Brian Liddy

Infobox police officer
name = Brian Liddy


caption =
born =
placeofbirth = flagicon|US - Los Angeles, California, USA
nickname =
badgenumber =
department = Los Angeles Police Department
serviceyears = 1990 - 2006
rank = Sworn in as an Officer - 1990
- Sergeant II - 1997
awards = - 1992 Civil Disturbance Ribbon
relations =
laterwork = Executive, Security consultant LAPD Sergeant Brian Liddy, along with Sgt. Edward Ortiz and former Officer Michael Buchanan, were the first to be charged with criminal wrongdoing in the Rampart Scandal. Liddy was the highest-ranking, and the most decorated LAPD police officer to be implicated by Rafael Perez [http://archives.cnn.com/2000/LAW/11/15/lapd.verdict.crim/] ] , based upon Rafael Perez's allegations. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/lapd/interviews/liddy.html] ] His aquittal and subsequent lawsuit (Liddy et al v. City of Los Angeles et al - 2:2008cv03089) [ [dockets.justia.com/docket/court-cacdce/case_no-2:2008cv03089/case_id-415451/] ] have led to serious questions of Perez's credibility.

Early Career

In 1993, almost three years after joining the force in 1990, Liddy was awarded the department's Medal of Valor for actions taken during a shoot-out during the Rodney King riots in 1992, while stationed at the 77th Street Division. [http://www.lapdonline.org/inside_the_lapd/content_basic_view/27325] ] In 1995, Liddy transferred to the Rampart Division's CRASH unit at the same time as Rafael Perez, who would later implicate Sgt. Liddy and over 70 other officers in several instances of police misconduct.

Rampart Scandal

More than 100 criminal cases were overturned after former LAPD Officer Rafael Perez testified that he, his partner and other officers (including Liddy) stationed in the Rampart CRASH unit had routinely framed gang members for crimes they did not commit. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/lapd/scandal/eyeofstorm.html] ] Perez made his allegations in exchange for leniency after he was caught stealing cocaine from a police evidence locker. However, the credibility of Perez has been undermined by his testimony in several internal affairs investigations in which three officers, including Liddy, accused of crimes or misconduct were found not guilty or the charges were dropped. [http://www.streetgangs.com/topics/rampart/051300perez.html] ]

Trial

Liddy, along with Sgt. "Edward Ortiz" and former Officer "Michael Buchanan", were the first to be charged with conspiring to obstruct justice by Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti based on Perez's testimony. The criminal case against the Rampart officers revolved around a 1996 incident in which two reputed gang members were convicted of hitting Buchanan and Liddy with a pickup truck in an alley. Perez told authorities three years later that the officers made up the story to frame the pair. In a highly publicized trial in 2000, a Superior Court jury convicted the three officers of the charges, based of Perez's testimony. Afterward, however, Judge Jacqueline Connor vacated the verdicts, saying she had made a “fatal error” in not recognizing that jurors might have misread some "jargon" in the police report that unintentionally lent support to the claim that the officers had lied.

Lawsuit

After their aquittals, in separate federal civil rights lawsuits filed on August 6, 2005, Liddy and the two other men charged in the trial accused former Los Angeles Police Chief Bernard C. Parks and the LAPD of using them as “scapegoats” to satisfy the media during the scandal involving the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, and that they were charged due to questionable testimony from Perez and other witnesses. [http://articles.latimes.com/2005/aug/07/local/me-rampart7] ]

In his lawsuit, Liddy alleged that a disciplinary board criticized internal affairs investigators for giving questionable facts to witnesses with criminal backgrounds who testified against the officers. The LAPD Board of Rights said the witnesses’ recollections were “potentially tainted by the interview process and raised serious questions regarding their credibility,” according to the lawsuit. The board unanimously overruled discipline for Liddy, his lawsuit states. Disciplinary proceedings against Ortiz were pending. The three plaintiffs also accused the department of concealing from the district attorney’s office the names of witnesses who could have corroborated defense claims that Perez lied in his testimony about the officers.

References