Noopolitik

Noopolitik

Noopolitik is a type of politik that differs from realpolitik. Although realpolitik is commonly equated with hard power, and seemingly noopolitik with soft power, both are broader in their embodiment of a form of organization. Specifically, realpolitik is not limited to hard power and coercion, but embodies a hierarchical form of organization. Likewise, noopolitik is not limited to reliance on knowledge and soft power, but embodies a networked form of organization. The idea was originally presented by American information warfare researchers John Arquilla and David Ronfeldt.

Tiziana Terranova (2007) describes the use of the term 'noopolitics' by Maurizio Lazzarato (2004). "'Noopolitics' supplements the biopolitics of the species described by Foucault" (Terranova 2007, 139). "Against the militarization of communication accomplished by new techniques of power, it is possible to think about the constitution of such publics as counter-weapons, which work by expressing, inventing and creating possible worlds where the moment of resistance (the 'no' by which one refuses to watch, listen or believe) is the starting point for an affirmative activity" (Terranova 2007, 140).

Contents

the Knowledge Economy and the BRICS

While the term initially appeared in association with the concept of the US Revolution in Military Affairs, Noopolitik has also come to describe an interest in the Knowledge Economy and in particular innovation and R&D to leverage growth and political reach in international relations. Thus Noopolitik may be defined as the use of innovation and knowledge to leverage political intercourses by other means at the international level. Such "knowledge race" may be either a means of asserting political independence or of generating a sudden gap in the geopolitical balance of power. The attitude of the People's Republic of China and the ANZUS in the Pacific Ocean has been described as such.

Therefore, comparable to the Heartland, the “Heartocean” inevitably disputed by powers of which none may prevail alone in the future without a decisive innovation will become the scene of a commensurate Great Game with the two same grand stakes. This will be the fate (or doom) of multilateralism on the one side and the global knowledge race on the other. (...). As stated by Seth Cropsey (2010) commenting on China’s noopolitik move of deploying new anti-ship missiles[1] in the ocean “keeping the Pacific pacific”[2]. The two issues are well summarized.[3] --- Idriss J. Aberkane March 2011

Noopolitik has thus been described as a defining stance of the People's Republic of China's economic policy[4]. Aberkane thus analyzes " Maintaining “Leap and Bound” creativity could be an efficient way for China to neutralize popular frustration. What must be acknowledged is that the PRC has moved from a “growth panacea” policy, to a policy of “knowledge panacea.” This best sums up its Noopolitik."

Emphasizing China’s deeply-rooted desire for technological independence, Segal[5] refers to the PRC’s efforts as an “Innovation Wall,” which is the willingness to innovate as independently as possible from the rest of the world to simply and systematically leap ahead of any other country. Needless to say, the scope of the rising fog of war in world economic and R&D competition is particularly daunting for the Euro-Atlantic community. The Chinese phrase for national innovation zizhu chuangxin was notably coined in a 2006 state report titled “Guidelines on National Medium- and Long-Term Program for Science and Technology Development.” If China decides to foster an innovation of its own, and the ideas were published in Mandarin language journals it would provide a barrier against other linguistic communities, and a thicker fog of war might rise in knowledge-based economic warfare -- Idriss J. Aberkane, 2011

see also Economics of the People's Republic of China : Noopolitik and the Knowledge Economy

See also

Sources

  1. ^ Fox News.com Aug. 6th 2010 Chinese 'Carrier-Killer' Missile Could Reshape Sea Combat [link | http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/08/06/chinese-carrier-killer-missile-game-changer-expert-says/]
  2. ^ Seth Cropsey Keeping the Pacific pacific. The looming U.S.-Chinese Naval rivalry. Foreign Affairs Sept. 27 2010.
  3. ^ Aberkane, I. J. Brzezinski on a US Berezina: anticipating a new, New World Order e-International Relations Mar 31st 2011
  4. ^ Aberkane, Idriss J. An Optimistic Memo on the Chinese Noopolitik: 2001-2011 e-International Relations jun. 14 2011
  5. ^ Segal, A. (2010) China’s Innovation Wall : Beijing’s Push for Homegrown technology. Foreign Affairs Sept 28 2010.

Additional Resources



Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Economy of the People's Republic of China — Economies of Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau are administered separately from the rest of People s Republic of China. Therefore, the information below pertains only to mainland China unless specified otherwise. For the… …   Wikipedia

  • The New Great Game — For the book: The New Great Game: Blood and Oil in Central Asia , see Lutz Kleveman. Central Asia The New Great Game is a term used to describe the conceptualization of modern geopolitics in Central Eurasia as a competition between the United… …   Wikipedia

  • Realpolitik — (German: de. real “realistic”, “practical” or “actual”; and de. Politik “politics”) refers to politics or diplomacy based primarily on practical considerations, rather than ideological notions. The term realpolitik is often used pejoratively to… …   Wikipedia

  • Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's letter to George W. Bush — On May 8, 2006, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sent a missive directly to then United States President George W. Bush that proposed new ways to end the dispute over the Islamic Republic s development of nuclear power. Contents 1 2006… …   Wikipedia

  • Netpolitik — is an emerging type diplomacy that differs from realpolitik. In 2002, the Aspen Institute convened a three day conference in Aspen, Colorado to explore the meaning of netpolitik and how the internet is changing the powers of the nation state,… …   Wikipedia

  • Centre d'études diplomatiques et stratégiques — Centre d’études diplomatiques et stratégiques Paris CEDS Nom original CEDS organisme créé sous l égide de l École des hautes études internationales Informations Fondation 1986 à partir de l École des hautes études internationales Fondateur Pascal …   Wikipédia en Français

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”