Jablonski by Pahls v. United States

Jablonski by Pahls v. United States

Jablonski by Pahls v. United States, 712 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1983) is a landmark case in which the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a mental health professional's duty to predict dangerousness includes consulting a patient's prior records, and that their duty to protect includes the involuntary commitment of a dangerous individual; simply warning the foreseeable victim is insufficient.

Facts

Mr. Jablonski was dating Ms. Kimball, but had threatened to kill her and her mother (Ms. Pahls). After one incident that culminated in a threat towards her mother, she took him to the Loma Linda VA Hospital, where the doctor conducted a risk assessment, but did not consult his prior records; which documented a history of violent behavior. Based on this incomplete data, he determined, erroneously, that Jablonski was not a danger to himself or others, and released him. He warned Ms. Kimball to leave Jablonski, but did not warn her of his potential for violence. When he was released, he killed her. [cite web
url=http://www.stanford.edu/group/psylawseminar/Tarasoff.Greene.htm
title=Psychiatrist Duties: Tarasoff
accessdate=2008-07-20
work=
author=John M. Greene, M.D.
publisher=Stanford University Department of Psychiatry
date=August 3, 2006]

Ruling

The court ruled that the doctor's failure to secure the patient's previous records constituted negligence, as the information in his files would have affected the risk assessment and thus the actions taken to protect the foreseeable victim. [cite web
url=http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/content/full/34/3/338
title=Warning a Potential Victim of a Person's Dangerousness: Clinician's Duty or Victim's Right?
accessdate=2008-07-20
work=
publisher=Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
date=2006]

Legacy

The legal precedent set by this case extends the duty of the mental health professional to secure previous records when conducting a risk assessment, and the duty to protect to include the involuntary hospitalization of a dangerous individual.

ee also

* Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Jablonski — (also Jabłoński, Jablonsky) is a surname and may refer to:;Jablonski * Benedict Jablonski, a longtime science fiction fan and booster who co designed the Hugo Award * Edward Jablonski, author of several biographies on aviation history and… …   Wikipedia

  • Duty to warn — A duty to warn is a concept that arises in the law of torts in a number of circumstances, indicating that a party will be held liable for injuries caused to another, where the party had the opportunity to warn the other of a hazard and failed to… …   Wikipedia

  • Duty to protect — This article is about the ethical obligation of U.S. mental health professionals. For the international relations concept, see Responsibility to protect. The duty to protect is the responsibility of a mental health professional to protect… …   Wikipedia

  • Duty to predict dangerousness — The duty to predict dangerousness is the legal responsibility of a mental health professional to conduct a thorough risk assessment at any sign of potentially violent ideation. [cite book last = Corey, Corey Callahan first = title = Issues and… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
… Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”