Reference re Anti-Inflation Act

Reference re Anti-Inflation Act

SCCInfoBox
case-name=Reference re Anti-Inflation Act
full-case-name=Reference re Anti-Inflation Act
heard-date=May 31, June 1 - 4, 1976
decided-date=July 12, 1976
citations= [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373
history=Reference question by the governor in council
ruling=Answered "no" to both questions
ratio=
SCC=1973-1977
Majority=Laskin C.J.
JoinMajority=Judson, Spence and Dickson JJ.
Concurrence=Ritchie J.
JoinConcurrence=Martland and Pigeon JJ.
Dissent=Beetz J.
JoinDissent=de Grandpré J.
NotParticipating=
LawsApplied=

"Reference re Anti-Inflation Act", [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373 was a landmark reference question opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the Anti-Inflation Act. In what has become among the most significant federalism cases of the supreme court, the Act was held to be within the power of the federal government.

The Anti-Inflation Act was passed in 1975, on recommendation of the Bank of Canada, to control the growing inflation of the past several years. Due to growing unease with the Act, the federal government put two questions to the Supreme Court on the validity of the Act. The major question being whether the Act was ultra vires of the federal government.

First, the Court noted that the subject-matter of the Act being "inflation", made it impossible to assign to one of the enumerated powers in the Constitution Act, 1867. Consequently, the Act would only be able to be upheld under the peace, order and good government power under the Constitution which allowed the federal government to legislate in matters related to "emergencies" or matters of "national concern". The Court looked at both options and found that the law could be saved under the "emergency" power of the p.o.g.g. power.

Aftermath

In 1997, the Supreme Court found in the "Provincial Judges Reference" that independent commissions should recommend the salaries of judges. If governments reject the recommendations, the Supreme Court said courts should analyze these rejections in the same way it analyzed the Anti-Inflation Act in this case. In "Provincial Court Judges' Assn. of New Brunswick v. New Brunswick (Minister of Justice)" (2005), the Supreme Court clarified that that did not mean an economic emergency was needed to justify not following recommendations. It merely referred to a reviewing method to determine whether the rejection was rational.

External links

*


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Anti-Inflation Act — The Anti Inflation Act was a Canadian Act of Parliament that was passed in 1975 by Pierre Trudeau s government in order to slow down the rapidly increasing price and wage inflation. The price and wage controls were enforced until 1978 and the Act …   Wikipedia

  • Provincial Judges Reference — ! bgcolor= 6699FF | Case opinions |The Provincial Judges Reference [the three formal titles of the decision are Manitoba Provincial Judges Assn. v. Manitoba (Minister of Justice) from the Manitoba appeal, R. v. Campbell; R. v. Ekmecic; R. v.… …   Wikipedia

  • Reference question — In Canadian law, a Reference Question is a submission by the federal or a provincial government to the courts asking for an opinion on a major legal issue. Typically the question concerns the constitutionality of legislation. The federal… …   Wikipedia

  • Inflation — This article is about a rise in the general price level. For the expansion of the early universe, see Inflation (cosmology). For other uses, see Inflation (disambiguation). Inflation rates around the world in 2007 …   Wikipedia

  • Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act — Full title An Act to promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system, to end too big to fail , to protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts, to protect consumers… …   Wikipedia

  • Davis-Bacon Act — The Davis Bacon Act of 1931 is a United States federal law which established the requirement for paying prevailing wages on public works projects. All federal government construction contracts, and most contracts for federally assisted… …   Wikipedia

  • Davis–Bacon Act — Enacted by the 71st United States Congress Citations Public Law Pub.L. 71 798 Stat. ch. 411, 46  …   Wikipedia

  • Lists of landmark court decisions — Landmark court decisions establish new precedents that establish a significant new legal principle or concept, or otherwise substantially change the interpretation of existing law. In Commonwealth countries, a reported decision is said to be a… …   Wikipedia

  • United States — a republic in the N Western Hemisphere comprising 48 conterminous states, the District of Columbia, and Alaska in North America, and Hawaii in the N Pacific. 267,954,767; conterminous United States, 3,022,387 sq. mi. (7,827,982 sq. km); with… …   Universalium

  • Economic Affairs — ▪ 2006 Introduction In 2005 rising U.S. deficits, tight monetary policies, and higher oil prices triggered by hurricane damage in the Gulf of Mexico were moderating influences on the world economy and on U.S. stock markets, but some other… …   Universalium

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”