- Laenas
Laenas (plural, Laenates) was the name of a
plebeian noble family inancient Rome , notorious for cruelty and arrogance in the second century BC. The name is said byCicero to be derived from "laena", thesacerdotal cloak carried byMarcus Popillius Laenas (consul359 BC ) when he went to the Forum to quell a popular rising. The family Laenas is therefore a branch of the family Popilli, but the only branch which rose to the consulship.Famous holders of the name are:
* Marcus_Popillius_M.f. Laenas, four times plebeian consul in
359 BC ,356 BC ,350 BC and348 BC , probable ancestor of the next consuls of that name.* Marcus Popillius M.f. Laenas, consul in
316 BC , possibly son of the above*
Marcus Popillius Laenas (consul 173 BC) , notable for conducting a war without the consent of the Senate, and saved from trial (by the tribunes of the plebs) by his brother. Despite this scandal, he became censor in159 BC .*
Gaius Popillius Laenas ,consul in172 BC and158 BC , and brother of the preceding (both being sons of Publius Popillius Laenas). He was sent toGreece in174 BC to allay the general disaffection, but met with little success. He took part in the war againstPerseus , king of Macedonia (Livy xliii.17, 22). WhenAntiochus Epiphanes , king of Syria, invadedEgypt , Laenas was sent to arrest his progress. Meeting him nearAlexandria , he handed him the decree of the Senate, demanding the evacuation of Egypt. Antiochus having asked time for consideration, Laenas drew a circle round him with his staff, and told him he must give an answer before he stepped out of it. Antiochus thereupon submitted (Livy xlv.12;Polybius xxix.11;Cicero , "Philippica", viii.8;Velleius Paterculus i.10).* Marcus Popillius Laenas, consul
139 BC *
Publius Popillius Laenas , son of the preceding. When consul in132 BC he incurred the hatred of the democrats by his harsh measures as head of a special commission appointed to take measures against the accomplices ofTiberius Gracchus . In123 BC Gaius Gracchus brought in a bill prohibiting all such commissions, and declared that, in accordance with the old laws of appeal, amagistrate who pronounced sentence of death against a citizen, without the people's assent, should be guilty of hightreason . It is not known whether the bill contained a retrospective clause against Laenas, but he left Rome and sentence of banishment fromItaly was pronounced against him. After the restoration of the aristocracy the enactments against him were cancelled, and he was recalled. See Cicero, "Brutus", 25.34, and "De domo sua", 31; Vell. Pat. ii.7;Plutarch , "C. Gracchus", 4).References
*1911
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.