- John D. Morris
John D. Morris (born 1946) is an American,
young earth creationist . He is the son of "the father ofcreation science ",Henry M. Morris , and the president of theInstitute for Creation Research (ICR).Morris has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from
Virginia Tech (1969), a M.S.,University of Oklahoma (1977), and a Ph.D.,University of Oklahoma (1980) in Geological Engineering. From 1978-1980, he was a research assistant and from 1980-1984, he was an assistant professor of Geological Engineering at theUniversity of Oklahoma .Fact|date=August 2008Morris speaks at a variety of churches, is an author, and serves as a professor of Earth Science and Apologetics at
San Diego Christian College .Controversy and criticism
Critics have disputed some of Morris's claims. For instance, Jim Foley, a contributor to the Usenet talk.origins FAQ list, said this of Morris, regarding Morris's view of "Australopithecus": [cite news | url=http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/a_piths.html| title=Creationist Arguments: Australopithecines| publisher=
Talk.origins | date=1993 | first=Jim | last=Foley | accessdate = 2006-12-11]:
[Morris claimed that] "from the neck down, certain clues suggested to Johanson that Lucy (Australopithecines) walked a little more erect than today's chimps. This conclusion, based on his interpretation of the partial hip bone and a knee bone, has been hotly contested by many paleoanthropologists." Anthropologists, argue that "almost everything in this quote is a distortion (Johanson's and Lucy's names are about the only exceptions)." This is because " 'certain clues suggested' " doesn't mention that the whole find screamed " 'bipedality' " to every qualified scientist who looked at it. As for " 'a little more erect'," when everyone believes that Lucy was fully erect," also " 'the partial hip bone and a knee bone'," when Lucy included almost a completepelvis andleg (taking mirror imaging into account, and excluding the foot)." Lastly, " " 'has been hotly contested'," when no reputablepaleoanthropologist denies that Lucy was bipedal." Rather the debates surrounding Australopithecines "are about whether she was also arboreal, and about how similar the biomechanics of her locomotion was to that of humans." Conclusively, "given that we have most of Lucy's leg and pelvis, one has to wonder what sort of fossil evidence it would take to convince creationists of australopithecine bipedality." [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/a_piths.html]In 1996 Morris claimed that creationist belief the human and dinosaur footprints were found in the
Paluxy River was "at best, ambiguous" and theDuane Gish of the ICR asserted they "are" human and dinosaur tracks together. [Massimo Pigliucci . '. (Sinauer, 2002): ISBN 0878936599 page 246] Pigliucci, citing various volumes of research wrote "there is no controversy surrounding the prints, only the creationists' stubborn refusal to bow to the evidence." [Massimo Pigliucci . '. (Sinauer, 2002): ISBN 0878936599 page 246]Works
*
*
*
* cite book|title=The Modern Creation Trilogy: Scripture and Creation, Science and Creation, Society and Creation
year=1996|id=ISBN 0-89051-216-7
*References
External links
* [http://icr.org The Institute for Creation Research]
* [http://www.icr.org/research/scientists_faculty/ ICR Scientists and Faculty]
* [http://www.answersincreation.org/profiles/john_morris.htm Answers In Creation] Old earth creationist reviews of the claims of John Morris
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.