- Reiner Protsch
Infobox Scientist
name = Reiner Protsch
box_width =
image_width =
caption =
birth_date = birth date and age|1939|1|14
birth_place =Berlin ,Germany
death_date =
death_place =
residence =
citizenship =
nationality = flag|Germany
ethnicity =
field =Anthropology
work_institutions =University of Frankfurt
alma_mater = UCLA
doctoral_advisor =
doctoral_students =
known_for =
author_abbrev_bot =
author_abbrev_zoo =
influences =
influenced =
prizes =
religion =
footnotes =Reiner Protsch von Zieten (born
January 14 ,1939 inBerlin ) is a Germananthropologist who published falsecarbon dating data of humanfossil s.Protsch von Zieten was an anthropologist and carbon dating specialist at the
University of Frankfurt . He had studied archaeology at theUniversity of California, Los Angeles and got a doctorate in 1973.Over the years, many of the Protsch's colleagues had begun to suspect his expertise. On 2001 archaeologist Thomas Terberger of
University of Greifswald sent fossils Protsch had evaluated for further investigation into theOxford University .Protsch had made serious mistakes in carbon dating. He had dated the skull fragment of the "Hahnhöfersand Man", a supposed
Neanderthal skull, as 36,300 years old when further investigation proved it was only 7500 years old. Another fossil, of the "Binschof-Speyer Woman", which was supposedly 21,300 years old, was actually only 3090 years old. "Paderborn-Sande Man", supposedly 27,400 years old, was from the1700s . In one case he had also claimed that a fossil named "Adapis" had been found inSwitzerland , which would have meant it was a rarity; it was, however, fromFrance , where other specimens had already been found.Terberger and British archaeologist Martin Street published their findings and the University of Frankfurt began an investigation. Protsch dismissed the allegations and later claimed that a lab assistant had failed to remove
shellac from the samples before testing and therefore the results showed later dates.In 2004 investigative journalists of "
Der Spiegel " magazine noticed that Protsch's claims of being a descendent ofPrussia n generalHans Joachim von Zieten were fabricated and therefore his “von Zieten” title was false. He was actually a son of former Nazi party memberWilhelm Protsch . "Der Spiegel" also claimed that Protsch did not really know how to handle his carbon dating equipment, that he ordered the university to destroy evidence ofnazi medical experiments and tried to sell the university'schimpanzee skull collection for $70,000 to an American collector. Protsch claimed that all the disputed fossils were his own property.The University of Frankfurt suspended Reiner Protsch on April 2004. On
February 18 ,2005 the university forced him to retire because of “falsehoods and manipulations.” The university also stated that he was guilty ofplagiarism and had sold university property to collectors.Although the media have claimed that Protsch had a significant effect in the dating of Neanderthals, he has not been a particularly appreciated figure in anthropological circles for a long time. Therefore paleontologists and anthropologists really do not have to "rewrite prehistory" (professor Chris Springer of
London Natural History Museum has stated that the British newspaper "Telegraph" misquoted him).Fact|date=October 2007 None of the fossils Protsch had misdated were scientifically prominent.ources
* "Archaeology" magazine, May/June 2005, page 15.
* [http://skepdic.com/protsch.html "Sceptic's Dictionary" about Reiner Protsch]
* [http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1418104,00.html Article about Protsch in the Guardian UK]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.