- Johann Ruchrat von Wesel
Johann Ruchrat von Wesel (died 1481), German theologian, was born at
Oberwesel early in the 15th century. He appears to have been one of the leaders of the humanist movement inGermany , and to have had some intercourse and sympathy with the leaders of theHussite s inBohemia .Erfurt was in his day the headquarters of a humanism which was both devout and opposed to the realistmetaphysics and the Thomisttheology which prevailed in the universities of Cologne and Heidelberg. Wesel was one of the professors at Erfurt between 1445 and 1456, and was vice-rector in 1458. In 1460 he was appointed preacher atMainz , in 1462 at Worms, and in 1479, when an old and worn-out man, he was brought before the Dominicaninquisitor Gerhard Elten ofCologne . The charges brought against him took a theological turn, though they were probably prompted by dislike of his philosophical views. They were chiefly based on a treatise, "De indulgentiis", which he had composed while at Erfurt twenty-five years before. He had also written "De potestate ecclesiastica". He died under sentence of imprisonment for life in theAugustinian convent inMainz in 1481.It is somewhat difficult to determine the exact theological position of Wesel. Ullmann claims him as a "reformer before the Reformation", but, while he mastered the formal principle of
Protestantism , thatscripture is the sole rule offaith , it is more than doubtful that he had that experimental view of the doctrines of grace which lay at the basis ofReformation theology. He held thatChrist is men's righteousness in so far as they are guided by theHoly Ghost , and the love towardsGod is shed abroad in their hearts, which clearly shows that he held themedieval idea that justification is an habitual grace implanted in men by the gracious act of God. He seems, however, to have protested against certain medieval ecclesiastical ideas which he held to be excrescences erroneously grafted onChristian faith and practice. He objected to the whole system ofindulgence s; he denied theinfallibility of the church, on the ground, that the church contains within itsin ners as well assaint s; he insisted that papal authority could be upheld only when the pope remained true to the evangel; and he held that a sharp distinction ought to be drawn between ecclesiastical sentences and punishments, and the judgments of God.The best account of Wesel is to be found in K. Ullmann's "Reformers before the Reformation". His tract on Indulgences is published in Walch's "Monumenta Medii Aevi", vol. i., while a report of his trial is given in
Ortwin 's "Fasciculus rerum expetendarvm el fugiendarum" (ed. by Browne, London, 1690), and "d'Argentre's Collectio judiciorum de novis erroribus" (Paris, 1728).References
*1911
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.