Adventure Activities Licensing Authority

The Adventure Activities Licensing Authority (AALA) is an independent licensing authority for outdoor activity centers in Great Britain. Under the guidance of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), a government body charged with overseeing health and safety in all workplaces, AALA inspect and issue licences to providers. These licences give an assurance that, so far as is reasonably practicable, participants and employees can be 'safe'.

The AALA was created following the Lyme Bay kayaking tragedy in March, 1993. A group of eight pupils and their teacher were accompanied by two instructors from an outdoor centre on the south coast of England. As a result of a series of errors and circumstances, four of the teenagers drowned. The subsequent trial resulted in the prosecution of the parent company and the centre manager. This tragedy accelerated governmental discussions until, in January 1995, the Activity Centres (Young Persons’ Safety) Act 1995 was passed through Parliament in January 1995 and an independent licensing authority, the AALA, was created to bring the act into reality.

The consequences of the AALA have proved to be immense. The Activity Centres (Young Persons’ Safety) Act, only applies to centres, companies or individuals, who make a charge for providing adventurous activities for under 18 year olds. This is only one sector of provision within Great Britain. The Act does not apply to voluntary organisations as long as they are only providing activities to their own members, schools providing for their own pupils, or Her Majesty’s forces when on duty. Despite many providers falling outside the legal remit of AALA, the standards are widely regarded as applying to any organisation providing outdoor activities and would probably, according to Marcus Baillie (the head of inspection services) be used as “the standard” in any court case. It is not clear if provision has declined across the country as a consequence of the Act, but risk analysis and management systems appear to have increased. It is fortunate that the head of inspection services and the inspectors all have extensive experience in the field of outdoor education and are typically well respected within the outdoor community. This adds credibility to AALA and, one hopes, to the field of outdoor education in general. It is difficult to predict the future of AALA and the consequences of this on the field. One possibility is the expansion of the remit to increase the range of activities covered. Another possibility is to widen the remit to apply to all providers regardless of the age groups with which they work. Further options might be considered for voluntary organisations. This currently looks very unlikely, primarily due to cost. There is also discussion about a non-statutory scheme for those providers who are outside the remit of the licensing scheme, but again cost of implementation is likely to prove prohibitive. There is, not surprisingly, some debate regarding whether AALA has achieved its original aims following the kayaking tragedy (Loynes, 1996). One study, which focused on sea kayaking, suggests that AALA has had almost entirely positive effects on both quality and quantity of provision in sea kayaking (Woolven, 2004). Empirical data on other activities are not yet available and it appears that no one is currently conducting research in this area.

Although the AALA regulations appear to be working well and are typically well received they may have added force to the culture of over-protection placing, for example, an increased emphasis on safety and administration of risk assessments as opposed to a deeper discussion on educational practices.

See also

* Outdoor education

External links

* [http://www.aala.org Adventure Activities Licensing Authority]