Functional discourse grammar

Functional discourse grammar

Functional Discourse Grammar is a grammar theory that explains how linguistic utterances are shaped, based on the goals and knowledge of natural language users. In doing so, it contrasts with Chomskyan transformational grammar. Functional Discourse Grammar has been developed as a successor to Functional Grammar, attempting be more psychologically and pragmatically adequate than Functional Grammar [Hengeveld, K. and Lachlan Mackenzie, J. (2008). "Functional Discourse Grammar", Oxford: Oxford University Press.] .

Principles of Functional Discourse Grammar

There are a number of principles that guide the analysis of natural language utterances according to Functional Discourse Grammar.

The first is that Functional Discourse Grammar explains the phonology, morphosyntax, pragmatics and semantics in one linguistic theory. According to Functional Discourse Grammar, linguistic utterances are built up top-down. That means that first the pragmatic aspects of the utterance are decided upon, then the semantic aspects, then the morphosyntactic aspects, and finally the phonological aspects.

The greatest unit of analysis in Functional Discourse Grammar is the discourse move, not the sentence or the clause. This is a principle that sets Functional Discourse Grammar apart from many other linguistic theories, including its predecessor Functional Grammar.

According to Functional Discourse Grammar, four components are involved in building up an utterance: the conceptual component, which is where the communicative intention that drives the utterance construction arises; the grammatical component, where the utterance is formulated and encoded according to the communicative intention; the contextual component, which contains all elements that can be referred to in the history of the discourse or in the environment; and the output component, which finally realizes the utterance as sound, writing or signing.

The grammatical component consists of four levels: the interpersonal level, which accounts for the pragmatics; the representational level, which accounts for the semantics; the morphosyntactic level, which accounts for the syntax and morphology; and the phonological level, which accounts for the phonology of the utterance.

Example

As an example, we will analyze the utterance "I can't find the red pan. It is not in its usual place" according to Functional Discourse Grammar at the interpersonal level.

At the interpersonal level, this utterance is one discourse move, which consists of two discourse acts, one corresponding to "I can't find the red pan" and another corresponding to "It is not in its usual place".
* The first discourse act consists of:
** A declarative illocutionary force
** A speaker, denoted by the word "I"
** An addressee
** A communicated content, which consists of:
*** A referential subact corresponding to "I"
*** An ascriptive subact corresponding to "find", which has the function Focus
*** A referential subact corresponding to "the red pan", which contains two ascriptive subacts corresponding to "red" and "pan", and which has the function Topic
* The second discourse act consists of:
** A declarative illocutionary force
** A speaker
** An addressee
** A communicated content, which consists of:
*** A referential subact corresponding to "it", which has the function Topic
*** An ascriptive subact corresponding to "in its usual place", which has the function Focus
**** Within this subact there is a referential subact corresponding to "its usual place", which consists of:
***** A referential subact corresponding to "its"
***** An ascriptive subact corresponding to "usual"
***** An ascriptive subact corresponding to "place"

Similar analysis, decomposing the utterance into progressively smaller units, is possible at the other levels of the grammatical component.

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Functional Discourse Grammar — Die Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) ist eine neuere Grammatiktheorie. Von führenden Vertretern der Functional Grammar (FG) wurde sie im ersten Jahrzehnt des 3. Jahrtausends vor allem in Amsterdam in Weiterentwicklung der FG entwickelt. Über… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Functional grammar — is a model of grammar motivated by functions. The model was originally developed by Simon C. Dik at the University of Amsterdam in the 1970s, and has undergone several revisions ever since. The latest standard version under the original name is… …   Wikipedia

  • Functional Grammar — (FG) ist eine linguistische Theorie, die Ende der 1970er Jahre von Simon Cornelis Dik in Amsterdam entwickelt wurde, ausdrücklich als Gegenmodell zum Standard Modell der Transformationsgrammatik von Noam Chomsky. Nach dem Tod Diks 1995 wurde die… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Discourse analysis — Sociolinguistics Areas of study Accent · Dialect Discourse analysis Language v …   Wikipedia

  • Role and Reference Grammar — Die Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) ist eine strukturalistische und funktionale Grammatiktheorie, die von den beiden US amerikanischen Sprachwissenschaftlern Robert D. Van Valin Jr. und William A. Foley in den 1980er Jahren entwickelt wurde.… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Nominal group (functional grammar) — Those five beautiful shiny Jonathan apples sitting on the chair In systemic functional grammar (SFG), a nominal group is a group of words which expresses an entity. A nominal group is widely regarded as synonymous to noun phrase in other… …   Wikipedia

  • Systemic functional grammar — (SFG) or systemic functional linguistics (SFL) is a model of grammar that was developed by Michael Halliday in the 1960s. [http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/Definition/definition.html, accessed 30 July 2008] It is part of a broad social semiotic… …   Wikipedia

  • Corpus-assisted discourse studies — Corpus assisted discourse studies, or CADS, is related historically and methodologically to the discipline of corpus linguistics. The principal endeavor of corpus assisted discourse studies is the investigation, and comparison of features of… …   Wikipedia

  • Stochastic context-free grammar — A stochastic context free grammar (SCFG; also probabilistic context free grammar, PCFG) is a context free grammar in which each production is augmented with a probability. The probability of a derivation (parse) is then the product of the… …   Wikipedia

  • American Sign Language grammar — The grammar of American Sign Language (ASL) is the best studied of any sign language, though research is still in its infancy, dating back only to William Stokoe in the 1960s. Stokoe was the first linguist to approach any sign language as a full… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”