- Aequi
The Aequi were an ancient people of north-east
Latium , in centralItaly , whose name occurs constantly inLivy 's first decade as hostile toRome in the first three centuries of the city's existence.History
They occupied the upper reaches of the valleys of the
Anio ,Tolenus andHimella ; the last two being mountain streams running northward to join theNar . Their chief centre is said to have been taken by the Romans about484 BC (Diodorus xi. 40) and again about ninety years later (id. xiv. 106), but they were not finally subdued till the end of the second Samnite war (Livy ix. 45, fx. i; Diod. xx. 101), when they seem to have received a limited form of franchise (Cic. Off. i. n, 35). They fought several battles against the Romans, among which was thebattle of Mons Algidus (458 BC ).All we know of their subsequent political condition is that after the
Social war the folk ofCliternia andNersae appear united in a "res publica Aequiculorum", which was amunicipium of the ordinary type (C.I.L. ix. p. 388). The Latin colonies ofAlba Fucens (304 BC ) andCarsioli (298 BC ) must have spread the use of Latin (or what passed as such) all over the district; through it lay the chief (and for some time the only) route (Via Valeria) toLuceria and the south.At the end of the Republican period the Aequi appear, under the name Aequiculi or Aequicoli, organized as a municipium, the territory of which seems to have comprised the upper part of the valley of the
Salto , still known asCicolano . It is probable, however, that they continued to live in their villages as before. Of theseNersae (mod. Nesc'e) was the most considerable. Thepolygon al terrace walls, which exist in considerable numbers in the district, are shortly described in "Romische Mitteilungen" (1903), 147 seq., but require further study.Language
There are no records about the language spoken by the Aequi before the Roman conquest; however, since the
Marsi , who lived farther east, spoke in the3rd century BC a dialect closely akin to Latin, and since theHernici , their neighbours to the south-west, did the same, it is most likely that all three tribes belonged to the Latian group. From the presence of the "q" letter in their name and the supposed relation between its shorter and its longer form (note that the "i" in the word "Aequiculus" is long -Virgil , "Aen." vii. 744 - which seems to connect it with the locative of "aequum" ("a plain", so that it would mean "dwellers in the plain", although in the historical period they certainly lived mainly in the hills), they could be grouped with the so-called "q" or the "p" dialects: the former includes Latin, which preserved an original "q", while the latter include the dialect ofVelitrae , commonly called Volscian (theVolsci were the constant allies of the Aequi), on the other hand, in which, as in the Iguvine and Samnite dialects, an original "q" is changed into "p". There is no decisive evidence to show whether the "q" in Latin "aequus" represents an Indo-European "q" as in Latin "quis", Umbro-Volsc. "pis", or an Indo-European "k + u" as in "equus", Umb. "ekvo-". The derivative adjective "Aequicus" might be taken to range them with the Volsci rather than theSabini , but it is not clear that this adjective was ever used as a realethnonym ; the name of the tribe is always Aequi, or Aequicoli.References
*1911
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.