- Horror Victorianorum
Horror Victorianorum (terror of the Victorian) is a term devised by the philosopher
David Stove to refer to irrational distaste for, or condemnation of, Victorian culture, art and design. The term was used in Stove's book "The Plato Cult" as part of his argument againstKarl Popper and other philosophers whom he characterised as "modernists". For Stove, Popper was influenced by the pervasive anti-Victorian mentality of the era, epitomised byEvelyn Waugh 's book "A Handful of Dust ", in which the absurdity of Victorian values is expressed by a parody of "Victorian" conceptions of the civilizing mission of imperialism, when the hero is finally trapped in the Amazonian jungle, forced eternally to read the works of Dickens to atribal chief .For Stove, the ascription of absurdity to Victorian culture was essentially a matter of taste, but one so powerful and irrational that it possessed the intensity of religious faith. As a result it produced a revulsion – rather than a reasoned scepticism – to writers such as the Victorian philosopher of science
William Whewell .Following Stove's usage, the term was taken up by the design historian Shelagh Wilson to refer to modernist distaste for
Victorian architecture and design. Wilson argued that "Palissyite" design, influenced by the methods ofBernard Palissy , had been ridiculed and misunderstood by proponents of "Puginite" design, following the proto-modernist principles of Augustus Pugin. Wilson's argument formed part of a reaffirmation of the aesthetic principles of thegrotesque .The argument that distaste for Victorian cultural values ('
Anti-victorianism ') is irrational has been adopted by other writers,ref|nationeither following Stove's politically conservative attack on liberal thought, or Wilson's critique of modernism.Stove's thesis that the Modernists such as Popper rejected Whewell is challenged when one considers
Peter Medawar 's essay on Popper in Schilpp's "The Philosophy of Karl Popper", in which Popper is shown to be, in some respects, a sympathetic elaboration of Whewell. That Whewell anticipates many of Popper's ideas is acknowledged by Popper himself in his reply to Medawar.Notes
#. [http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0377/is_n127/ai_19416356/pg_3 Roger Kinball, "Art Without Beauty", 1997]
Literature
*Stove, D., "The Plato Cult and other Philosophical follies", Blackwell, 1991
*Wilson, S., "Monsters and monstrosities: grotesque taste and Victorian design", in Trodd, Colin, et al (eds.), "Victorian Culture and the Idea of the Grotesque", Ashgate, 1999
ee also
Victorian Era
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.