- Brook Farm
Infobox_nrhp | name =Brook Farm
nrhp_type =nhl
caption =
location= 670 Baker Street,Boston, Massachusetts
lat_degrees = 42
lat_minutes = 17
lat_seconds = 28.90
lat_direction = N
long_degrees = 71
long_minutes = 10
long_seconds = 26.71
long_direction = W
locmapin = Massachusetts
area =
built =1841
architect= Brook Farm Community
architecture= No Style Listed
designated=July 23 ,1965
added =October 15 ,1966
governing_body = Private
refnum=66000141cite web|url=http://www.nr.nps.gov/|title=National Register Information System|date=2007-01-23|work=National Register of Historic Places|publisher=National Park Service]Brook Farm was a transcendentalist
Utopia n experiment that was put into practice by transcendentalist and formerUnitarian minister George Ripley and his wifeSophia Ripley at the Ellis farm in West Roxbury,Massachusetts . There were originally only fifteen members that included George, his wife Sophia, his sister Marianne, John Sullivan Dwight, and Nathaniel Hawthorne. The community was in operation from 1841 to 1847, and was inspired in 1845 by the socialist concepts ofCharles Fourier . The farm they lived on was influential to many writers like Thoreau andNathaniel Hawthorne .Brook Farm's philosophy
The fundamental ideas of Brook Farm, according to Ripley, were to “combine the thinker and the worker...by opening the benefits of education and the profit of labor to all.” [Richter,"Utopias: Social Ideals and Communal Experiments," 1971.] At Brook Farm, and as in other communities, physical labor was perceived as a condition of mental well-being and health. The farm did not become a phalanx based on Fourierism until 1845.Fact|date=September 2008
Landscape and Architect
Brook Farm was named for the brook that ran near the roadside and that eventually went to the
Charles River . [Gaskill, 299-300 in Myerson] It was surrounded by low hills and its meadows and sunny slopes were diversified by orchard, quiet groves and denser pine woods.When the original founders bought the convert|208|acre|km2 of land there was already a large farm house there, which was later called “The Hive.” The Hive became the center for social activities and was where the people of the community went to eat three meals a day.
As the community grew, it became necessary to add more buildings for lodgings and various activities. The first building constructed was “The Nest,” where school lessons took place and where guests of the farm would stay. Mr. and Mrs. Ripley's house, later to be called the Eyrie, was built during the second year. The next building to be built was Margaret Fuller's cottage. Her home, complete with three pianos, was used by Mr. Dana and other music teachers. The last building constructed was called the Plymouth house and was used for boarding pupils. [Gaskill, 302-303 in Myerson]
Education
Once Brook Farm was purchased, the first six months were spent getting set up. The school was a matter of particular importance, and Mrs. Ripley was in charge of it. On September 29, 1841, the “Brook Farm Institute of Agriculture and Education” was organized. The school was the most immediate (and at times the only) source of income for Brook Farm. They charged a pupil four dollars per week for room, board, and instruction. Every pupil and member of the community was to do one to four hours a day of manual labor on the farm. This work was always deducted from their bills.
When entering the school, each pupil under high school age was assigned a woman of the community who was in charge of his/her wardrobe, personal habits, and exercise. [Ripley 82, in Myerson] The main teachers at the school were Mr. and Mrs. Ripley, Mr. Dwight, and Mr. Dana. Mr. Ripley was in charge of teaching English and was known to be relaxed in his class. Mr. Dana, who could communicate in ten different tongues, was in charge of teaching languages. Mr. Dwight taught music and was quite an attraction for pupils enrolling in the school. [Gaskill 305 in Myerson] Pupils studied European languages and literature. At no extra cost, pupils could also indulge in the fine arts. [Ripley 82, in Myerson]
Within the school there was an infant school for children under six, a primary school for children under ten, and there was a preparatory school that prepared children for college in just six years. If anyone else wanted to take classes, elective classes were available.
Leisure Time
The people of Brook Farm spent most of their time either studying or working the farm, but they always set aside time in the day for play. This time was spent at or participating in dancing parties, picnics, musicals, pageants, plays, and tableaux. The tableaux, in which they acted out scenes from books and plays, were the favorite of all the entertainments. Every week everyone in the community would gather at “The Hive” for a dance of the young ladies of the community. They would wear wreaths of wild daisies on top of their heads, and each week a special wreath, bought from a florist, would be given to the best dressed girl. [Gaskill, 302-303 in Myerson]
“My dress on this occasion was made by my mother. It was simple and was trimmed with flowers.” [Gaskill, 303]
Women at Brook Farm
At Brook Farm, women were empowered and encouraged to showcase their creativity. They did have tasks that were typical of other women at the time such as simple food preparation, and shared house keeping. However, during the harvest time women were allowed to work in the fields and men even helped out with laundry during the cold weather. One of the best things for women at Brook Farm was the fact that no single religion could impose its beliefs on the community. This kept women safe from the typical
patriarchy associated with religion at the time. Women were allowed to go to school and because of the well known education of women at Brook Farm, many female writers and performers visited the farm. George Ripley’s wife Sophia was very educated and was able to teach history and foreign languages at the farm. She even wrote the essay “Woman,” which challenged the images of women created by men.Finances
Brook Farm was originally “financed by the sale of stock, a purchaser of one share automatically becoming a member of the institute, which was governed by a board of directors. The profits, if any, were divided into a number of shares corresponding to the total number of man-days of labour, every member entitled to one share for each day's labour performed.” [ [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9016625 "Brook Farm."] Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 8 Feb. 2008]
In fiction
Nathaniel Hawthorne was a founding member of Brook Farm and presented a fictionalized portrait of it in his novel, "The Blithedale Romance ". (He acknowledged the resemblance in his introduction, saying "in the 'Blithedale' of this volume, many readers will probably suspect a faint and not very faithful shadowing of Brook Farm, in West Roxbury, which (now a little more than ten years ago) was occupied and cultivated by a company of socialists.)" Some have seen a resemblance betweenMargaret Fuller and Hawthorne's fictional character Zenobia. In the novel, a visitor—a writer like Hawthorne—finds that hard farm labor is not conducive to intellectual creativity: :We had pleased ourselves with delectable visions of the spiritualization of labor.... [but] the clods of earth, which we so constantly belabored and turned over and over, were never etherealized into thought. Our thoughts, on the contrary, were fast becoming cloddish. Our labor symbolized nothing, and left us mentally sluggish in the dusk of the evening. Intellectual activity is incompatible with any large amount of bodily exercise. The yeoman and the scholar—the yeoman and the man of finest moral culture, though not the man of sturdiest sense and integrity—are two distinct individuals, and can never be melted or welded into one substance.In
Whit Stillman's 1990 film,Metropolitan , two characters at a party debate whether Brook Farm was a failure or simply "ceased to exist." One character, Charlie Black, ends the argument by saying that ceasing to exist is, to him, failure. [http://www.isi.org/journals/archive/issue.aspx?id=31672594-2837-4440-92eb-d77f73fe6aed]Dissolution
During its later years, the Brook Farm community became more and more committed to Fourierist theories, and committed itself to building an ambitious communal building known as the "phalanstery (phalanstère)." When this building caught fire and burned to the ground in 1846, the community's hopes perished with it. Part of the land on which Brook Farm stood is a nature reserve, part is used by the
Baker Street Jewish Cemeteries .Notes
Further reading
*"Women in Spiritual and Communitarian Societies in the United States." Chmielewski. 1993.
*"A Season in Utopia." Curtis. 1961.
*"Brook Farm." Swift. 1900.
*“The Brook Farm Book A collection of First-Hand Accounts of the Community” Myerson. 1987
*"Brook Farm: the dark side of utopia." Delano, Sterling F. 2004. ISBN 0-674-01160-0External links
* [http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/transcendentalism/ideas/brhistory.html "Transcendental ideas: social reform"] A history of Brook Farm
* [http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/transcendentalism/brook_farm.html History of Brook Farm]
* [http://www25.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/brookfarm.html Dictionary of Unitarian & Universalist Biography. ]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.