- Nawwaf Fahd Humood Al-Otaibi
Nawaf Fahad Al Otaibi (born
July 1 ,1972 , inRiyadh ,Saudi Arabia ) is a citizen ofSaudi Arabia who was held inextrajudicial detention in theUnited States Guantanamo Bay detainment camp s, inCuba . [http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/d20060515%20List.pdf list of prisoners (.pdf)] , "US Department of Defense ",May 15 2006 ] His detainee ID number is 501.Identity
The official documents from the
US Department of Defense , and from theRoyal Embassy of Saudi Arabia, Washington DC transliterate Al Otaibi's name differently:
* His name was transliterated as Nawaf Fahad Al Otaibi on the official lists of names released by theUS Department of Defense . [http://www.dod.mil/news/May2006/d20060515%20List.pdf list of prisoners (.pdf)] , "US Department of Defense ",May 15 2006 ]
* His name was transliterated as Nawaf bin Fahd Homoud Al-Otaibi on the press releases from Saudi officials, when he was repatriated onMay 19 2006 .cite web
date=May 19 2006
title=Saudi detainees at Guantanamo returned to the Kingdom; names given
url=http://saudiembassy.net/2006News/News/UsrDetail.asp?cIndex=6226
publisher=Royal Saudi Embassy Washington DC
accessdate=March 7
accessyear=2007]Detained in adult custody, even though he was a minor
On
June 15 2005 Human Rights lawyerClive Stafford Smith identified Al Otaibi as one of a dozen teenage boys held in the adult portion of the prison. [http://www.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=7880 The Kids of Guantanamo Bay] , "Cageprisoners ",June 15 2006 ] According to Smith Al Otaibi was born in November 1987. Smith observed that official US documents referred to his dozen minors solely by their initials, because US law prohibit identifying minors. Official documents referred to Al Otaibi as NAO.Joint Task Force Guantanamo counter-terrorism analysts report that he was born onNovember 7 1972 , inRiyadh , Saudi Arabia.Combatant Status Review Tribunal
Initially the Bush administration asserted that they could withhold all the protections of the
Geneva Conventions to captives fromthe war on terror . This policy was challenged before the Judicial branch. Critics argued that the USA could not evade its obligation to conduct acompetent tribunal s to determine whether captives are, or are not, entitled to the protections ofprisoner of war status.Subsequently the Department of Defense instituted the
Combatant Status Review Tribunal s. The Tribunals, however, were not authorized to determine whether the captives were "lawful combatants" -- rather they were merely empowered to make a recommendation as to whether the captive had previously been correctly determined to match the Bush administration's definition of anenemy combatant .ummary of Evidence memo
A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Nawaf Fahad Al Otaibi's Combatant Status Review Tribunal, on
24 September 2004 .cite web
url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000400-000499.pdf#28
title=Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal -- Al Otaibi, Nawaf Fahad
date=24 September 2004
author=OARDEC
pages=page 28
publisher=United States Department of Defense
accessdate=2007-11-20] The memo listed the following allegations against him::"'The detainee is
associated with the Taliban and al Qaida::#The detainee traveled from his home in Saudi Arabia toAfghanistan in June 2001.:#The detainee stayed at aTaliban house while in route sic toAfghanistan .:#The detainee went to Afghanistan for the specific purpose of obtaining training at anal Qaida training camp .:#The detainee was identified as possibly having stayed in aTaliban guesthouse .:#The detainee's name was listed on a file seized from an al Qaida safehouse.Transcript
There is no record thatAl Otaibi chose to participate in his Combatant Status Review Tribunal.
Administrative Review Board hearing
Detainees who were determined to have been properly classified as "enemy combatants" were scheduled to have their dossier reviewed at annual
Administrative Review Board hearings. The Administrative Review Boards weren't authorized to review whether a detainee qualified for POW status, and they weren't authorized to review whether a detainee should have been classified as an "enemy combatant".They were authorized to consider whether a detainee should continue to be detained by the United States, because they continued to pose a threat -- or whether they could safely be repatriated to the custody of their home country, or whether they could be set free.
ummary of Evidence memo
A Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for Nawaf Fahad Al Otaibi's Administrative Review Board, on
11 February 2005 .The Department of Defense released multiple versions of this file in March 2006 and September 2007.OnMarch 3 2006 . cite web
url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Factors_Set_1_944-1045.pdf#86
title=Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of
date=11 February 2005
author=OARDEC
pages=pages 86-87
publisher=United States Department of Defense
accessdate=2007-11-20] cite web
url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_000944-001045.pdf#86
title=Unclassified Summary of Evidence for Administrative Review Board in the case of Al Otaibi, Nawaf Fahad
date=11 February 2005
author=OARDEC
pages=pages 86-87
publisher=United States Department of Defense
accessdate=2007-11-20] The memo listed factors for and against his continued detention."The following primary factors favor continued detention:
:""'a. Training:#"The detainee traveled to
Afghanistan to train at aLibyan camp .:""'b. Connection/Associations sic:#"The detainee stayed at a
Taliban house while in route sic to Afghanistan.:#"The detainee was identified as being captured inTora Bora .:#"The detainee's name was listed on a file seized from anal Qaida safehouse.:""'c. Intent:#"The detainee traveled from his home in Saudi Arabia to Afghanistan in June 2001.
"The following primary factors favor release or transfer:
:*"The detainee stated that if given the opportunity he would return to Saudi Arabia to reside with his family members and seek employment as a school teacher.:*"The detainee stated that while he was in Afghanistan, he did not receive any training and never possessed a weapon.
Transcript
Captive 501's Board convened on
February 24 2005 .Captive 501 did not attend the Board.His Assisting Military Officer told his Board that captive 501 was "primarily non-communicative" and "unresponsive other than declining to appear and participate".The Department of Defense did not release the transcript from the unclassified session of his Board hearing.
Board recommendations
In early September 2007 the Department of Defense released two heavily redacted memos, from his Board, to
Gordon England , the Designated Civilian Official.cite web
url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Decision_memos_000276-000384.pdf#65
title=Administrative Review Board assessment and recommendation ICO ISN 501
date=26 April 2005
author=OARDEC
publisher=United States Department of Defense
accessdate=2007-11-20
pages=] cite web
url=http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Decision_memos_000276-000384.pdf#66
title=Classified Record of Proceedings and basis of Administrative Review Board recommendation for ISN 501
date=
author=OARDEC
publisher=United States Department of Defense
accessdate=2007-11-20
pages=] The Board's recommendation was unanimous. The memos were so heavily redacted that the recommendation was unclear.The Board relied on intelligence assessments from the
FBI , theCIA , theState Department , and theDeputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Detainee Affairs .Repatriation
The Saudi embassy announced that a Saudi named Nawaf bin Fahd Homoud Al-Otaibi was one of fifteen Guantanamo captives repatriated to Saudi Arabia on
May 19 2006 .cite web
date=May 19 2006
title=Saudi detainees at Guantanamo returned to the Kingdom; names given
url=http://saudiembassy.net/2006News/News/UsrDetail.asp?cIndex=6226
publisher=Royal Saudi Embassy Washington DC
accessdate=March 7
accessyear=2007] cite web
url=http://www.fotofest.org/guantanamo/SaudiReport.pdf
title=The Saudi Repatriates Report
author=Anant Raut ,Jill M. Friedman
date=March 19 2007
accessdate=April 21
accessyear=2007]References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.