Ehren Watada

Infobox Military Person
name=Ehren Watada
lived=1978-
placeofbirth=Honolulu, Hawaii
placeofdeath=


caption=
nickname=
allegiance=United States of America
serviceyears=2003-
rank=First Lieutenant (1LT)
branch=United States Army
commands=
unit=G-37, HHC, I Corps (Ft. Lewis, WA)
battles=
awards=Army Commendation Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Overseas Service Ribbon, Army Service Ribbon
relations=
laterwork=

Ehren Watada (born 1978) is a First Lieutenant of the United States Army who in June 2006 refused to deploy to Iraq for his unit's assigned rotation to Operation Iraqi Freedom. [http://www.thankyoult.org/mmedia/statement.html Initial video statement of Lt. Ehren Watada] June 6, 2006] [ [http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/military/story/5795894p-5178126c.html Army lieutenant who won’t go to Iraq issues recorded statement] ] Watada said he believed the war to be illegal and that, under the doctrine of command responsibility, it would make him party to war crimes. At the time, he was assigned to duty with the 5th Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, part of the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, as a Fire Support Officer. Watada is the first commissioned officer in the U.S. armed forces to refuse to deploy to Iraq. [http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/274585_watada20.html Soldier's Iraq war stance backed: Watada has right to refuse to go, retired officer says] , "Seattle Post-Intelligencer", June 20 2006.]

Watada's February 2007 court-martial ended in a mistrial when he argued that his orders were unlawful, because Military Judge John Head ruled that question can not be resolved within the military justice system, saying the argument was thus reduced to an admission of guilt. A second court-martial was scheduled but was stayed in October 2007 by U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle, who issued an order stating that Watada's "double jeopardy claim is meritorious" and no evidence that it lacks merit was presented. [http://www.thankyoult.org/images/stories/2007_10_5__fed_ct_-_watadastayorder.pdf Order Granting in Part Petitioner's Motion for a Stay of Court Martial Proceedings] dated 5 October 2007, Tacoma, Washington Federal District case no. C07-5549BHS] The Army is challenging the injunction.

Background

Ehren K. Watada was born in Honolulu, Hawaii to Robert Watada and Carolyn Ho. His father served for 10 years as executive director of Hawaii's Campaign Spending Commission and himself refused to serve in the Vietnam War. [http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0627-06.htm International Day of Action to Support First Lt. Ehren Watada] ] Ehren Watada attended Punahou School, then transferred in his sophomore year to Kalani High School, where he played cornerback on the varsity football team. An Eagle Scout, Watada graduated from Hawaii Pacific University magna cum laude in 2003 with a B.A. in Finance. [ [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003044627_nogo7m.html Officer at Fort Lewis calls Iraq war illegal, refuses order to go] ] [ [http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-officer5feb05,0,1444479.story?coll=la-home-headlines Instead of Iraq, a battle all his own] ]

Watada joined the Army after the war in Iraq had begun, stating that he was motivated "out of a desire to protect our country" after the September 11 attacks. He was commissioned by the Army's Officer Candidate School, on November 20, 2003, at Fort Benning, Georgia as a Second Lieutenant of Field Artillery -- one month after UNSCR 1511 authorized a multinational force in Iraq. [ [http://www.undemocracy.com/S-RES-1511(2003)/page_1 Security Council Resolution 1511] , October 16, 2003.] Watada served one year in South Korea, and was subsequently reassigned to Fort Lewis, Washington. [http://thankyoult.live.radicaldesigns.org/content/view/106/ Officer faces court-martial for refusing to deploy] , "The New York Times", July 23 2006.]

Soon after reporting to Fort Lewis, Watada discovered that his unit would be deploying to Iraq, in support of ongoing operations there. In preparation to deploy, he began conducting research on the country, its culture, and the reasons for the U.S. involvement in Iraq. Watada claims that, after reading several books and articles about the history of Iraq, international law, and the evidence used to justify the war, [http://armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1870677.php Deployment Refuser has no Regrets] , "Army Times", June 14 2006.] and speaking with veterans returning from Iraq, he ceased to believe in its legality and justification.

In January 2006, he attempted to resign his commission. The Army denied his request because he had not fulfilled his eight-year military service obligation for which he had contracted, as required by law. He used as justification for his request that the war violated the Constitution and War Powers Act which "limits the president in his role as Commander in Chief from using the armed forces in any way he sees fit." He also cited the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the Nuremberg Principles, which "bar wars of aggression." He argued the command responsibility would make him personally responsible and liable for legal challenges for violating international law. Further, he asserted that the war was based on misleading or false premises such as the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda, and that the occupation itself did not follow the Army's own legal rules of conduct for occupying a country. [http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/060706A.shtml First Officer Announces Refusal to Deploy to Iraq] , "Truthout.org", June 7 2006.]

Watada has said he is not a conscientious objector because he is not opposed to all wars as a matter of principle, and he claims he has offered to serve in Afghanistan, which he regarded as "an unambiguous war linked to the Sept. 11 attacks." This was also refused. Watada, in turn, refused an offer for a desk job in Iraq without direct combat involvement.

Charges

In response to Watada's refusal to deploy, the Army initially preferred seven specifications of various offenses under the UCMJ. Since the initial preferral, all but three specifications were dropped; the remaining ones sent to the court-martial follow:
*2 specifications Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and a Gentleman (for statements made in speeches and interviews) (Article 133)
*1 specification Missing Movement (for refusing to deploy to Iraq on June 22) (Article 87)When the initial charges were preferred, Watada faced the possibility of a General court-martial and up to seven years in prison, as well as dismissal from the service. ("Dismissal" is the only class of punitive discharge for U.S. commissioned officers; it is the equivalent of a dishonorable discharge, to which enlisted personnel may be sentenced.) Even faced with these consequences, Watada has said that he does not regret his decision, stating that he believes it to have been his moral responsibility:

When you are looking your children in the eye in the future, or when you are at the end of your life, you want to look back on your life and know that at a very important moment, when I had the opportunity to make the right decisions, I did so, even knowing there were negative consequences.

On these charges, Watada's civilian attorney, Eric Seitz, comments:

Well, we expected him to be charged with missing movement or violating an order to get on a bus to accompany his unit to Iraq. We did not really anticipate that they would charge him with additional offenses based upon the comments and the remarks that he's made. And that opens up a whole new chapter in this proceeding, because what the Army has clearly tried to do by the nature of these charges is send out a message to people in the military, that if you criticize the war and if you criticize the decisions that were made to bring the United States into this war, that you, too, could be charged with disloyalty, contemptuous remarks and disrespect for higher officers, and in this case, specifically in this charge, the President. [http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/07/1356221 Army Charges Lieutenant With Contempt and Conduct Unbecoming an Officer for Refusing Iraq Deployment and Criticizing Bush, War] , "Democracy Now", July 7 2006.]

Article 32 hearing

Watada's article 32 hearing to determine whether or not he was deserving a court-martial was held on August 17, 2006. [http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/281518_watada17.html Hearings to open on 'no Iraq' officer: Fort Lewis panel to decide if Watada faces court-martial] , "Seattle Post-Intelligencer", August 17 2006.] The investigating officer Lt. Col. Mark Keith presided. [http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/281742_watada18.html Hearing for soldier who won't serve in Iraq puts war on trial] "Seattle Post Intelligencer", August 18, 2006.]

The Army prosecutor, Capt. Dan Kuecker, described Watada's actions as contemptuous of President George W. Bush, and argued that Watada's public statements hurt morale in his unit. He played video clips from [http://thankyoult.live.radicaldesigns.org/content/view/172/ Lt. Watada's address] to a Veterans for Peace conference. [http://www.theolympian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060817/NEWS01/60817012 Military uses video of Watada speeches as evidence against him] "The Olympian", August 17, 2006.] In that speech, Watada called on his fellow soldiers to stop fighting. [http://thankyoult.live.radicaldesigns.org/content/view/172/ Lt. Watada addresses national veterans convention] "thankyoult.org"]

Eric Seitz, Watada's civilian counsel, and Capt. Mark Kim, Watada's military lawyer, raised the issue of the legality of the war. Over the prosecutor's objections, Seitz and Kim called three witnesses to question the legality of the war. University of Illinois Professor of international law Francis Boyle testified that the war is illegal because it was not authorized by the U.N. Security Council, and claimed that Congress approved the war on the basis of faulty intelligence. Also testifying in Watada's defense were Former United Nations Undersecretary Denis Halliday, and Army Colonel Ann Wright (ret.), who resigned from the army in March 2003 in protest of the coming invasion. Like Boyle, both asserted that the war was illegal and that therefore Watada was within his rights to refuse participation in it. Also, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a friend-of-the-court brief, saying that soldiers should not be court marshalled for explaining their views. [http://www.aclu-wa.org/detail.cfm?id=508 ACLU Defends Free Speech Rights of Lt. Ehren Watada] , "ACLU", August 15 2005.]

Keith recommended Watada for court-martial on all charges, even as he said that he thought that Watada was "sincere in his beliefs." Of the court-martial recommendation, Seitz accused the Army of trying Watada without looking seriously at his arguments and that of the other experts appearing at the trial about the legality of the war. [http://thankyoult.live.radicaldesigns.org/content/view/179/ Investigator recommends court martial on all charges] , "thankyoult.org"]

Post-hearing

On September 15, the Army announced that it had preferred another charge against Watada of "conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman", based on remarks that he made at a Veterans for Peace convention. [ [http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/63/21805 t r u t h o u t | Perspective] "Truthout.org", August 14 2006.] This brought the potential prison term faced by Watada to eight and one-half years in prison if convicted of all charges. Approximately six of these years would have been for statements that he made concerning the war rather than his refusal to deploy to Iraq; "missing movement" is normally punishable by two years. Keith justified the additional charge by asserting that "contempt for the President and suggestion that US soldiers can stop the war simply by refusing to fight borders on mutiny and sedition." [http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091806A.shtml Lieutenant Watada Faces New Charges] , "Truthout.org", September 18 2006.]

On the other hand, Eric Seitz asserts that the Army added the new charge to make a public example of him: "He's not doing anything other than saying things he believes to be true, and that we believe are true. This makes it that much clearer that this is just a political prosecution, and that's really all this case has been about from the beginning." [ [http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/64/22578 "Lieutenant Watada Faces New Charges"] By Sarah Olson, 18 September 2006]

Court-martial

On November 9, 2006, the U.S. Army announced the decision of the Fort Lewis commander, LTG James Dubik, that Watada would face a court martial. The charges of "contempt toward officials" were dismissed without comment. Without the "contempt for officials" charges, Watada could face up to four years confinement, two for missing movement and two for statements that he made, as well as a dismissal, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances, if convicted of the remaining charges. [http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=watada10m&date=20061110&query=ehren+watada Fort Lewis soldier opposed to war faces military trial] , "The Seattle Times," November 10, 2006.]

Watada's defense team had intended to demonstrate that the war was illegal by maintaining that the required congressional approval was granted only on the basis of the existence of WMDs in Iraq and ties between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda. They also intended to subpoena witnesses to testify and to cite the Nuremberg Principles, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/22/wusarmy22.xml It was My Duty to Refuse to go to Iraq] "The Daily Telegraph," November 23, 2006.] which require soldiers to disobey illegal orders. However, on January 16, 2007, Judge John M. Head ruled that Watada would not be allowed to present any defense based on the Nuremberg principles, stating that the legality of a war was a "nonjusticiable political question"cite web|url=http://peacelaw.wikidot.com/local--files/2007-01-30/2007-01-16-rules|title=Ruling of the Court: Defense Request for Hearing on Nuremberg Defense|author=Judge John M. Head|date=January 16, 2007|accessdate=January 30|accessyear=2007] and ruling that the order that Watada had refused was lawful. Watada was also forbidden to present a First Amendment defense.cite web|url=http://peacelaw.wikidot.com/local--files/2007-01-30/2007-01-16-speech|title=Ruling of the Court: Defense Motion to Suppress the Charge and All Specifications Alleging Violations of Article 133|author=Judge John M. Head|date=January 16, 2007|accessdate=January 30|accessyear=2007] Seitz said about the rulings that "they are essentially saying there is no right to criticize, which we all know is not true," and that they intend to appeal any conviction to the federal courts. [http://www.thankyoult.org/content/view/44/23/ Officer facing Court-Martial Denounces War] , "Los Angeles Times," January 17, 2007.]

At a pre-trial press conference Watada remarked that he believed it his duty to refuse to fight in the war, and that he was prepared to face prison time for his beliefs. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/22/wusarmy22.xml It was My Duty to Refuse to go to Iraq] , "Telegraph UK," November 23, 2006.]

On February 5, 2007, Watada's court-martial began with him entering a plea of not guilty to all of the specifications against him. He faced three specifications: one for missing movement, and two for "conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman" related to his public comments criticizing the Bush administration and the war. [ [http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-briefs6.5feb06,1,4078456.story?ctrack=1&cset=true Not-guilty plea in court-martial] "Los Angeles Times," February 6, 2007.] Panel selection was conducted on the first day, narrowing a pool of ten officers down to seven, holding the rank of captain through lieutenant colonel. The court-martial panel is similar to a jury in a civilian trial, but due to special rules provided in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), panels consist of service members equal or superior in rank to the defendant.

On the second day of his court-martial, the prosecution presented opening arguments stating that Watada had "abandoned his soldiers and disgraced himself and the service" [ [http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/02/06/ap3401677.html Army: War Objector Brought Disgrace] "Forbes.com", February 6 2007.] and began calling witnesses. The first witness called was Watada's former Battalion Commander, Lt. Col. Bruce Antonia. He testified that he learned of Watada's feelings about the war soon after Watada concluded, in early January 2006, that the war was illegal. Antonia stated, "I told him I was concerned. I did not want this to turn [this] into a big media event." Furthermore, his chain of command counseled him on the consequences of his actions if he refused to deploy and used his position to make a spectacle of the issue. [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003560267_watada7m0.html Army: Watada betrayed trust] "Seattle Times", February 7 2007.] Lt. Col. William James, another officer who counseled Watada, testified that he found Watada's offer to serve in Afghanistan in "direct conflict" with Watada's written statement or stipulation that he did not want to deploy as a "tool" of the Bush administration. Watada had also stipulated that he had indeed missed his brigade's June deployment to Iraq and that he made a series of public statements against the war. In return for the stipulation, Army prosecutors had dropped several counts that knocked two years off the maximum six-year sentence.

The judge ruled that the court-martial was unable to decide the question of whether the deployment order was unlawful, and decided to strike Watada's stipulation, calling it an admission of guilt. Recognizing that the stipulation was the basis of the prosecution's case, Judge Head granted their request for a mistrial. [http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/302733_courtmartial07ww.html?source=mypi Mistrial ends Watada court-martial: War objector may have to be tried again] , "Seattle Post-Intelligencer", February 7 2007.]

Double jeopardy claim

A new court martial was set for March 19, 2007 [cite news| title = US war objector's trial misfires | publisher = BBC | date = 2007-02-07 | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6340897.stm | accessdate=2007-02-07] rescheduled for July 23, 2007, and then postponed until October 9, 2007,cite news| title = Court issues stay in Watada court-martial| author = Melanthia Mitchell| publisher = Associated Press| date = 2007-05-19 | url = http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/05/ap_watada_warobjector_070519/ | accessdate=2007-05-21] as an appeal based on the issue of double jeopardy delayed the case. Watada is represented by Ken Kagan and Jim Lobsenz with the Seattle law firm Carney Badley Spellman,cite news| title = Watada switches lawyers for second court-martial | publisher = Associated Press | date = 2007-04-06 | url = http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003654034_watada06m.html| accessdate=2007-04-06] who have replaced Eric Seitz.

On the issue of double jeopardy, Joe Piek, spokesman for Fort Lewis, arguedcite news| title = Army expects to retry Watada | author = Mike Barber | publisher = Seattle Post-Intelligencer | date = 2007-02-09 | url = http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/303085_watadaweb09.html | accessdate=2007-05-21] that the rules for courts-martial (MCM Rule 915(c)), [http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/law/mcm.pdf Manual of Courts-Martial United States (2005 Edition)] PDF document.] allow the Army to try Watada again, on the theory that the mistrial is not a decision and that the mistrial was not due to prosecutorial misconduct. Others, including the military defense attorney assigned to Watada, as well as Kagan and Lobsenz, argued that double jeopardy attached at the start of the presentation of evidence. [ [http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/5722/ Jeff Paterson, "Lt. Watada Mistrial Clear Victory,"] Courage to Resist, February 8, 2007.] Rule 907(b)(2)(C) of the MCM states that jeopardy attaches at the "beginning of the presentation of evidence on the merits," raising the possibility that jeopardy attached prior to the declaration of mistrial.

Following the ruling on July 5, 2007, by Lt. Col. John Head, again presiding over Watada's court-martial, that double jeopardy did not apply, Watada's attorneys appealed the ruling to the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals and then to U.S. civilian court. On October 5, 2007, U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin Settle stayed further proceedings until October 26. The Army is challenging the injunction.

On November 8, 2007, the injunction was extended by Judge Settle, who held that Lt. Watada's double jeopardy claim is meritorious, and that there was no evidence presented that it lacks merit. As of March 2008, the Army is preparing a brief challenging Watada's claim and the injunction.

Public reaction

There have been rallies held at the gates of Fort Lewis since the court-martial began; the "Seattle Post-Intelligencer" reported that the first day drew "more than 1,000" supporters, including the actor Sean Penn. [http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/302569_watada06.html "Watada lawyer frustrated as judge narrows defense"] "Seattle Post-Intelligencer", February 6, 2007.] Kelly Dougherty, Executive Director of Iraq Veterans Against the War, agrees: "The charge is unwarranted. They are trying to show others how hard they will be punished if they speak out. Right now the military sees more and more soldiers speaking publicly and it's threatening to them. They are creating an atmosphere of threats and of fear." [http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091806A.shtml Lieutenant Watada Faces New Charges] , "Truthout.org", September 18 2006.]

Besides the ACLU and Iraq Veterans against the War, Veterans for Peace has come out in support. [http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/08/14/18297206.php Military veterans stand behind "illegal war" refuser] , August 14 2006.] Watada has told reporters that "almost every day, someone from the military or the outside sends me some kind of correspondence or approaches me in person to render support or their respect.” [http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-me-watada16oct16,0,4276309,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines Loyal to Country or Conscience?] , "Los Angeles Times", October 16 2006.] On January 4, 2007, two-hundred people gathered at the Federal Building in downtown San Francisco to demonstrate support for Watada, which led to 28 supporters being arrested by local police officers.cite web|url=http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/01/09/18345188.php |title=28 arrested in San Francisco as Watada faces pre-trial hearing in Ft. Lewis, WA.|date=January 9, 2007|accessdate=January 15|accessyear=2007] Amnesty International issued a press release stating that if Lt Watada were convicted and imprisoned, the organization would consider him a "prisoner of conscience and call for his immediate and unconditional release." [http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/0206-04.htm War Objector's 'Freedom of Conscience Must Be Respected,' Asserts Amnesty International] , "Amnesty International" Press Release retrieved from CommonDreams.org]

Others are opposed to Watada's actions, such as Military Families Voice of Victory, who claim that he is helping al-Qaeda and the Communist Party, [http://mfvov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3&Itemid=8 Military Families Rebuke Army Lt. for Refusal to Serve and Alliance with Anti-American Groups] , "Military Families Voice of Victory", June 7 2006.] and some Japanese American veterans, who claim that as a Japanese American he brings shame to the Japanese American community. [http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=5154025 Japanese Americans, Latest Group to Criticize Watada] , "KHNL 8", July 15 2006.] Watada has also reported that although he has not received any open hostility from his fellow soldiers, there is "definitely a tension." [http://armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1870677.php Deployment refuser has no regrets] , "Army Times", June 14 2006.] There was also a large "counter demonstration" at Fort Lewis opposite his supporters. [http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/281518_watada17.html Hearings to open on 'no Iraq' officer: Fort Lewis panel to decide if Watada faces court-martial] , "Seattle Post-Intelligencer", August 17 2006.]

Watada's mother, Carolyn Ho, has become an anti-Iraq War activist. [http://worldcantwait.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3511&Itemid=10 WORLD CAN'T WAIT--DRIVE OUT THE BUSH REGIME] ] The "Seattle Post-Intelligencer" reported that she founded a website to support Watada, at [http://www.thankyoult.org www.thankyoult.org] .

Watada's father, Bob, also became a critic of the war [ [http://www.kpua.net/news.php?id=11275 Father becomes outspoken critic of Iraq war] ] and went on a national tourcite news|title = Paternal Pride: Father Delivers Army Son’s Anti-War Message Nationwide|date = 2006-11-07|author = Beth Freed|publisher = Lone Star Iconoclast|url = http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=734&z=79 |accessdate = 2007-05-22] to raise money for his son's defense, from October 26 to November 17. Ehren Watada was on hand to speak, and shared the stage with other prominent critics of the war, including Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, and Tim Robbins, at the January 27, 2007 anti-war protest in Washington, D.C. [http://thankyoult.live.radicaldesigns.org/content/view/178/ SoCal events with Bob Watada underway] , "thankyoult.org"]

At event called the "Citizens' hearing on the legality of U.S. actions in Iraq" testimony that had been barred from Watada's Courts Martial was heard;cite web| date=January 20 2007| url=http://www.wartribunal.net/ | title=Citizens' hearing on the legality of U.S. actions in Iraq: The Case of Lt. Ehren Watada| accessdate=July 14| accessyear=2007] among those testifying on January 20 and January 21, 2007 were

* Daniel Ellsberg, Vietnam War-era whistleblower who leaked The Pentagon Papers
* Denis Halliday, who coordinated United Nations humanitarian aid to Iraq when he was UN Assistant Secretary-General
* Benjamin G. Davis, law professor
* Marjorie Cohn, President of the National Lawyers' Guild

ee also

*Legality of the Iraq War
*List of Iraq War Resisters
*Command responsibility
*Court-martial
*Crime against peace
*Criticism of the Iraq War
*Nuremberg Principles
*Uniform Code of Military Justice
*War crime
*Ann Wright (Army Colonel who publicly submitted her letter of resignation to then Secretary of State Colin Powell on March 19, 2003, one day before the U.S. invasion of Iraq.)
*Adam Kokesh
*"Doe v. Bush" (Appeals court decision on the constitutionality of the Iraq invasion)

References

External links

* [http://www.thankyoult.org/ Thank You Lt. Ehren Watada] (legal documents at supporters' site)
* [http://www.wartribunal.net/ Citizens' Hearing on the Legality of U.S. Actions in Iraq: The Case of Lt. Ehren Watada, Tacoma, WA, Jan. 20-21, 2007]
*"LewRockwell.com" court-martial coverage by Jeff Paterson " [http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/paterson1.html Lt. Watada Mistrial Clear Victory] "

Video

* [http://www.thankyoult.org/mmedia/statement.html Initial video statement of Lt. Ehren Watada] June 6, 2006.
* [http://www.thankyoult.org/mmedia/vfp109_7jun06.html Initial press conference in support of Lt. Ehren Watada] , Tacoma, Washington. June 7; [http://www.thankyoult.org/mmedia/vfp109_7jun06pc.html Q&A session] following.
* [http://www.pinkyshow.org/archives/episodes/061222/061222_watada.html "Ehren Watada: a Soldier Refuses an Illegal War"] - Video of Lt. Watada's speech in December, 2006, with commentary.
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ9sV3Nmwpg#GU5U2spHI_4 A Soldier's Duty? The Ehren Watada Story] video documentary that views the case from the perspective of supporters, critics and history