- Mihai Racoviţă
Mihai or Mihail Racoviţă (d. July 1744) was a Prince of
Moldavia on three separate occasions (September1703 -February 23 ,1705 ;July 31 ,1707 -October 28 ,1709 ;January 5 ,1716 -October 1726) and Prince ofWallachia on two occasions (between October 1730 andOctober 2 ,1731 , and from September 1741 until his death). His rules overlapped with the ascension ofPhanariotes in theDanubian Principalities - he is considered himself a Phanariote for the duration of his last rule in Moldavia and his rules over Wallachia.Biography
First rules
A local
boyar of the Racoviţă House (and the father ofConstantin Racoviţă ), closely related to theCantacuzino family and the son-in-law ofConstantin Cantemir , Mihai Racoviţă was appointed ruler of Moldavia byAhmed III , the Sultan of theOttoman Empire , but had to continue fighting off other candidates for the throne, as well as their boyar supporters. To counter these, the Prince relied on Greek supporters: notably, his allies were the first members of theRosetti family .These conflics brought an increase in
tax ation, as well as new fiscal demands. He was replaced byAntioh Cantemir , who, by contrast, was seen as an exceptional ruler. Again on the throne, Racoviţă was deposed on orders from the Sultan, and recalled toIstanbul on pressures from Russia's Peter the Great; he was replaced byNicholas Mavrocordatos .He was returned to rule in
Iaşi upon the outbreak of the Austro-Turkish War, given his image as an enemy of theHabsburg Monarchy . When the Habsburg troops entered Moldavia, Racoviţă suffered heavy losses, and called on help from the Nogai Tatars inYedisan . Subsequently, he was able to defeat the infiltrating forces, and had the Habsburg commander executed together with those boyars who had risen against him.Transylvanian campaign and late rules
He was ordered by the Ottomans to pass into
Transylvania with Nogai assistance, where he was to helpFrancis II Rákóczi in his anti-Habsburg rebellion; his campaign met fierce Habsburg resistance inBistriţa , and his retreat was marked by another Habsburg invasion, as well as by the wide-scale plunder of boyar estates by the Nogais (allowed by Racoviţă as payment for their participation in combat). After the incident, he was ousted from the Moldavian throne after his rival Mavrocordatos appealed to the Sultan, was jailed and replaced withGrigore II Ghica .In 1726, Racoviţă presided the Iaşi trial of four Jews from the
Bessarabia n borough ofOniţcani , who stood accused of having ritually murdered a five-year old child onEaster . The defendants were eventually acquitted following diplomatic protests (notably, the French ambassador to the Porte,Jean-Baptiste Louis Picon , remarked that such an accusation was no longer accepted in "civilized countries"). [Oişteanu, p.211-212]His ascension to the throne in
Bucharest came in the context ofPatrona Halil 's Ottoman rebellion, which had toppled Ahmed III and broughtMahmud I as Sultan; Halil's downfall in the following year almost brought about Racoviţă's, but he successfully furnished thePorte with income provided by raised taxes. He died in Istanbul.Notes
References
*
Ion Neculce , "Letopiseţul Ţării Moldovei", Chapters XV-XVIII, XXI
*Andrei Oişteanu , "«Evreul imaginar» versus «Evreul real»" ("«The Imaginary Jew» Versus «The Real Jew»"), in "Mythos & Logos",Editura Nemira , Bucharest, 1998, p.175-263
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.