- James George Frazer
Sir James George Frazer (
January 1 ,1854 ,Glasgow ,Scotland –May 7 ,1941 ), was a Scottishsocial anthropologist influential in the early stages of the modern studies ofmythology andcomparative religion . [Mary Beard, "Frazer, Leach, and Virgil: The Popularity (and Unpopularity) of the Golden Bough" "Comparative Studies in Society and History", 34.2 (April 1992:203-224).]His most famous work, "
The Golden Bough " (1890), documents and details similar magical and religious beliefs across the globe. Frazer posited that human belief progressed through three stages: primitive magic, replaced by religion, in turn replaced by science.Biography
He studied at the
University of Glasgow andTrinity College, Cambridge , where he graduated with honors inClassics (his dissertation would be published years later as "The Growth ofPlato 's Ideal Theory") and remained a Classics Fellow all his life. He went on from Trinity to study law at theMiddle Temple and yet never practised. He was four times elected to Trinity's Title Alpha Fellowship, and was associated with the college for most of his life, except for a year, 1907-1908, spent at theUniversity of Liverpool . He was knighted in 1914 . He was, if not blind, then severely visually impaired from 1930 on. He and his wife, Lily, died within a few hours of each other. They are buried at the Ascension Parish Burial Ground inCambridge ,England .The study of myth and
religion became his areas of expertise. Except forItaly andGreece , Frazer was not widely traveled. His prime sources of data were ancient histories and questionnaires mailed to missionaries and Imperial officials all over the globe. Frazer's interest in social anthropology was aroused by readingE. B. Tylor 's "Primitive Culture" (1871) and encouraged by his friend, the biblical scholarWilliam Robertson Smith , who was linking the Old Testament with early Hebrew folklore.Frazer was far from being the first to study religions dispassionately, as a cultural phenomenon rather than from within theology. He was, though, the first to detail the relations between
myths and rituals . His theories oftotemism were superseded byClaude Lévi-Strauss and his vision of the annual sacrifice of theYear King has not been borne out by field studies. His generation's choice ofDarwinian evolution as a socialparadigm , interpreted by Frazer as three rising stages of human progress -- magic giving rise to religion, then culminating in science -- has not proved valid. [Seesocial darwinism andhuman progress .] Yet "The Golden Bough ", his study of ancient cults, rites, and myths, including their parallels with earlyChristianity , arguably his greatest work, is still rifled by modern mythographers for its detailed information. Notably, "The Golden Bough" influencedRené Girard ; and led him to study anthropology to develop hismimesis theory of thescapegoat . The work's influence spilled well over the conventional bounds of academia, however; the symbolic cycle of life, death and rebirth which Frazer divined behind myths of all pedigrees captivated a whole generation of artists and poets. Perhaps the most notable product of this fascination isT. S. Eliot 's "The Waste Land ". More recently it was an influence on the ending ofFrancis Ford Coppola 's "Apocalypse Now " (a copy of "The Golden Bough" figures in one of the final shots of the film).The first edition, in two volumes, was published in 1890. The third edition was finished in 1915 and ran to twelve volumes, with a supplemental thirteenth volume added in 1936. He also published a single volume abridgement, largely compiled by his wife Lady Frazer, in 1922, with some controversial material removed from the text. [For the history of "The Golden Bough" see R. Fraser, "The Making of The Golden Bough: The Origins and Growth of an Argument" (London, 1990).]
Jane Ellen Harrison , a respected historian of Greek religion and a Fellow ofNewnham College , Cambridge, gave Frazer's immensely popular work academic credibility, and it has retained the reputation of amiddle-brow classic. [Some non-academioc factors in this middle-brow popularity are the main concern of Mary Beard, "op. cit." below.]Frazer's pioneering work ["For those who see Frazer's work as the start of anthropological study in its modern sense, the site and the cult of Nemi must hold a particular place: This colourful but minor backwater of Roman religion marks the source of the discipline of Social Anthropology", remarks Mary Beard, in noting the critical reassment of Frazer's work following
Edmund Leach , "Frazer, Leach, and Virgil: The Popularity (and Unpopularity) of the Golden Bough" "Comparative Studies in Society and History" 34.2 (April 1992:203-224), p. 204.] has come under criticism by more recent scholars, following a series of critical, even vituperative articles byEdmund Leach , one of which was selected as the lead article in "Anthopology Today ", vol. 1 (1985); [Leach, "Reflections on a visit to Nemi: did Frazer get it wrong?", "Anthropolgy Today" 1 (1985)] in part Frazer's "Golden Bough" was criticised for the breadth of comparisons drawn from widely separated cultures, but the criticism is often based on the abridged edition, which omits the supportive archaeological details. In a positive review of a work narrowly focusing on the "cultus" in the Hittite city of Nerik, J. D. Hawkins remarked approvingly in 1973, "The whole work is very methodical and sticks closely to the fully quoted documentary evidence in a way that would have been unfamiliar to the late Sir James Frazer." [Hawkins, reviewing Volkert Haas, "Der Kult von Nerik: ein Beitrag zur hethitischen Religionsgeschichte", in "Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London" 36.1 (1973:128).]elected works
* "Creation and Evolution in Primitive Cosmogenies, and Other Pieces" (1935)
* "The Fear of the Dead in Primitive Religion" (1933-36)
* "Condorcet on the Progress of the Human Mind" (1933)
* "Garnered Sheaves" (1931)
* "The Growth of Plato's Ideal Theory" (1930)
* "Myths of the Origin of Fire" (1930)
* "Fasti", byOvid (text, translation and commentary), 5 volumes (1929)
** one-volume abridgement (1931)
*** revised byG. P. Goold (1989, corr. 1996): ISBN 0-674-99279-2
* "Devil's Advocate" (1928)
* "Man, God, and Immortality" (1927)
* "The Gorgon's Head and other Literary Pieces" (1927)
* "The Worship of Nature" (1926) (from 1923–25Gifford Lectures , [ [http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse.asp?PubID=TPTWON&
] at www.giffordlectures.org] )
* "The Library", byApollodorus (text, translation and notes), 2 volumes (1921): ISBN 0-674-99135-4 (vol. 1); ISBN 0-674-99136-2 (vol. 2)
* "Folk-lore in the Old Testament" (1918)
* "The Belief in Immortality and the Worship of the Dead", 3 volumes (1913-24)
* "The Golden Bough ", 3rd edition: 12 volumes (1906-15; 1936)
** 1922 one-volume abridgement: ISBN 0-486-42492-8
* "Totemism and Exogamy" (1910)
* "Psyche's Task" (1909)
* "The Golden Bough", 2nd edition: expanded to 6 volumes (1900)
* "Descriptions of Greece", by Pausanias (translation and commentary) (1897)
* "The Golden Bough : a Study in Magic and Religion", 1st edition (1890)
* "Totemism " (1887)ee also
*
Joseph Campbell
*Archetypal literary criticism
*E. B. Tylor References
*Jan Harold Brunvard, "American Folklore; An Encyclopedia", "s.v." "Superstition" (p 692-697)
External links
* [http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/jfrazer.htm Sir James Frazer] : brief analysis
*gutenberg author| id=James+George+Frazer | name=James Frazer
* [http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator:frazer+AND+(creator:james+OR+creator:j.g) Works by James Frazer] at theInternet Archive
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.