Rocket v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario

Rocket v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario

"Rocket v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario", [1990] 2 S.C.R. 232 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the "Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms". The Court struck down a law prohibiting professionals from advertising as it was too broad.

Dr. Rocket and Dr. Price were dentists practicing in Ontario. They started an advertisement campaign to promote their practice. They were charged with violating the prohibition of advertising under the "Health Disciplines Act".

Justice McLachlin, writing for a unanimous Court, held that the Act violated section 2(b) of the "Charter" and it could not be saved under section 1 of the "Charter". Consequently, the law must be struck down.

ee also

* List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)

External links

* [http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/1990/vol2/html/1990scr2_0232.html full text from LexUM]
* [http://www.mapleleafweb.com/scc/public3/decisions/1990_2scr_232_02.html case summary at mapleleafweb.com]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Chief Justice McLachlin — The following is a list of Supreme Court of Canada opinions written by Beverley McLachlin during her tenure on the Court. Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin on November 20, 2007 Contents 1 …   Wikipedia

  • Section Two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — is the section of the Constitution of Canada s Charter of Rights that lists what the Charter calls fundamental freedoms theoretically belonging to everyone in Canada, regardless of whether they are a Canadian citizen, or an individual or… …   Wikipedia

  • R. v. Keegstra — SCCInfoBox case name=R. v. Keegstra full case name=Her Majesty The Queen v. James Keegstra heard date=December 5, 6, 1989 decided date=December 13, 1990 citations= [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697 ruling=The appeal should be allowed. docket=21118 ratio=… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”