Hush-A-Phone v. United States

Hush-A-Phone v. United States

Infobox COA case
Litigants=Hush-A-Phone Corp. v. United States
Court=United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

ArgueDate=October 4
DecideDate=November 8
FullName=Hush-A-Phone Corporation and Harry C. Tuttle, Petitioners v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Respondents, and American Telephone and Telegraph Company et al., and United States Independent Telephone Association, Intervenors
Citations=238 F.2d 266; 99 U.S. App. D.C. 190; 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4023
Holding=Tariffs on Hush-A-Phone device were unwarranted interference with telephone subscriber's right reasonably to use his telephone in ways which are privately beneficial without being publicly detrimental. FCC order set aside and proceedings remanded.
Judges=Chief Judge Henry White Edgerton; Circuit Judges Wilbur Kingsbury Miller, David L. Bazelon
JoinMajority=Edgerton, Miller
LawsApplied=Communications Act of 1934

"Hush-a-Phone v. United States", 238 F.2d 266 (D.C. Cir. 1956) was a seminal ruling in United States telecommunications law decided by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Hush-a-Phone Corporation marketed a small, cup-like device which mounted on the speaking party's phone, reducing the risk of conversations being overheard and increasing sound fidelity for the listening party. AT&T, citing the Communications Act of 1934, which stated in part that the company had the right to make charges and dictate "the classifications, practices, and regulations affecting such charges," claimed the right to "forbid attachment to the telephone of any device 'not furnished by the telephone company'". It is worth noting that during this era, the phones were leased from the phone company, not owned by the consumer.

Initially, the FCC found in AT&T's favor, but it affirmed the principle that attachments that did not harm the network must be allowed: itfound that the device was a "foreign attachment" subject to AT&T control and that unrestricted use of the device could, in the commission's opinion, result in a general deterioration of the quality of telephone service. ["Phone Company Upheld in Ban on Hush-a-Phone," "The New York Times," February 17, 1951, p. 29]

The court's decision, which exonerated Hush-a-Phone Co. and prohibited further interference by AT&T toward Hush-a-Phone users, stated that AT&T's prohibition of the device was not "just, fair, and reasonable", as required under the Communications Act of 1934, as the device "does not physically impair any of the facilities of the telephone companies", nor did it "affect more than the conversation of the user".

This victory for Hush-a-Phone is widely considered a watershed moment in the development of a secondary market for terminal equipment. It and the related CarterFone decision are seen as precursors to the entry of MCI and the development of more pervasive telecom competition.

ee also



* [ A copy of the court decision from the DC Court of Appeals]

External links

* [ Cybertelecom :: Customer Premise Equipment] - FCC Regulations concerning attachment and marketing of CPE

* [ Voice Silencer on Telephone Lets You Talk in Secret] Popular Mechanics, February 1941

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Hush (film) — For other meanings of this term see the Hush disambiguation page. Infobox Film name = Hush caption = Theatrical release poster director = Jonathan Darby producer = Douglas Wick Helen Whitfield writer = Jonathan Darby Jane Rusconi narrator =… …   Wikipedia

  • News of the World phone hacking scandal investigations — The News of the World phone hacking scandal investigations followed the revelations in 2005 of voicemail interception on behalf of News of the World. Despite wider evidence of wrongdoing, the News of the World royal phone hacking scandal appeared …   Wikipedia

  • List of American words not widely used in the United Kingdom — This is a list of American words not widely used in the United Kingdom.* Words with specific American meanings that have different meanings in British English and/or additional meanings common to both dialects (e.g. pants , crib ) are to be found …   Wikipedia

  • AT&T Corporation — For the 2005 parent company currently known as AT T and formerly Southwestern Bell/ SBC, see AT T. AT T Corp. Type Subsidiary Industry …   Wikipedia

  • Vendor lock-in — Marketing Key concepts Product marketing · Pricing …   Wikipedia

  • Customer-premises equipment — or customer provided equipment (CPE) is any terminal and associated equipment located at a subscriber s premises and connected with a carrier s telecommunication channel(s) at the demarcation point ( demarc ). The demarc is a point established in …   Wikipedia

  • Demarc extension — In telecommunications, a demarc extension is the transmission path originating from the interface of the access provider s side of a telecommunications circuit demarcation point within a premise and ending at the termination point prior to the… …   Wikipedia

  • Business and Industry Review — ▪ 1999 Introduction Overview        Annual Average Rates of Growth of Manufacturing Output, 1980 97, Table Pattern of Output, 1994 97, Table Index Numbers of Production, Employment, and Productivity in Manufacturing Industries, Table (For Annual… …   Universalium

  • Plame affair — (CIA leak) investigation Related topics and issues 2003 invasion of Iraq ( Operation Iraqi Freedom ) Contempt / Obstruction / Perjury Grand jury Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (full text) …   Wikipedia

  • Cult Awareness Network — CAN, the NEW Cult Awareness Network Logo, (New) Cult Awareness Network Formation In 1996, the Church of Scientology purchased assets from Old CAN in United States bankruptcy court 1997, incorporated as Foundation for …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”