Temperature dependence of liquid viscosity

The temperature dependence of liquid viscosity is the phenomenon by which liquid viscosity tends to fall (or, alternatively, its "fluidity" tends to increase) as its temperature increases. This can be observed, for example, by watching how cooking oil appears to move more fluidly upon a frying pan after being heated by a stove. It is usually expressed by one of the following models:

Exponential model

:$mu(T)=mu\_0\; exp(-bT)$

where "T" is temperature and $mu\_0$ and $b$ are coefficients. See first-order fluid and second-order fluid.This is an empirical model that usually works for a limited range of temperatures.

Arrhenius model

The model is based on the assumption that the fluid flow obeys the Arrhenius equation for molecular kinetics:

:$mu(T)=mu\_0\; exp(\; frac\; \{E\}\{RT\}\; )$

where "T" is temperature, $mu\_0$ is a coefficient, "E" is the activation energy and "R" is the universal gas constant.A first-order fluid is another name for a power-law fluid with exponential dependence of viscosity on temperature.

Williams-Landel-Ferry model

The Williams-Landel-Ferry model, or WLF for short, is usually used for polymer melt's or other fluids that have a glass transition temperature.

The model is:

:$mu(T)=mu\_0\; exp\; left(\; frac\; \{-C\_1\; (T-T\_r)\}\; \{C\_2+\; T\; -T\_r\}\; ight)$

where "T"-temperature, $C\_1$, $C\_2$, $T\_r$ and $mu\_0$ are empiric parameters (only three of them are independent from each other).

If one selects the parameter $T\_r$ based on the glass transition temperature, then the parameters $C\_1$, $C\_2$ become very similar for the wide class of polymers. Typically, if $T\_r$ is set to match the glass transition temperature $T\_g$, we get

:$C\_1\; approx$17.44

and

:$C\_2\; approx$51.6 K.

Van Krevelen recommends to choose

:$T\_r=T\_g+43$ K, then

:$C\_1\; approx$8.86

and

:$C\_2\; approx$101.6 K.

Using such "universal parameters" allows one to guess the temperature dependence of a polymer by knowing the viscosity at a single temperature.

In reality the "universal parameters" are not that universal, and it is much better to fit the WLF parameters from the experimental data.

eeton Fit

The [http://www.springerlink.com/content/n20n33940mn3m213/?p=ce068239764c4feda3bc4176e8144163&pi=7 Seeton Fit] is based on curve fitting the viscosity dependence of many liquids (refrigerants, hydrocarbons and lubricants) versus temperature and applies over a large temperature and viscosity range:

:$ln\; left(\; \{ln\; left(\; \{\; u\; +\; 0.7\; +\; e^\{\; -\; u\; \}\; K\_0\; left(\; \{\; u\; +\; 1.244067\}\; ight)\}\; ight)\}\; ight)\; =\; A\; -\; B*ln\; left(\; T\; ight)$

where "T" is absolute temperature in kelvins, $u$ is the kinematic viscosity in centistokes, $K\_0$ is the zero order modified Bessel function of the second kind, and "A" and "B" are liquid specific values. This form should not be applied to ammonia or water viscosity over a large temperature range.

For liquid metal viscosity as a function of temperature, Seeton proposed:

:$ln\; left(\; \{ln\; left(\; \{\; u\; +\; 0.7\; +\; e^\{\; -\; u\; \}\; K\_0\; left(\; \{\; u\; +\; 1.244067\}\; ight)\}\; ight)\}\; ight)\; =\; A\; -\; \{B\; over\; T\}$

Viscosity of water equation accurate to within 2.5% from 0 °C to 370 °C:

μ (Temp)= 2.414*10^-5 (N·s/m²) * 10^(247.8 K/(Temp - 140 K))
*N - newton
*s - second
*m - meter
*K - kelvin