Banque Financiere de la Cite v. Parc (Battersea) Ltd

Banque Financiere de la Cite v. Parc (Battersea) Ltd

"Banque Financiere de la Cite v. Parc (Battersea) Ltd" [1999] [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199798/ldjudgmt/jd980226/banq01.htm 1 AC 221] is a recent and important case in unjust enrichment.

Facts

Parc Ltd had got a loan from a bank called RTB, and given charge over its Battersea land as security. Parc Ltd got a second loan from OOL, which got another charge. BFC, a Swiss bank, gave Parc Ltd a third loan of DM30m but got no charge. Instead it got a ‘postponement letter’ saying other companies in the group (including OOL) would not enforce their charges until BFC had been paid. Parc Ltd used the loan to pay off RTB. But OOL had given no authority to Parc Ltd to give that letter. When Parc Ltd went insolvent, BFC claimed subrogation to be paid in priority of OOL.

Judgment

The House of Lords held that BFC should be subrogated in priority to OOL.

In the course of his judgment, Lord Hoffmann said on the principles behind liability in unjust enrichment, (at 227),

ee also

*Unjust enrichment


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • List of United Kingdom House of Lords cases — This article lists by year the cases heard before the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords. The House of Lords is the only body capable of hearing appeals from the Supreme Court of Judicature of England and Wales (the Court of Appeal, the… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”