- Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem
In
mathematics , the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem is a result that is very useful in establishing the transcendence of numbers. It states that if α1,...,α"n" arealgebraic number s which arelinearly independent over therational number s Q, then arealgebraically independent over Q; in other words theextension field hastranscendence degree "n" over .An equivalent formulation Harv|Baxter|1975|loc=Chapter 1, Theorem 1.4, is the following: If α1,...,α"n" are distinct algebraic numbers, then the exponentials are linearly independent over the algebraic numbers.
The theorem is named for
Ferdinand von Lindemann andKarl Weierstrass . Lindemann proved in 1882 that "e"α is transcendental for every non-zero algebraic number α, thereby establishing that π is transcendental (see below). Weierstrass proved the above more general statement in 1885.The theorem, along with the
Gelfond-Schneider theorem , is generalized bySchanuel's conjecture .Naming convention
The theorem is also known variously as the Hermite-Lindemann theorem and the Hermite-Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem.
Charles Hermite first proved the simpler theorem where the αi are required to be rational integers and linear independence is only assured over the rational integers ["Sur la fonction exponentielle", Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, 77, pages 18-24, 1873.] , a result sometimes referred to as Hermite's theorem [A.O.Gelfond, "Transcendental and Algebraic Numbers", translated by Leo F. Boron, Dover Publications, 1960.] . Although apparently a rather special case of the above theorem, the general result can be reduced to this simpler case. Lindemann was the first to allow algebraic numbers into Hermite's work in 1882 ["Über die Ludolph'sche Zahl", Sitzungber. Königl. Preuss. Akad. Wissensch. zu Berlin, 2, pages 679-682, 1888.] . Shortly after Weierstrass obtained the full result ["Zu Hrn. Lindemann's Abhandlung: 'Über die Ludolph'sche Zahl' ", Sitzungber. Königl. Preuss. Akad. Wissensch. zu Berlin, 2, pages 1067-1086, 1885] , and further simplifications have been made by several mathematicians, most notably byDavid Hilbert .Transcendence of "e" and π
The transcendence of "e" and π are direct corollaries of this theorem.
Suppose α is a nonzero algebraic number; then {α} is a linearly independent set over the rationals, and therefore by the first formulation of the theorem {"e"α} is an algebraically independent set; or in other words "e"α is transcendental. In particular, "e"1 = "e" is transcendental. (A more elementary proof that "e" is transcendental is outlined in the article on
transcendental number s.)Alternatively, using the second formulation of the theorem, we can argue that if α is a nonzero algebraic number, then {0, α} is a set of distinct algebraic numbers, and so the set is linearly independent over the algebraic numbers and in particular "e"α can't be algebraic and so it is transcendental. Now, we prove that π is transcendental. If π were algebraic, 2π"i" would be algebraic too (since 2"i" is algebraic), and then by the Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem "e"2π"i" = 1 (see
Euler's formula ) would be transcendental, which is absurd.A slight variant on the same proof will show that if α is a nonzero algebraic number then sin(α), cos(α), tan(α) and their hyperbolic counterparts are also transcendental.
"p"-adic conjecture
The "p"-adic Lindemann–Weierstrass conjecture is that a "p"-adic analog of this statement is also true: suppose "p" is some
prime number and α1,...,α"n" are "p"-adic numbers which are algebraic over Q and linearly independent over Q, such that for all "i"; then thep-adic exponential s are "p"-adic numbers that are algebraically independent over Q.ee also
*
Proof that e is irrational
*Proof that π is irrational Notes
References
*Citation|last=Baker|first=Alan|title=Transcendental Number Theory|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1975|isbn=052139791X
External links
* [http://nombrejador.free.fr/article/lindemann-weierstrass_ttj.htm Proof's Lindemann-Weierstrass (HTML)]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.