Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd

Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd

Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd [1920] 2 Ch 124 is a UK company law case concerning amendment of the articles of association.

Contents

Facts

Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd was a shareholder in Llanelly Steel Co. Llanelly realised that Dafen were buying steel from an alternative source of supply, and also to buy up the company's shares (an attempt which failed). Llanelly responded by altering its articles through a special resolution to include a power to compulsorily purchase the shares of any member requested to transfer them. Dafen Tinplate argued the alteration was invalid.

Judgment

The court held that the alteration was too wide to be valid. The altered article would confer too much power on the majority. It went much further than was necessary for the protection of the company. The judge seemed to be using the bona fide for the benefit of the company test in an objective sense, that is, he was judging the situation from the courts point of view.

See also

  • Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd [1900] 1 Ch 656
  • Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co [1919] 1 Ch 290
  • Sidebottom v Kershaw, Leese & Co Ltd [1920] 1 Ch 154
  • Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd [1920] 2 Ch 124
  • Shuttleworth v Cox Bros and Co (Maidenhead) [1927] 1 Ch 154
  • Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701
  • Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • United Kingdom company law — Beside the River Thames, the City of London is a global financial centre. Within the Square Mile, the London Stock Exchange lies at the heart of the United Kingdom s corporations. United Kingdom company law is the body of rules that concern… …   Wikipedia

  • Corporate litigation in the United Kingdom — is that part of UK company law which gives investors the right to sue the directors of a company, or vindicate another wrong to the company, particularly where the board of directors does not wish to act itself. Contents 1 History 1.1 The rule in …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”