- FitzRoy Somerset, 1st Baron Raglan
Field Marshal FitzRoy James Henry Somerset, 1st Baron Raglan, GCB, PC (30 September 1788 –28 June 1855 ), known before 1852 as Lord FitzRoy Somerset, was a Britishsoldier .Early life
He was the eighth and youngest son of
Henry Somerset, 5th Duke of Beaufort , by Elizabeth, daughter of Admiral the Hon.Edward Boscawen . His elder brother, GeneralLord Edward Somerset (1776–1842), distinguished himself as the leader of theHousehold Cavalry brigade at theBattle of Waterloo . Lord Fitzroy Somerset was educated atWestminster School , and entered the army in 1804. In 1807 he was attached to the Hon. Sir Arthur Paget's embassy toTurkey , and the same year he was selected to serve on the staff of Sir Arthur Wellesley in the expedition toCopenhagen . In the following year he accompanied the same general in a like capacity to Portugal, and during the whole of thePeninsular War was at his right hand, first as "aide-de-camp" and then as military secretary.Military career
He was wounded, 5 stab wounds to the left shoulder, at the
Battle of Buçaco , became brevet-major after Fuentes de Onoro, accompanied the stormers of the 52nd light infantry as a volunteer atCiudad Rodrigo and specially distinguished himself at the storming ofBadajoz , being the first to mount the breach, and afterwards securing one of the gates before the French could organize a fresh defence. On6 August 1814 he married Lady Emily Harriet Wellesley-Pole, daughter of the 3rd Earl of Mornington, the Duke of Wellington's niece. During the short period of the Bourbon rule in 1814 and 1815 he was secretary to the British embassy at Paris. On the renewal of the war he again became "aide-de-camp" and military secretary to the Duke of Wellington.At Waterloo he was wounded in the right arm and had to undergo
amputation , but he quickly learned to write with his left hand, and on the conclusion of the war resumed his duties as secretary to the embassy atParis . From 1818 to 1820, and again in 1826–29, he sat in theBritish House of Commons as member for Truro. In 1819 he was appointed secretary to the Duke of Wellington as master-general of the ordnance, and from 1827 till the death of the duke in 1852 was military secretary to him as commander-in-chief. He was then appointedMaster-General of the Ordnance , a Privy Counsellor (16 October 1852 ) and was createdBaron Raglan (20 October 1852 ).Crimean War In 1854 he was promoted to full
General and appointed to the command of the British troops sent to the Crimea in co-operation with a strong French army under Marshal St Arnaud and afterwards, up to May 1855, under Marshal Canrobert. Here his diplomatic experience stood him in good stead in dealing with the generals and admirals, British, French and Turkish, who were associated with him; however, the trying winter campaign of theCrimean War showed that becoming a General was a step too far for Raglan.Lord Raglan and his staff were at the time blamed by the press and the government for the hardships and sufferings of the British soldiers in the terrible Crimean winter before the Siege of Sevastopol, owing to shortages of food and clothing. Lord Raglan was to blame not only for representing matters in a too sanguine light, but also refusing to purchase supplies of wood from the Ottomans to be used for making floors for the tented buildings of the British camp and also to allow the troops to light fires, essential in the bitter damp winter. During this unhealthy winter, the British contingent had 23,000 men unfit for duty due to ill health and only 9,000 fit for duty.
It was afterwards suggested that the chief neglect rested with the home authorities, and indeed the appalling logistical support from England no doubt exacerbated an already poor situation, but the chief cause of the problems is without doubt the wholesale incompetence of the British command on the scene of battle.
His failure to give coherent or timely commands on the field of battle led to numerous mistakes, and his blind ignorance of the growing rivalry between the Earl of Lucan and the Earl of Cardigan would have tragic consequences in the infamous
Charge of the Light Brigade . At Balaklava and Inkerman he displayed a complete lack of any tactical acumen, sending small British units against large Russian contingents; on several occasions this resulted in the complete destruction of the British units. Despite this lack of competence on his part, the battle resulted in an Allied victory, and he was promoted to the rank ofField Marshal .During the trying winter of 1854–55, the suffering he was compelled to witness, the censures which he had to endure, and all the manifold anxieties of the siege seriously undermined his health, and although he found a friend and ardent supporter in his new French colleague, General Pélissier, disappointment at the failure of the assault of
18 June 1855 finally broke his spirit, and very shortly afterwards, onJuly 9 , he died ofdysentery . His body was brought home and interred at Badminton.Heirs
Lord Raglan had two sons:
* The Hon. Arthur William FitzRoy Somerset (born6 May 1816 ). He married (8 July 1845 ), as her first husband,Emile Marie Louise Wilhelmina de Baumbach , daughter of the Baron de Baumbach. A Major in the army, he was wounded at theBattle of Ferozeshah ,21 December 1845 , and died of his wounds on25 December 1845 . As he left no children, the title passed on Lord Raglan's death to:
* Richard Henry Fitzroy Somerset, 2nd Baron Raglan (1817–1884), the second son. He was in turn succeeded by his sonGeorge Fitzroy Henry Somerset, 3rd Baron Raglan .The seaside town of Raglan in
New Zealand was named after the First Lord in 1855.There is a
blue plaque outside his house in Stanhope Gate, London W1.See also
*
Raglan sleeve References
*Hibbert, Christopher. (1961) "The Destruction of Lord Raglan". First published by Longmans, 1961 - published by Pelican, 1963.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.