Boyd v. United States

Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=
ArgueDate=
ArgueYear=
DecideDate=
DecideYear=
SubmitDate=February 1
SubmitYear=1886
FullName=Boyd and others, Claimants, etc. v. United States
USVol=116
USPage=616
Citation=6 S.Ct. 524; 29 L.Ed. 746
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=A search and seizure is equivalent to a compulsory production of a man's private papers.
SCOTUS=1882-1887
Majority=Bradley
JoinMajority=Field, Harlan, Woods, Matthews, Gray, Blatchford
Concurrence=Miller
JoinConcurrence=Waite
LawsApplied=

"Boyd v. United States", 116 U.S. 616 (1886), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that “a search and seizure [was] equivalent [to] a compulsory production of a man's private papers” and that the search was “an 'unreasonable search and seizure' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.” [116 U.S. 616, 634–35.]

ee also

*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 116
*Exclusionary rule
*"Gouled v. United States" (1921)
*"Andresen v. Maryland" (1976)

References

Further reading

*cite journal |last=Nelson |first=Knute |authorlink=Knute Nelson |coauthors= |year=1923 |month= |title=Search and Seizure: "Boyd v. United States" |journal=ABA Journal |volume=9 |issue= |pages=773 |issn= |url= |accessdate= |quote=
*cite journal |last=Stewart |first=Potter |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1983 |month= |title=The Road to "Mapp v. Ohio" and beyond: The Origins, Development and Future of the Exclusionary Rule in Search-and-Seizure Cases |journal=Columbia Law Review |volume=83 |issue=6 |pages=1365–1404 |doi=10.2307/1122492 |url= |accessdate= |quote=

External links

* [http://www.enfacto.com/case/U.S./116/616/ Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886)] (opinion full text).