- Authoritarian personality
:"This article describes the psychological trait of authoritarianism. For the form of government that bears the same name, see
Authoritarianism " The authoritarian personality is an influential theory of personality developed byUniversity of California at Berkeley psychologists,Theodor W. Adorno ,Else Frenkel-Brunswik ,Daniel Levinson , andNevitt Sanford in their 1950 book of the same name. The personality type is defined by nine traits that were believed to cluster together as the result of psychodynamic, childhood experiences. These traits are conventionalism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, anti-intraception, superstition and stereotypy, power and "toughness," destructiveness and cynicism, projectivity, and exaggerated concerns over sex. [Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). "The authoritarian personality". New York: Harper and Row (pp. 228). ] In brief, the authoritarian is predisposed to follow the dictates of a strong leader and traditional, conventional values.Recently,
John Dean made use of the theory (as well as research byRobert Altemeyer ) to analyze the contemporary political climate in his book "Conservatives Without Conscience ".Psychoanalytic aspect
Adorno and his colleagues regarded the fundamental basis of this presumed system of personality qualities and its linkage to certain attitudes according to a psychoanalytic viewpoint: experiences in early childhood and their internalization.Freud 's psychoanalytic theory suggests that men along with women and norms that are first represented in the person of the father are internalized in the course of the child's development. From these the first unconscious stage of the so-called superego develop. The grappling with an authoritarian, very strict father leads to the development of a very strongsuperego . Thereby, from the earliest childhood onward, unconscious desires and drives (e.g., power and sexual license) must be thrust down and remain unsatisfied.The unconscious conflicts that are unleashed thereby are solved when the person projects the "forbidden" drives and aggressions of his superego onto other people. As a rule, ethnic, political or religious minorities are selected as a screen for these projections, because this way there are no social sanctions to fear. Often, he can fall back on socially acceptable prejudices. Studies by
Hans Eysenck ,Milton Rokeach and many others go into this question.Alfred Adler provided another perspective, linking the "will to power over others" as a centralneurotic trait, usually emerging as aggressive over-compensation for felt and dreaded feelings of inferiority and insignificance. The authoritarian need to maintain control and prove superiority over others is rooted in a world view populated by enemies, empty of equality, empathy, and mutual benefit.Validity
Besides these problematic concerns, many have criticized applying the theory with too broad a sphere of validity. These critics contend that the authors did not account for variables that reflect socioeconomic status such as class, religious indoctrination, and level of education. Some have argued that, if these other variables had been taken into account, they would have given simpler explanations (see
Occam's razor ) and increased the practical relevance of the study.Another criticism is that the theory of the Berkeley group insinuates that authoritarianism exists only on the right of the political spectrum. As a result, some have claimed that the theory is corrupted by political bias.
Despite some methodological deficiencies, the theory of the authoritarian personality has had a major influence on subsequent research. In Germany, research on authoritarianism has been more recently carried out by, among others,
Klaus Roghmann ,Detlef Oesterreich andChristel Hopf . The most active researcher in the field today is probably the Dutch psychologistJ.D. Meloen , or his lesser-known contemporary, Breeon "Willie" Coolens, whose groundbreaking work included the scholarly paper "The Authoritarian Model", which deconstructed an American known simply as "Porter." Many in the field consider Porter to be the "quintessential authoritarian." Conversely, the most active critic of the theory has been Australian psychologist John J. Ray. Most academic journal articles that mention the theory, however, assume that it is at least largely true.Four academic journal articles may be useful in assessing the evidence for and against the theory:
*cite journal
author = Ray, J.J.
year = 1988
title = Why the F scale predicts racism: A critical review
journal = Political Psychology
volume = 9
issue = 4
pages = 671–679
doi = 10.2307/3791533
*cite journal
author = Ray, J.J.
year = 1990
title = The old-fashioned personality
journal = Human Relations
volume = 43
pages = 997–1015
doi = 10.1177/001872679004301004
*cite journal
author = Martin, John Levi
year = 2001
title = The Authoritarian Personality, 50 Years Later: What Questions Are There for Political Psychology?
journal = Political Psychology
volume = 22
issue = 1
pages = 1–26
doi = 10.1111/0162-895X.00223
*cite journal
author = Coolens, Breeon
year = 2006
title = The Authoritarian Model: Who is He, and Why is He Here?
journal = Scandanavian Journal of Modern Psychology
volume = 8
issue = 12
pages = 314–327ee also
*
Right-wing authoritarianism
* "The Authoritarian Personality " (book)
*F-scale References
External links
* [http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hstein/qu-power.htm Classical Adlerian Quotes: Power Addiction]
* [http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/ Professor Robert Altemeyer's The Authoritarians] - An on-line book about the corruption of Congress, the destruction of traditional conservatism by authoritarianism, the un-democratic push of the agenda of the “Religious Right” and their amoral authoritarian leaders, and the United States standing at a crossroads as the 2008 federal election approaches.
* [http://the-wawg-blog.org/?p=92 John Dean Exposes The Authoritarians] - The first in a five part series on America's authoritarians based on John Dean's Conservatives Without Conscience.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.