Elaboration likelihood model

Elaboration likelihood model

The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) of persuasion (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) is a model of how attitudes are formed and changed (see also attitude change). Central to this model is the "elaboration continuum", which ranges from low elaboration (low thought) to high elaboration (high thought). The ELM distinguishes between two routes to persuasion: the central route and the peripheral route.

Central route

Central route processes are those that require a great deal of thought, and therefore are likely to predominate under conditions that promote high elaboration. Central route processes involve careful scrutiny of a persuasive communication (e.g., a speech, an advertisement, etc.) to determine the merits of the arguments. Under these conditions, a person’s unique cognitive responses to the message determine the persuasive outcome (i.e., the direction and magnitude of attitude change). So, if favorable thoughts are a result of the elaboration process, the message will most likely be accepted (i.e., an attitude congruent with the messages position will emerge), and if unfavorable thoughts are generated while considering the merits of presented arguments, the message will most likely be rejected (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). In order for the message to be centrally processed, a person must have the motivation and ability to do so.

Peripheral route

Peripheral route processes, on the other hand, do not involve elaboration of the message through extensive cognitive processing of the merits of the actual argument presented. These processes often rely on environmental characteristics of the message, like the perceived credibility of the source, quality of the way in which it is presented, the attractiveness of the source, or the catchy slogan that contains the message. (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986).

Choice of route

The two factors that most influence which route an individual will take in a persuasive situation are motivation (strong desire to process the message; e.g., Petty & Cacioppo, 1979) and ability (actually being capable of critical evaluation; e.g., Petty, Wells, & Brock, 1976). Which route is taken is determined by the extent of elaboration. Both motivational and ability factors determine elaboration. Motivational factors include (among others) the personal relevance of the message topic, accountability, and a person’s "need for cognition" (their innate desire to enjoy thinking). Ability factors include the availability of cognitive resources (e.g., the presence or absence of time pressures or distractions) or relevant knowledge needed to carefully scrutinize the arguments. Under conditions of moderate elaboration, a mixture of central and peripheral route processes will guide information processing.

Additional propositions

In addition to these factors, the ELM also makes several unique proposals (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986).mm

*Attitudes formed under high elaboration are stronger (more predictive of behavior and information processing, more stable over time, more resistant to persuasion) than those formed under low elaboration.
*Variables can serve "multiple roles" in a persuasive setting depending on other contextual factors (examples below).
**Under high elaboration, a given variable (e.g., source expertise) can either serve as an argument (“If Einstein agrees with the theory of relativity, then this is a strong reason for me to as well”) or as a biasing factor (“if an expert agrees with this position it is probably good, so let me see what else agrees with this conclusion” (at the expense of information that disagrees with it)).
**Under conditions of low elaboration, a given variable can act as a peripheral cue (e.g., through the use of an “experts are always right” heuristic – note that while this is similar to the case presented above, this is a simple shortcut, and does not require the careful thought as in the Einstein example above).
**Under conditions of moderate elaboration, a given variable can serve to direct the extent of information processing (“Well, if an expert agrees with this position, I should really listen to what (s)he has to say”). Interestingly, when a variable affects elaboration, this can increase or decrease persuasion, depending on the strength of the arguments presented. If the arguments are strong, enhancing elaboration will enhance persuasion. If the arguments are weak, however, more thought will undermine persuasion.
**More recent adaptations of the ELM (e.g., Petty, Briñol, & Tormala, 2002) have added an additional role that variables can serve. They can affect the extent to which a person has confidence in, and thus trusts, their own thoughts in response to a message (self-validation role). Keeping with our source expertise example, a person may feel that “if an expert presented this information, it is probably correct, and thus I can trust that my reactions to it are informative with respect to my attitude”. Note that this role, because of its metacognitive nature, only occurs under conditions that promote high elaboration.

References

* Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). "Psychology of Attitudes". Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
* Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought Confidence as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Self-validation Hypothesis. "Journal of Personality & Social Psychology", 82, 722-741.
* Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). "Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches". Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
* Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). "Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change". New York: Springer-Verlag.
* Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (eds.), "Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology" (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford Press.

ee also

* Cognitive biases


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Elaboration Likelihood Model — Das Elaboration Likelihood Model (kurz: ELM) ist ein 1986 von Richard Petty und John T. Cacioppo entwickeltes Modell in der Sozialpsychologie. Es beschreibt die Auswirkungen einer persuasiven Mitteilung auf den Empfänger hinsichtlich seiner… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Polytomous Rasch model — The polytomous Rasch model is generalization of the dichotomous Rasch model. It is a measurement model that has potential application in any context in which the objective is to measure a trait or ability through a process in which responses to… …   Wikipedia

  • Competition model — The Competition Model is a psycholinguistic theory of language acquisition and sentence processing developed by Elizabeth Bates and Brian MacWhinney. The Competition Model posits that the meaning of language is interpreted by comparing a number… …   Wikipedia

  • Attitude change — Breckler and Wiggins (1992) define attitudes as “mental and neural representations, organized through experience, exerting a directive or dynamic influence on behavior” (p. 409). Attitudes and attitude objects are functions of cognitive,… …   Wikipedia

  • Attitude (psychology) — Attitude is a hypothetical construct that represents an individual s like or dislike for an item. Attitudes are positive, negative or neutral views of an attitude object : i.e. a person, behaviour or event. People can also be ambivalent towards a …   Wikipedia

  • List of psychology topics — This page aims to list all topics related to psychology. This is so that those interested in the subject can monitor changes to the pages by clicking on Related changes in the sidebar. It is also to see the gaps in Wikipedia s coverage of the… …   Wikipedia

  • ELM — steht für: geographische Objekte Elm (Höhenzug), ein Höhenzug in Niedersachsen (Deutschland) Elm (Steiermark), Berg auf der steirischen Seite des Toten Gebirges ein waldreiches Gebiet im Naturpark Nördlicher Oberpfälzer Wald bei Vohenstrauß… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Einstellung (Psychologie) — Einstellung (in der meist englischen Fachliteratur attitude) bezeichnet in der Psychologie die summarische Gesamtbewertung einer Person, einer sozialen Gruppe, eines Objektes, einer Situation oder einer Idee.[1] Beispiele für Einstellungen sind… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Persuasionsforschung — Persuasive Kommunikation (lat. persuadere = „überreden“) ist eine Art der zwischenmenschlichen Verständigung, die zu etwas überreden will. Das Meinungsbild des Anderen soll also dem eigenen angepasst werden. Es besteht keine Einigkeit über die… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Überreden — Persuasive Kommunikation (lat. persuadere = „überreden“) ist eine Art der zwischenmenschlichen Verständigung, die zu etwas überreden will. Das Meinungsbild des Anderen soll also dem eigenen angepasst werden. Es besteht keine Einigkeit über die… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”