- The Game of Diplomacy
Infobox Book
name = The Game of Diplomacy
title_orig =
translator =
image_caption =
author = Richard Sharp
illustrator =
cover_artist =
country = UK
language =
series =
subject =
genre =
publisher = Arthur Barker
pub_date = 1979
english_pub_date =
media_type =
pages = 192
isbn = 0213166763
oclc =
preceded_by =
followed_by ="The Game of Diplomacy" is a book written in 1978 by the late Richard Sharp(Diplomacy player), a Diplomacy veteran who passed away in 2003, about the board game Diplomacy. It popularised "the Hedgehog" and covers all aspects of the game. Although it is debatable there is evidence it may have changed attitudes of many players(see negative reception).
Reception
"Positive:"The book has been described as "Excellently written", "a delight to read" with "a clearly and well designed introduction to ensnare the casual bookstore customer who has never heard of Diplomacy", "an excellent book".
"Negative:"The main criticism of the book is the bias in favour of England and Germany and the negativity towards Austria, Italy, and Turkey. Indeed a total of 69% said they would least like to play as the three latter countries; the total for England and Germany is 17%.
Introduction
Sharp said straight out Diplomacy is not a nice game but rather a better way of channeling negative energy rather than letting it be used for crime. He stated to win you must behave like a complete "cad" (a scoundrel presumably).
On Alliances
Sharp disliked alliances but suggested:
To ally with: England France Germany Italy Austria Turkey Russia England N/A No Yes No No Perhaps Yes France No N/A Yes No No No No Germany No No N/A Yes Yes Yes No Italy Perhaps Yes Yes N/A Yes No Yes Austria No No Yes Yes N/A No Yes Turkey Yes No Yes No No N/A Yes Russia Yes No No No No Yes N/A On stabbing
Sharp stated that the stab is set up by the negotiations preceding it and should only be done when one is completely sure that it will be a blow from which the victim cannot possibly recover.
On relations with the other players
Sharp in Chapter 2 claimed there are a number of types of players and knowing what types of players your opponents are is vital. He states that you should lie about the reasons for the moves and not the moves themselves. Also that even if you play the same player more than once you should "treat every game as a new start".
On the most popular openings
ENG: Northern Opening:Sharp advised the use of the Yorkshire variation claiming this is the only move that will guarantee England a build in 1901.
GER: Blitzkrieg opening(Denmark variation):Although Sharp saw little point in moving to Ruhr he was satisfied with the rest of the opening.
RUS: Southern Defence/defense:Sharp found this opening did not suit aggresive players.
FRA: Maginot opening:Sharp completely rubbished this favouring the Picardy opening.
AUS: Trieste Variation of the Balkan Gambit:
ITA: Tyrolia Attack:
TUR: Russian Attack:
On England
OverallSharp said it is what is always the case with England- the sea makes it difficult for England to be invaded but also to invade anywhere else. He said that the majority of England's defeats are caused by French fleets sneaking into his unguarded rear. He said England could reach 14 supply centers but then be unable to proceed further with any degree of ease.PositionSharp claimed that England's island position was a double-edged sword: good for defence/defense but bad for expansion.
On France
Sharp said France is/was in a good position for taking two supply centers almost immediatley. Again states that France and England must be at war and that France's main problem was over-confidence.
On Germany
Sharp clearly thought highly of Germany regarding Diplomacy. He ended the chapter saying that Germany could be allies with everyone and relax while they tear each other to shreds.
On Austria
Although believing Austria was frequently eliminated early Sharp claimed to like playing as Austria and that the "Hedgehog" manouever and "Anschluss" alliance would give Austria a good chance.
On Italy
On Turkey
On Russia
Release details
*cite book |title=The Game of Diplomacy |last=Sharp |first=Richard |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1979 |publisher=Arthur Barker |location=London |isbn=0213166763 |pages=192 |url=
ources
*cite web |url=http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/god.htm |title=The Game of Diplomacy |accessdaymonth=8 October |accessyear=2008 |author=Richard Sharp |date=1978 |work= |publisher= [http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/ diplomacy-archive.com] "(Book text reproduced on-line.)"
*cite journal | author = Mark Berch | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Book Review — 'The Game of Diplomacy' | journal = Diplomacy World | volume = 22 | issue = | pages = 27-31 | publisher = Jerry Jones | location = Pasadena, CA | publication-date = Summer 1979 | date = 1979 | url = http://www.diplomacyworld.net/pdf/dw22.pdf | doi = | id = | accessdaymonth = 8 October | accessyear = 2008
*cite web |url=http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/resources/strategy/articles/unbalanced.htm |title=Is Diplomacy in the UK Unbalanced? |accessdaymonth=8 October |accessyear=2008 |author=Richard Gee |date=1984 |work= |publisher= [http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/ diplomacy-archive.com]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.