Zeran v. America Online, Inc.
- Zeran v. America Online, Inc.
"Zeran v. America Online, Inc.", 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), [http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/971523.P.pdf] "cert. denied", 524 U.S. 937 (1998), a case in which the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals determined the liability of internet service providers for wrongs committed by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230(c)(1) of the CDA provides that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." [ [http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode47/usc_sec_47_00000230----000-.html US CODE: Title 47,230. Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material ] ]
Facts
A message was posted on an America Online bulletin board advertising and describing the sale of shirts with "offensive and tasteless slogans" [ Zeran v. America Online, slip op. at 3.] related to the Oklahoma City bombing. Persons interested in purchasing a T-shirt were instructed to call the plaintiff, Kenneth Zeran, whose home phone number was posted in the message but who had not posted the message nor had anything to do with the content of the ad or its posting. The plaintiff called AOL repeatedly to complain over a four-day period in which he continued to receive abusive phone calls. He eventually sued AOL, alleging it had unreasonably delayed in removing defamatory messages and failed to screen for similar postings thereafter.
Opinion of the court
The Fourth Circuit held that each of plaintiff’s claims was barred by the CDA, holding the Section 230 "creates a federal immunity to any cause of action that would make service providers liable for information originating with a third-party user of the service." In the words of the "Zeran" court:: [L] awsuits seeking to hold a service liable for its exercise of a publisher’s traditional editorial functions – such as deciding whether to publish, withdraw, postpone or alter content – are barred. The purpose of this statutory immunity is not difficult to discern. Congress recognized the threat that tort-based lawsuits pose to freedom of speech in the new and burgeoning Internet medium. . . . Section 230 was enacted, in part, to maintain the robust nature of Internet communication . . . ."
References
Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Online service provider law — is a summary and case law tracking page for laws, legal decisions and issues relating to online service providers, like the Wikipedia and internet service providers, from the viewpoint of an OSP considering its liability and customer service… … Wikipedia
Troll (Internet) — Do not feed the trolls and its abbreviation DNFTT redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay, see What is a troll? … Wikipedia
Randall Boe — (1962 ) was General Counsel for AOL and has been involved in many ground breaking cases regarding internet law. He was born in Ohio and grew up in Iowa City, Iowa. He attended the University of Wisconsin Madison and graduated in 1983 with majors… … Wikipedia
Communications Decency Act — Der Communications Decency Act (CDA) war ein Teil des US amerikanischen Telecommunications Act von 1996. Das Gesetz wurde vom US Kongress am 6. Februar 1996 verabschiedet. Sein Hauptziel war die Regulierung von Pornographie im Internet.… … Deutsch Wikipedia
Doe v. MySpace — Citation 528 F.3d 413 (5th Cir. 2008). Judges Edith Brown Clement, William Lockhart Garwood, and Jennifer Walker Elrod Decided … Wikipedia
List of United States courts of appeals cases — Every year, each of the eleven United States courts of appeals decides hundreds of cases. Of those, a few are so important that they later become models for decisions of other circuits, and of the United States Supreme Court, while others are… … Wikipedia
Barrett v. Rosenthal — [40 Cal.4th 33, 146 P.3d 510, 51 Cal.Rptr.3d 55 (Cal. Sup. Ct., Nov. 20, 2006).] is a 2006 California Supreme Court case concerning Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.Supreme Court of the State of California, Alameda County, Barrett v … Wikipedia
United States defamation law — The origins of United States defamation law pre date the American Revolution; one famous 1734 case involving John Peter Zenger established some precedent that the truth should be an absolute defense against libel charges. (Previous English… … Wikipedia
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act — of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet legislation in the United States. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an interactive computer… … Wikipedia
AOL — For other uses, see AOL (disambiguation). AOL Inc. Type Public company Traded as NYSE: AOL … Wikipedia
