birds that feed by following swarms of army ants and take prey flushed by those ants.Willis, E. & Y. Oniki (1978) [http://www.google.co.nz/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Flinks.jstor.org%2Fsici%3Fsici%3D0066-4162(1978)9%253C243%3ABAAA%253E2.0.CO%3B2-M&ei=2Yz1R8mWEIHEgwPrqs3ZBg&usg=AFQjCNHJl5QDV5cPLR8PbTIOQitio1X87A&sig2=aLaS5B5EnslJBOeKrbPkoQ "Birds and Army Ants"] "Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics" 9: 243–263 ] The best known ant-followers are 18 species of antbirdin the family Thamnophilidae, but other families of birds may follow ants including thrushes, chats, ant-tanagers, cuckoos, and woodcreepers. Ant followers may be obligate, meaning that they derive most of their diet by following ant swarms, or non-obligate, meaning they derive only some of their diet from this behaviour. Some species may feed extensively at ant swarms yet may not be obligate ant-followers, being able to and regularly feeding away from the swarms as well.
Many species of tropical
antform large raiding swarms, but the swarms are often nocturnal or raid underground. While birds visit these swarms when they occur, the species most commonly attended by birds is the Neotropicalspecies " Eciton burchellii", which is both diurnaland surface-raiding. It was once thought that attending birds were actually eating the ants, but numerous studies in various parts of "E. burchellii's" range has shown that the ants act as beaters, flushing insects, other arthropods and small vertebrates into the waiting flocks of "ant-followers". Because "E. burchellii" is the only regular diurnal army ant specialised and regular ant-followers mostly occur in its Neotropicalrange, but Afrotropicalbirds do follow driver ants in the genus " Dorylus". [Marcell K. Peters, Smith Likare, Manfred Kraemer (2008) "Effects of habitat fragmentation and degradation on flocks of African ant-following birds". "Ecological Applications" 18(4): 847-858. doi|10.1890/07-1295.1 ]
It was once suggested that the relationship between the obligate and regular ant-followers and the army ants, particularly "Eciton burchellii", was mutualistic, with the ants benefiting by having the birds chase prey back down towards them. However experiments where ant-followers were excluded have shown that the foraging success of the army ants was 30% lower when the birds were present, suggesting that the birds' relationship was in fact parasitic. [Wrege, P.H.; Wikelski, M.; Mandel, J.T.; Rassweiler, T. & I.D. Couzin (2005) " Antbirds parasitize foraging army ants". "Ecology" 86 (3): 555–559] This has resulted in a number of behaviours by the ants in order to reduce
kleptoparasitism, including hiding of secured prey in the leaf litter and caching of food on trails. It has been suggested that the depressive effect of this parasitism slows the development of "E. burchellii" swarms and in turn benefits other ant species which are preyed upon by army ants.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.