Africa - Advisory Opinion] ] In 1956, the Court further ruled that the Committee had the power to grant hearings to petitioners from the mandated territory. [ [http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/icswasummary560601.htm Admissibility of Hearings of Petitioners by the Committee on South-West Africa - Advisory Opinion] ] In 1960,Ethiopia andLiberia filed a case in theInternational Court of Justice against South Africa alleging that South Africa had not fulfilled its mandatory duties. This case did not succeed, with the Court ruling in 1966 that they were not the proper parties to bring the case. [ [http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/ilsaesasummary621221.htm South-West Africa Cases (Preliminary Objections) Ethiopia v. South Africa and Liberia v. South Africa] ] [ [http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/ilsaesasummary660718.htm South-West Africa Cases (Second Phase) Ethiopia v. South Africa and Liberia v. South Africa] ] In 1966, the General Assembly passed resolution 2145 (XXI) which declared the Mandate terminated and that South Africa had no further right to administer South-West Africa. In 1971, acting on a request for advisory opinion from the United Nations Security Council, the International Court of Justice ruled that the continued presence of South Africa in Namibia was illegal and that South Africa was under an obligation to withdraw from Namibia immediately. It also ruled that all member states of the United Nations were under an obligation to recognize the invalidity of any act performed by South Africa on behalf of Namibia. [ [http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/inamsummary710621.htm Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South-West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276(1970) - Advisory Opinion] ]South-West Africa had been known internationally as Namibia since 1968, when the United Nations General Assembly changed the territory's name. Fact|date=April 2008 This resulted in a protracted struggle between South Africa and forces fighting for independence, particularly after the formation of the
South-West Africa People's Organisation in 1960.The territory became the independent
Republic of Namibia in 1990, withWalvis Bay only becoming part of Namibia in 1994.Bantustans
The South African authorities established 10
bantustan s in Namibia in the late 1960s and early 70s three of which were granted self-rule [ [http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Namibia_homelands.html World Statesman] ] . These bantustans were replaced with separate ethnicity based governments in 1980.
[Namibia as of 1978]The bantustans were:
*
Basterland
*Bushmanland
*Damaraland
*East Caprivi (self rule 1976)
*Hereroland (self-rule 1970)
*Kaokoland
*Kavangoland (self-rule 1973)
*Namaland
*Ovamboland
*Tswanaland References
ee also
*
History of Namibia
*SWATF
*SWAPOL
*Postal Orders of South West Africa
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.