- Shebang (Unix)
In
computing , a shebang (also called a hashbang, hashpling, or pound bang) refers to the characters "#!" when they are the first two characters in a script file.Unix-like operating system s take the presence of these two characters as an indication that the file is a script, and try to execute that script using the interpreter specified by the rest of the first line in the file. For instance, shell scripts for theBourne shell start with the first line:#!/bin/sh
More precisely, a shebang line consists of a
number sign and anexclamation point character ("#!"), followed by the (full) path to the interpreter program that will provide the interpretation. The shebang is looked for and used when a script is invoked directly (as with a regular executable), and largely to the end of making scripts look and act similarly to regular executables, to the operating system and to the user.Because the "#" character is often used as the comment marker in scripting languages, the contents of the shebang line will be automatically ignored by the interpreter itself; the shebang line only exists to specify the correct interpreter to be used.
Etymology
The name "shebang" comes from an inexact contraction of "SHArp bang" or "haSH bang" Fact|date=February 2008, referring to the two typical Unix names of the two characters. Unix jargon uses "sharp" or "hash" to refer to the number sign character and "bang" to refer to the exclamation point, hence "shebang". Another theory on "sh" in shebang's name is from default shell
sh
, usually invoked with shebang. [ [http://catb.org/jargon/html/S/shebang.html Jargon File entry for shebang] ]History
The shebang was introduced by
Dennis Ritchie betweenVersion 7 Unix and 8 at Bell Labs. It was then also added to theBSD line at Berkeley (present in 4BSD and activated by default in 4.2BSD) [ [http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/sys1.c.html extracts from 4.0BSD /usr/src/sys/newsys/sys1.c] ] . As Version 8 and later versions were not released to the public, the first widely known appearance of this feature was on BSD.Portability
Shebangs specify
absolute path s to system executables; this can cause problems on systems which have non-standard filesystem layouts (such asGoboLinux orNixOS ). Even when systems have fairly standard paths, it is quite possible for variants of the same operating system to have different locations for the desired interpreter.In the absence of rigidly standardised locations for each interpreter, the shebang would on some systems try to execute something that doesn't exist where the shebang says it is. Therefore shebangs can limit the portability of the file.
Because of this it is not uncommon to need to edit the shebang line after copying a script from one computer to another because the path that was coded into the script may not apply on a new machine, depending on the consistency in past convention of placement of the interpreter. For this and other reasons,
POSIX does not standardize the feature.Often, the program /usr/bin/env can be used to circumvent this limitation.
Another portability problem is the interpretation of the command arguments.Some systems do not split up the arguments; for example, when running the script with the first line like, #!/usr/bin/env perl -wit will be invoked as, /usr/bin/env "perl -w"That is, "perl -w" will be passed as one argument to /usr/bin/env, rather than two arguments, "perl" and "-w". On
Linux , this will lead to the error message, /usr/bin/env: perl -w: No such file or directoryCygwin also behaves this way. Some other systems handle the arguments differently.One way to work around the "perl -w" issue in this particular case would be to omit "-w" from the shebang line and instead add "use warnings;" into the Perl code. The "use warnings;" pragma is available in Perl versions 5.6 and newer.
Plan 9 from Bell Labs demands a shebang when trying to execute a text file because it needs to know how to run the file. For example, a shell script could have the line #!/bin/rcat the top. If one is forgotten, the system would say "exec header invalid."In many
Linux systems,/bin/sh
is asymlink to/bin/bash
, sincebash implements all the commands available in theBourne shell . Some distributions link this to other shells, however.Ubuntu (and futureDebian ) uses/bin/dash
, for instance, for better performance. When script developers erroneously use the#!/bin/sh
in scripts that contain bash-specific commands, they will fail on systems that use a different default shell. The problem can be fixed by using only sh-compatible commands or by explicitly stating#!/bin/bash
as the shebang.As magic number
The shebang is actually a human-readable instance of a magic number in the executable file, the magic byte string being
0x23 0x21
, the two characters' encoding inASCII . (Executable files that do not require an interpreter program start with other magic combinations. SeeFile format for more details of magic numbers.)There have been rumours that some old versions of UNIX look for the normal shebang followed by a space and a slash ("#! /"), but this appears to be untrue [ [http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/#details 32 bit shebang myth] ] .
On unix-like operating systems, new image files are started by the "exec" family functions. This is where the operating system will detect that an image file is either a script or an executable binary. The presence of the shebang will result in the execution of the specified (usually script language) executable. This is described on the solaris and linux man page "execve".
Examples
Some typical interpreters for shebang lines:
*#!/bin/bash
— Execute using theBourne-again shell
*#!/bin/bash -c '/bin/bash'
— Execute usingbash in the/bin/
directory, and calls
inside thebash /bin/
*#!/bin/csh
— Execute usingcsh
, theC shell
*#!/bin/ksh
— Execute using theKorn shell
*#!/bin/awk -f
— Execute using awk program in the/bin/
directory; the -f is necessary; otherwise awk will think its argument is the awk program itself rather than a file that contains it
*#!/bin/sh
— On some systems, such as Solaris, this is theBourne shell . OnLinux systems there is usually no Bourne shell and this is a link to another shell, such as bash. According to theSingle UNIX Specification 's requirements for /bin/sh, such a shell will usually mimic the Bourne shell's behaviour, but be aware that using #!/bin/sh inshell script s may invoke different Bourne-compatible shells on different systems.
*#!/bin/zsh
— Execute usingzsh
, theZ shell
*#!/usr/bin/perl
— Execute usingPerl
*#!/usr/bin/php
— Execute usingPHP . Note: since in PHP the shebang line falls outside the "code block" (<?php ?>), it doesn't act as a comment, so PHP must explicitly ignore it.
*#!/usr/bin/python
— Execute using Python
*#!/usr/bin/lua
— Execute using Lua
*#!/usr/bin/env
— Invocation of some other program using env program in/usr/bin
directory
*#!/usr/bin/ruby
— Execute using Ruby
*#!/usr/bin/tclsh
- Execute using TclShebang lines can also include specific options that will be passed to the interpreter; see the examples below. However, implementations differ widely on how options are parsed.
This file is a shell script, the
Unix equivalent of aDOS batch file :This file is an AWK script: #!/bin/awk -f BEGIN { print "Hello, world!" } # The rest of the AWK script. # ...This file is a
Perl script, to be run with 'warnings' enabled (-w):This file is also a Perl script, but it assumes that the Perl interpreter is in a different place. Also, the Perl interpreter is run without extra warnings being enabled.
This is a different way of invoking a bash script, telling it to print each command before it executes it:
This file is a quine (though it cheats by reading its own source code): #!/bin/cat Any text can be placed below the shebang.
Solving shebang problems with the env program
Invocation via the env program is useful for two purposes:
...searching for a program via the PATH environment variable: #!/usr/bin/env python # # The rest of the Python script ...
...and invoking a program which is itself a
#!
script: #!/usr/bin/env /usr/local/bin/compileAndGo "$@" ...Note that the above shows passing of arguments which won't work if you want "compileAndGo" itself to be found by search path (case 1 above) and be aware that while this method does increase portability, it is not foolproof. While env is almost always
/usr/bin/env
a small number of platforms have it at/bin/env
[ [http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/#details location of env] ] .See also
* binfmt_misc
*File association References
External links
* [http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/ Details about the shebang mechanism on various Unix flavours]
* [http://homepages.cwi.nl/~aeb/std/hashexclam.html #! - the Unix truth as far as I know it] (a more generic approach)
* [http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=shebang&action=Search FOLDOC shebang article]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.