- Jan Baptist van Helmont
Infobox Scientist
name = Jan Baptist van Helmont
box_width =
image_width = 150px
caption = Jan Baptista van Helmont
birth_date =January 12 ,1579
birth_place =Brussels
death_date =December 30 ,1644
death_place =Vilvoorde ,Southern Netherlands
residence =
citizenship =
nationality =Belgian
ethnicity =
field =chemist ,physiologist ,physician
work_institutions =
alma_mater =
doctoral_advisor =
doctoral_students =
known_for =pneumatic chemistry , gas
author_abbrev_bot =
author_abbrev_zoo =
influences =
influenced =
prizes =
religion =
footnotes =Jan Baptist van Helmont (bapt.
January 12 ,1579 [http://people.mech.kuleuven.be/~erik/local_heroes.html Johannes Baptist Van Helmont] ] –December 30 ,1644 ) was anearly modern period Flemishchemist ,physiologist , andphysician . He worked during the years just afterParacelsus andiatrochemistry , and is sometimes considered to be "the founder ofpneumatic chemistry ". [cite book | last = Holmyard | first = Eric John | authorlink = | title = Makers of Chemistry | publisher=Oxford University Press | date=1931 | location=Oxford | pages = 121 ] Van Helmont is remembered today largely for his ideas on spontaneous generation, his 5-year tree experiment, and his introduction of the word "gas" into the vocabulary of scientists.Life
Van Helmont was the youngest of five children of Maria (van) Stassaert and Christiaen van Helmont, a public prosecutor and Brussels council member, who had married in the Sint-Goedele church in 1567. He was educated at Leuven, and after ranging restlessly from one science to another and finding satisfaction in none, turned to medicine. He interrupted his studies, and for a few years he traveled through
Switzerland ,Italy ,France , andEngland .Returning to his own country, van Helmont lived at Antwerp at the time of the great plague in 1605. In 1609 he finally obtained his doctoral degree in medicine. The same year he married Margaret van Ranst, who was of a wealthy noble family. Jan and Margaret lived in
Vilvoorde , near Brussels, and had six or seven children. The inheritance of his wife enabled him to retire early from his medical practice and occupy himself with chemical experiments until his death on the 30th of December 1644.Work
Van Helmont was a man of contradictions. On the one hand, he was a disciple of
Paracelsus (though he scornfully repudiated his errors as well as those of most other contemporary authorities), a mystic and alchemist. On the other hand, he was touched with the new learning based onexperiment that was producing men likeWilliam Harvey ,Galileo Galilei andFrancis Bacon .Van Helmont is regarded as the founder of
pneumatic chemistry [cite book | last = Holmyard | first = Eric John | authorlink = | title = Makers of Chemistry | publisher=Oxford University Press | date=1931 | location=Oxford | pages = 121 ] , as he was the first to understand that there are gases distinct in kind from atmospheric air. The very word "gas " he claimed as his own invention, and he perceived that his "gas sylvestre" (carbon dioxide ) given off by burning charcoal, was the same as that produced byfermenting must , which sometimes renders the air of caves unbreathable.For van Helmont,
air andwater were the two primitive elements. Fire he explicitly denied to be an element, and earth is not one because it can be reduced to water.Van Helmont was a careful observer of
nature , and an exact experimenter who realized thatmatter can neither be created nor destroyedFact|date=November 2007. He performed an experiment to determine where plants get their mass. He grew a willow tree and measured the amount of soil, the weight of the tree and the water he added. After five years the plant had gained about 164 pounds. Since the amount of soil was basically the same as it had been when he started his experiment, he deduced that the tree's weight gain had come from water. Since it had received nothing but water and the soil weighed practically the same as at the beginning, he argued that the increased weight of wood, bark and roots had been formed from water alone.At the same time, chemical principles guided him in the choice of medicines -- undue acidity of the digestive juices, for example, was to be corrected by
alkaline s and vice versa; he was thus a forerunner of the iatrochemical school, and did service to medicine by applying chemical methods to the preparation of drugs.Religious and philosophical opinions
Although a faithful Catholic, he incurred the suspicion of the Church by his tract "De magnetica vulnerum curatione" (1621), which was thought to derogate from some of the miracles. His works were collected and edited by his son
Franciscus Mercurius van Helmont and published byLodewijk Elzevir inAmsterdam as "Ortus medicinae, vel opera et opuscula omnia" in 1648 [cite book | last = Partington | first = J. R. | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = A Short History of Chemistry | publisher = Macmillan | date=1951 | location=London | pages = 44 – 54 ] . "Ortus medicinae" was based on, but not restricted to, the material of "Dageraad ofte Nieuwe Opkomst der Geneeskunst" ("Daybreak, or the New Rise of Medicine"), which was published in 1644 in Van Helmont's native Dutch. In his son Frans's own writings (e.g. "Cabbaiah Denudata" (1677) and "Opuscula philosophica" (1690)) mystical theosophy and alchemy appear in confusion.Over and above the "archeus", he believed that there is the sensitive
soul which is the husk or shell of the immortal mind. Before the Fall the archeus obeyed the immortal mind and was directly controlled by it, but at the Fall men also received the sensitive soul and with it lost immortality, for when it perishes the immortal mind can no longer remain in the body.In addition to the "archeus", which he described as "aura vitalis seminum, vitae directrix", van Helmont believed in other governing agencies resembling the archeus which were not always clearly distinguished from it. From these he invented the term "blas", defined as the "vis motus tam alterivi quam localis." Of" blas" there were several kinds, e.g. blas humanum and blas meteoron; the heavens he said "constare gas materiâ et blas efficiente."
Van Helmont and digestion
Van Helmont wrote extensively on the subject of digestion. In "Oriatrike or Physics Refined" (1662, English translation of "Ortus medicinae ..."), van Helmont addressed earlier ideas on the subject, such as that food was digested due to the body's internal heat. If such was the case, van Helmont argued, how could cold-blooded animals live? His own opinion was that digestion was aided by a chemical reagent, or "ferment", within the body, such as inside the stomach. Harré suggests that in this way, van Helmont's idea was "very near to our modern concept of an enzyme." [cite book | last = Harré | first = Rom | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Great Scientific Experiments | publisher=Oxford University Press | date=1983 | location=Oxford | pages = 33 – 35 ] van Helmont proposed and described six different stages of digestion. [cite book | last = Foster | first = Michael | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Lectures on the History of Physiology | publisher=Dover Publications | date=1970 | location=New York | pages = 136 – 144 ; originally published in 1901 by Cambridge University Press]
Portrait discovered
In 2003, the historian
Lisa Jardine claimed a recently discovered portrait representedRobert Hooke . However, Jardine's hypothesis was disproved by William Jensen of theUniversity of Cincinnati and by the German researcher Andreas Pechtl ofJohannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Fact|date=October 2007. The portrait in fact depicts Jan Baptista van Helmont.For further reading
* Redgrove, I. M. L. and Redgrove, H. Stanley (2003). "Joannes Baptista van Helmont: Alchemist, Physician and Philosopher", Kessinger Publishing.
* Pagel, Walter (2002). "Joan Baptista van Helmont: Reformer of Science and Medicine", Cambridge University Press.
* TheMoldavian prince and scholar,Dimitrie Cantemir , wrote a biography of Helmont, which is now difficult to locate.
* Nature 433, 197 (20 January 2005)doi:10.1038/433197a; Published online 19 January 2005
*Eugene M. Klaaren , " [http://books.google.com/books?id=t8wnAAAAYAAJ&pgis=1 Religious Origins of Modern Science] ",Eerdmans , 1977, ISBN 0802816835, 244 pagesee also
*
Timeline of hydrogen technologies Notes and references
Steffen Ducheyne, Joan Baptiste van Helmont and the Question of Experimental Modernism, Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza, vol.43, 2005, pp. 305-332.
External links
* [http://www.libraries.uc.edu/source/volfour/oesper2.html Identification of a portrait of van Helmont] - earlier misidentified as a picture of
Robert Hooke .
* Ferguson, John (1906). [http://books.google.com/books?id=fJYAAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA381&dq=Oriatrike+van+helmont&as_brr=1 Johann Baptiste van Helmont] , "Bibliotheca Chemica: A Catalogue of the Alchemical, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Books in the Collection of the Late James Young of Kelly and Durris, Esq., LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.S.E.", Glasgow: James Maclehose and Sons, page 381.
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=IPMHAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA22&dq=van+helmont&as_brr=1#PPA22,M1 Moore, F. J.] (1918). A History of Chemistry, New York: McGraw-Hill.
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=fXkJAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA179&dq=van+helmont&as_brr=1 Thomson, Thomas] (1830). The History of Chemistry, London: Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley.
* [http://usuarios.lycos.es/rotedu/Helmont.html "Ortus Medicinae", 1648 ("Origin of Medicine")]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.