Industrial Development Consultants v. Cooley

Industrial Development Consultants v. Cooley

"Industrial Development Consultants v. Cooley" [1972] 1 WLR 443 is a UK company law case on the corporate opportunities doctrine, and the duty of loyalty from the law of trusts.

Facts

Mr. Cooley was an architect and the managing director of IDC. The Eastern Gas Board has a lucrative contract going, to design a depot in Letchworth, but they told Mr. Cooley that they did not want to give it to a firm. Mr. Cooley told IDC that he felt a bit poorly and could he resign from his job on early notice. They let him go. He went off and got handsomely compensated. IDC found out. They sued him for breach of his duty of loyalty.

Judgment

Roskill J held that even though there was no chance of IDC getting the contract, if they had been told they would not have released him. So he was held accountable for the benefits he received. He rejected the argument that because he received information privately, Mr. Cooley was under no fiduciary duty. He had ‘one capacity and one capacity only in which he was carrying on business at that time. That capacity was as managing director of the plaintiffs.’ All information which came to him should have been passed on.

Roskill J, quoted, "Parker v. MacKenna" (1874) 10 Ch.App. 96, James L.J. said, at p. 124:

“I do not think it is necessary, but it appears to me very important, that we should concur in laying down again and again the general principle that in this court no agent in the course of his agency, in the matter of his agency, can be allowed to make any profit without the knowledge and consent of his principal; that that rule is an inflexible rule, and must be applied inexorably by this court, which is not entitled, in my judgment, to receive evidence, or suggestion, or argument as to whether the principal did or did not suffer any injury in fact by reason of the dealing of the agent; for the safety of mankind requires that no agent shall be able to put his principal to the danger of such an inquiry as that.”

In the nuclear age that last sentence may perhaps seem something of an exaggeration, but, nonetheless, it is eloquent of the strictness with which throughout the last century and indeed in the present century, courts of the highest authority have always applied this rule.

ee also

*"Keech v. Sandford" (1724) 2 Sel Cas Ch 61
*"Whelpdale v. Cookson" (1747) 1 Ves Sen 9
*"Regal (Hastings) Ltd v. Gulliver" [1967] 2 AC 134n
*"Boardman v. Phipps" [1967] 2 AC 46
*"Bhullar v. Bhullar" [2003] 2 BCLC 241

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • United Kingdom company law — Beside the River Thames, the City of London is a global financial centre. Within the Square Mile, the London Stock Exchange lies at the heart of the United Kingdom s corporations. United Kingdom company law is the body of rules that concern… …   Wikipedia

  • Directors' duties — are a series of statutory, common law and equitable obligations owed primarily by members of the board of directors to the corporation that employs them. It is a central part of corporate law and corporate governance. Directors duties are… …   Wikipedia

  • Directors' duties in the United Kingdom — bind anybody who is formally appointed to the board of directors of a UK company. Contents 1 Scope 2 Duty to act for proper purposes 3 Duty of care 4 …   Wikipedia

  • Board of directors — For other uses of trustee , trusty , and related terms, see Trustee (disambiguation). Board Room redirects here. For the Board Room member lounge, see Alaska Airlines. trustee in trust redirects here. A board of directors is a body of elected or… …   Wikipedia

  • Keech v. Sandford — (1726) Sel Cas. Ch.61; [1558 1774] All ER Rep 230 is a foundational case on the fiduciary duty of loyalty. It concerns the law of trusts and has affected much of the thinking on directors duties in company law.FactsA child had inherited the lease …   Wikipedia

  • Boardman v. Phipps — [1967] 2 AC 46 is an English trusts law case concerning the duty of loyalty and the duty to avoid conflicts of interest.FactsMr Boardman was the solicitor of a family trust. He and a beneficiary, Tom Phipps, went to a shareholders general meeting …   Wikipedia

  • Libya — /lib ee euh/, n. 1. Anc. Geog. the part of N Africa W of Egypt. 2. Italian, Libia. a republic in N Africa between Tunisia and Egypt: formerly a monarchy 1951 69. 5,648,359; 679,400 sq. mi. (1,759,646 sq. km). Cap.: Tripoli. * * * Libya… …   Universalium

  • Proxicom — Infobox Company company name = Proxicom company company type = Private foundation = 1991 location = key people = Paul Cooley, CEO Paul Murray, CFO Blue Van Dyke, EVP, Sales and Marketing Ann Gaglioti, EVP, Operations Tim Warder, SVP, Corp.… …   Wikipedia

  • Special assessment tax — Special assessment is the term used in the United States to designate a unique charge government units can assess against real estate parcels for certain public projects. This charge is levied in a specific geographic area known as a Special… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”