- Bona fide purchaser
A bona fide purchaser (BFP)ndash referred to more completely as a bona fide purchaser for value without noticendash is a term used in the
law ofreal property andpersonal property to refer to an innocent party who purchases property without notice of any other party's claim to the title of that property. A BFP must purchase for value, meaning that he or she must pay for the property rather than simply be the beneficiary of a gift. Depending on the laws of the relevantjurisdiction , when a party fraudulently conveys property to a BFP, such as by selling the BFP property that has already been conveyed to someone else, that BFP takes good title to the property despite the competing claims of the other party so long as the BFP properly records the transaction. Other parties with claim to ownership will have a cause of action against the party who made the fraudulent conveyance.A
bona fide purchaser for value without notice will not be bound by equitable interests that he/she does not have actual or imputed notice of, as long as they have taken "such inspections as ought reasonably to have been made" [ "Kingsnorth Finance Trust Co Ltd " v "Tizard" [1986] 1 WLR 783 ] .BFPs are also sometimes referred to as "Equity's Darling." However, as Jeffrey Hackney has pointed out, [Jeffrey Hackney,
Fellow ofWadham College , Oxford, "Understanding Equity and Trusts", ISBN 0-00-686072-9] the title is somewhat misleading; in cases where legal title is passed to a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, it is not so much that equity has any great affection for the purchaser - it is simply that equity refuses to intervene to preserve any rights held by the former beneficial owner of the property. The relationship between thecourts of equity and the BFP are better characterised as benign neglect. However, equity still undoubtedly recognises the right of the beneficial owner to claim against the former legal owner where the sale was improper.In the United States, the
patent law codifies the bona fide purchaser rule, usc|35|261. Unlike thecommon law , thestatute cuts off both equitable "and" legal claims to the title.See also
*
Nemo dat quod non habet
*Title insurance in the United States Footnote
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.