RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd.

RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd.

case-name=RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd.
heard-date=December 6 and 7, 1984
decided-date=December 18, 1986
citations= [1986] 2 S.C.R. 573
chief-justice=Dickson C.J.
puisne-justice=Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Wilson and Le Dain JJ.
full-case-name=Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 580, Al Peterson and Donna Alexander v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd.
Majority=McIntyre J.
JoinMajority=Dickson C.J. and Estey, Chouinard and Le Dain JJ.
Concurrence=Wilson J.
ratio=The Charter applies to all codified law but common law only when it is the basis of government action.
history=judgment for defendant (British Columbia Court of Appeal)|

"RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd.", [1986] 2 S.C.R. 573, is the seminal Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms decision that states that the Charter applies to governmental action, and to the common law except where matters are solely between private parties. Nevertheless, judges should interpret the common law in the light of the Charter.


The Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union applied to the court to have Dolphin Delivery and Supercourier declared allies of Purolator, an employer of union members. This would have allowed the union to picket Dolphin while its employees would not have to cross the picket line.

The BC Labour Board declined to hear an application since the dispute was governed under the Canada Labour Code, as "Purolator" was an interprovincial company.

Dolphin obtained an injunction against secondary picketing on their premises on the basis that the common law does not permit secondary picketing.

The action was brought by the union on the basis that their rights to freedom of expression (section 2(b)) and freedom of association (section 2(d)) under the Charter were violated.

Reasoning of the Court

McIntyre, writing for the court, looked at section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, which stated that any law inconsistent with the Charter is of no force or effect. The court stated that this should be interpreted broadly and thus must include both statute law and common law. However, this interpretation needed to be reconciled with section 32 which states that the Charter should apply only to Parliament and legislatures. The Court gave preference to section 32 and stated that the Charter will apply only to common law where the government is involved.

The issue of whether the courts were included within the meaning of government was considered. The Court found that orders from the court did not constitute government action, rather the courts must be the neutral arbiters and cannot be included without unduly widening the scope of the Charter. The legislative, executive, and administrative branches, however, fall within the purview of government.

The final judgement of the court succinctly stated by McIntyre J.(at paras. 1 & 2):

:"1 The Charter does not directly apply to the common law unless it is the basis of some governmental action. ":"2 Even though the Charter does not directly apply to the common law absent government action, the common law must nonetheless be developed in accordance with Charter values.""

To the same effect, see Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, (1995) 2 S.C.R. 1130, R. v. Salituro, (1991) 3 S.C.R. 654, Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., (1994) 3 S.C.R. 835, and R. v. Park, (1995) 2 S.C.R. 836, per L'Heureux-Dubé J.


Much of the principles from this case remain today, with the exception of the opinion that court orders were exempted from Charter scrutiny. "R. v. Rahey", [1987] 1 S.C.R. 58 reversed this and held that all courts are subject to Charter.

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto — SCCInfoBox case name=Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto heard date=February 20, 1995 decided date=July 20, 1995 citations= [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 docket=24216 chief justice=not present puisne justices= La Forest, L Heureux Dubé, Gonthier,… …   Wikipedia

  • History of the Supreme Court of Canada — The history of the Supreme Court of Canada can be divided into three eras. Initially, from the court s inception in 1875 to 1949, it remained largely reserved and conservative.Its decisions could be appealed Judicial Committee of the British… …   Wikipedia

  • Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Canada This article is part of the series: Politics and government of Canada   …   Wikipedia

  • 1986 in Canada — See also: 1985 in Canada, other events of 1986, 1987 in Canada and the list of years in Canada . Incumbents* Monarch Queen Elizabeth II * Governor General Jeanne Sauvé * Prime Minister Brian Mulroney * Premier of Alberta Don Getty * Premier of… …   Wikipedia

  • Section Thirty-two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — concerns the application and scope of the Charter. Only claims based on the type of law contemplated by this section can be brought before the Court. Section 32(1) describes the basis on which all rights can be enforced. Section 32(2) was added… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”