- Participatory action research
Action Research or Participatory action research has emerged in recent years as a significant methodology for intervention, development and change within communities and groups. It is now promoted and implemented by many international development agencies and university programs [http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar CCAR] , as well as countless local community organizations around the world.
Overview
Participatory action research is a recognized form of experimental research that focuses on the effects of the researcher's direct actions of practice within a participatory community with the goal of improving the performance quality of the community or an area of concern (Dick, 2002; Reason & Bradbury, 2001; Hult & Lennung, 1980; McNiff, 2002). Action research involves utilizing a systematic cyclical method of planning, taking action, observing, evaluating (including self-evaluation) and critical reflecting prior to planning the next cycle (O'Brien, 2001; McNiff, 2002). The actions have a set goal of addressing an identified problem in the workplace, for example, reducing the illiteracy of students through use of new strategies (Quigley, 2000). It is a collaborative method to test new ideas and implement action for change. It involves direct participation in a dynamic research process, while monitoring and evaluating the effects of the researcher's actions with the aim of improving practice (Dick, 2002; Checkland & Holwell, 1998; Hult & Lennung, 1980). At its core, action research is a way to increase understanding of how change in one's actions or practices can mutually benefit a community of practitioners (McNiff, 2002; Reason & Bradburym, 2001; Carr & Kremmis 1986; Masters, 1995). [http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html Understanding action research] .
:"Essentially Participatory Action Research (PAR) is research which involves all relevant parties in actively examining together current action (which they experience as problematic) in order to change and improve it. They do this by critically reflecting on the historical, political, cultural, economic, geographic and other contexts which make sense of it. … Participatory action research is not just research which is hoped will be followed by action. It is action which is researched, changed and re-researched, within the research process by participants. Nor is it simply an exotic variant of consultation. Instead, it aims to be active co-research, by and for those to be helped. Nor can it be used by one group of people to get another group of people to do what is thought best for them - whether that is to implement a central policy or an organisational or service change. Instead it tries to be a genuinely democratic or non-coercive process whereby those to be helped, determine the purposes and outcomes of their own inquiry." - Wadsworth, Y. (1998) [http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html What is Participatory Action Research?]
The "research" aspects of PAR attempt to avoid the traditional “extractive” research carried out by universities and governments where “experts” go to a community, study their subjects, and take away their data to write their papers, reports and theses. Research in PAR is ideally BY the local people and FOR the local people. Research is designed to address specific issues identified by local people, and the results are directly applied to the problems at hand.
PAR proceeds through repeated cycles, in which researchers and the community start with the identification of major issues, concerns and problems, initiate research, originate action, learn about this action and proceed to a new research and action cycle. This process is a continuous one. Participants in Action Research projects continuously reflect on their learning from the actions and proceed to initiate new actions on the spot. Outcomes are very difficult to predict from the outset, challenges are sizeable and achievements depend to a very large extent on researcher’s commitment, creativity and imagination.
Examples of action research projects dissertations and masters thesis can be easily found by searching the internet. Some universities host sites where the best example of this form of research in [http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/projects.community.html corporate and university organizations] , and [http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/projects.school.html school communities] .
PAR should not be confused with PRA -
Participatory rural appraisal . PRA is an assessment technique that could form part of a PAR process, but does not encompass the full action-reflection cycle.Origins
PAR has many of its roots in social psychology. It builds on the
Action research and Group Dynamics models developed by psychologistKurt Lewin in the early-to-mid 1900s, as well as on the study of oral culture by such scholars asMilman Parry andWalter J. Ong . At its core, PAR revolves around three sets of relationships: relations between individuals within communities and groups, relations between those groups and communities, and relations between people and their physical environment. Management of group dynamics in its many aspects thus plays a central role in PAR processes, and PAR practitioners/facilitators must have a strong foundation in this field.PAR builds on the critical pedagogy put forward by
Paulo Freire as a response to the traditional formal models of education where the “teacher” stands at the front and “imparts” information to the “students” that are passive recipients. This was further developed in "adult education" models throughout Latin America. Friere (1990) wrote,::"The silenced are not just incidental to the curiosity of the researcher but are the masters of inquiry into the underlying causes of the events in their world. In this context research becomes a means of moving them beyond silence into a quest to proclaim the world.”
Based on the work of Freire, it was Colombian sociologist
Orlando Fals-Borda who gave PAR its worldwide recognition by organizing the first PAR conferences in Cartagena, Colombia. Based on his research with peasant groups in rural Boyaca and with other underserved groups, Fals-Borda was able to effectively incorporate the "Community Action" component into the research plans of many traditionally trained researchers. It was not until then that communities started to fully appreciate the benefits of this approach which had initially seemed too abstract for many.Antonio Gramsci is less known for, yet very important in contrtibuting to PAR. Gramsci, writing in early 20th century Italy, argued that all people are intellectuals and philosophers. "Organic intellectuals" is how he terms people who take their local knowledge from life experiences, and use that knowledge to address changes and problems in society. The idea that PAR researchers are really co-learners and researchers with the people they meet in the research process promotes the validity that all people are intellectuals who develop intricate philosophies through lived experience.PAR also has its roots in
phenomenology andpostmodernism . These movements validated experience as a valid way of knowing, very much the foundation of the “action-reflection” model ofExperiential learning and the PAR process. PAR is part of an important shift in paradigm from the traditional, positivist, science paradigm which arose to bring certainty and verifiability to research questions, topostpositivism which recognizes and tries to address complex human and social problems.Finally, PAR has origins within the development discourse.
Recent developments
PAR has evolved through the 1990s and into the 21st century as it has been applied to various fields within international development. For example, participatory plant breeding (PPB) and participatory technology development (PTD) are two techniques that utilize PAR approaches. More methods have been developed to add nuance and solidify key processes of "how" to do PAR, such as participatory development communication (PDC) and
participatory video (PV). Practitioners have also recently tried to move away from the word "research" because of its extractive connotations and abstract meaning to many community and group members. Thus new names (with some new elements) are being used, such as "participatoryaction learning ", "participatory learning-action", and "participatory action development".PAR is a popular method used in teaching
adult learners inlow-income communities, and others how to explore, challenge, and react to their own needs. It is gaining popularity amongcommunity youth workers , as well as middle and senior high school teachers as a successful methodology for engagingyouth voice in the classroom. According to Torre & Fine (2005), "Youth PAR projects are typically centered on issues of intimate, structural violence: educational justice, access to quality healthcare, the criminalization of youth, gang violence, police brutality, race/gender/sexuality oppression, gentrification and environmental issues." PAR is also increasingly used inservice learning projects.Critique
Many, such as
Peter L. Berger and Robert Chambers, point out the intrinsically political nature of PAR. Participation is empowerment and empowerment is politics. Furthermore, it is very difficult for PAR to fully extricate itself from the researcher-community relationship that in itself affects local power dynamics. Community participation in such a context should be recognized for what it is - an externally motivated political act.:"However much the rhetoric changes to participation, participatory research, community involvement and the like, at the end of the day there is still an outsider seeking to change things... who the outsider is may change but the relation is the same. A stronger person wants to change things for a person who is weaker. From this paternal trap there is no complete escape." (Chambers 1983)
Others would point to the irony of citing participatory evangelist Chambers, ally of the World Bank, in a section on critique. Arturo Escobar argues that concepts of participation and sustainability only help to foster a gentler image of development than usual. In some situations, as highlighted by
Diane Rocheleau , participatory methods can also serve as Trojan horses to bring global and environmental restructuring processes directly to rural communities, bypassing national institutional buffers and pre-empting critical review. They can also be manipulated by various actors to deliberately affect power dynamics, often with a more centralizing effect than democratizing, as explored by Triulzi. This point of view was summarised in Bill Cooke and Uma Kothari's" Participation: The New Tyranny ?" in 2001 [ Participation: The New Tyranny? Bill Cooke and Uma Kothari (eds) 2001 London Zed ] .Other resources
* [http://wiki.cofundos.org Cofundos] aims at establishing a prediction market for participatory research funding.
* [http://www.parnet.org/ Participatory Action Research Network (PARNet)] (not active as of Feb. 2007)
* [http://arj.sagepub.com/ Action Research] Journal. Sage Publications. ISSN 1741-2617
*Bessette, Guy. 2004. [http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-52226-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html Involving the Community: A Guide to Participatory Development Communication] . Ottawa: International Development Research Centre. 162pp. ISBN 1-55250-066-7.
*Carr, W. & Kremmis, S.(1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. London: Falmer Press
*Brydon-Miller, M. "Why action research?" In Action Research Volume 1(1): 9–28. SAGE Publications London, Thousand Oaks CA, New Delhi www.sagepublications.co.uk .
* [http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/ Center for Collaborative Action Research at Pepperdine University (CCAR)]
* Burns, D. 2007. Systemic Action Research: A strategy for whole system change. Bristol: Policy Press
*Chambers, R. 1994. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience. "World Development" 22(9):1253-1268.
*Chambers, R. 1983. "Rural Development: Putting the Last First", London: Longman. ISBN 0-582-64443-7.
*Checkland, P., Holwell, S. (1998). Action Research: Its Nature and Validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, Volume 11, (Issue 1, Feb),p 9-21.
* Cooke, Bill and Kothari, Uma. (eds) 2001. "Participation: The New Tyranny?" London: Zed.
*Dick, B. (2002). "Action research: Action and research" Accessed on Feb 3, 2007 from http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/aandr.html.
*Doherty C, & Hope W. (2000). "Shared governance--nurses making a difference." Journal of Nursing Management 2000 March 8(2):77-81.
*Escobar, Arturo. 1992. "Culture, economics, and politics in Latin American social movements theory and research," pp. 62–85 in Arturo Escobar and Sonia Alvarez (eds.), "The Making of Social Movements in Latin America". Boulder: Westview Press.
*Gramsci. A (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith (Eds. & trans.). New York, NY: International Publishers.
* Greenwood, D. J., González Santos, J. L. i Cantón, J. (1991) "Industrial democracy as process: participatory action research in the Fagor Cooperative Group of Mondragón", Assen/Maastricht-Stockholm: Van Gorcum Arbetslivscentrum.
*Hickey, S., and Mohan, G. (2005). "' [http://www.zedbooks.co.uk/book.asp?bookdetail=3746 Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation?:Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development.] "'
*Hult, M., and Lennung, S. (1980). "Towards a Definition of Action Research: A Note and Bibliography," Journal of Management Studies (17:2), 1pp. 242-250.
*Lunch, Chris & Nick. 2006. [http://www.insightshare.org/training_book.html Insights into Participatory Video: a handbook for the field.] Oxford: Insight - free pdf download available
*Madhu, Towards a Praxis Model of Social Work: A Reflexive Account of ‘Praxis Intervention’ with the Adivasis of Attappady unpublished PhD Thesis, 2005 Available at :http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1c/Praxisintervention.pdf
*Masters, J. (1995) 'The History of Action Research' in I. Hughes (ed) Action Research Electronic Reader, The University of Sydney, Accessed online on Feb 2, 2007 at http://www.behs.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm.
*McTaggart, Robin. 1989. [http://www.caledonia.org.uk/par.htm 16 Tenets of Participatory Action Research.]
*McNiff, (2002) Action research for professional development. Accessed online Feb 2, 2007 at http://www.jeanmcniff.com/booklet1.html.
*Narayan, D. 1996. What is Participatory Research? In "Toward Participatory Research". Washington, D.C. World Bank. p. 17-30.
*O'Brien, Rory. 1998. [http://www.web.net/%7Erobrien/papers/arfinal.doc An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research] .
*O'Brien, R. (2001). "An overview of the methodological approach of action research.". In Roberto Richardson (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Action Research. João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba. (English version) Accessed online on Feb. 2, 2007 from http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html.
* [http://www.planotes.org "Participatory Learning and Action" series] Peer reviewed informal journal. [http://www.iied.org/NR/agbioliv/pla_notes/backissues.html Free downloads available]
*Pretty, J.N., Guijt, I., Thompson, J., and Scoones, I. (1995) [http://www.iied.org/pubs/display.php?o=6021IIED&n=1&l=1&t=A%20trainer's%20guide "Participatory Learning and Action: A trainer's guide."] [http://www.iied.org London: International Institute for Environment and Development]
*Pound, B., S. Snapp, C. McDougall, and A. Braun (eds.). 2003. [http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-34000-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation] . Ottawa: Earthscan/IDRC. 260pp. ISBN 1-55250-071-3.
*Quigley, B., 2000, ?The practitioner-research: a research revolution in literacy?, Adult Learning, 11 (3), 6-8.
*Rocheleau, D.E. 1994. Participatory Research and the Race to Save the Planet: Questions, Critique, and Lessons from the Field. "Agriculture and Human Values", Spring-Summer 1994, 25 pp.
*Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds.) (2001) Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 512p
*Selener, D. 1997. Farmer Participatory Research. In "Participatory Action Research and Social Change". Ithaca, New York: The Cornell Participatory ActionResearch Network, Cornell University. p. 149-195.
*Seymour-Rolls, Kaye and Ian Hughes. 2000. [http://www2.fhs.usyd.edu.au/arow/arer/004.htm Participatory Action Research: Getting the Job Done] . "Action Research E-Reports", 4.
*Stringer, E. 2004. "Action Research in Education". Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
*Triulzi, L. 2001. Empty and populated landscapes: the Bedouin of the Syrian Arab Republic between "development" and "state". "Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives", (2), 30-47.
*Vernooy, Ronnie. 2003. [http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-30294-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html Seeds that Give: Participatory Plant Breeding] . Ottawa: International Development Research Centre. 100pp. ISBN 1-55250-014-4.
*Wadsworth, Yolanda. 1998. [http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html What is Participatory Action Research?] Action Research International, Paper 2.ee also
*
Public Participation
*Praxis intervention
*Participatory rural appraisal
*Orality
*References
External links
* [http://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/progress_in_community_health_partnerships/index.html Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action]
* [http://www.incommunityresearch.org/research/yari.htm Youth Action Research Institute]
* [http://www.insightshare.org/act_participatory_research.html Examples of using Participatory Video as a tool for community-led research]
* [http://socialjustice.georgetown.edu/research/yarg/ Georgetown University Youth PAR]
* [http://www.datacenter.org/programs/youth.htm Youth Strategy Project]
* [http://www.freechild.org/PAR.htm Freechild Project PAR webpage]
* [http://www.planotes.org Participatory Learning and Action series]
* [http://learningforsustainability.net/research/action_research.php Participatory action research] - A guide to on-line resources from the [http://learningforsustainability.net/ Learning for Sustainability] site.
* [http://www.uwe.ac.uk/solar/ SOLAR: Social and Organisational Learning as Action Research]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.