Mackeigan v. Hickman

Mackeigan v. Hickman

SCCInfoBox
case-name=Mackeigan v. Hickman
full-case-name=
heard-date=
decided-date=October 5, 1989
citations=
docket=21315
docket2=21351
history=from NS Court of Appeal
ruling= Appeal dismissed
ratio=
SCC=1988-1989
Majority=McLachlin J.
JoinMajority=L'Heureux‑Dubé and Gonthier JJ.
Concurrence=Lamer J.
Concurrence2=La Forest J.
Concurrence/Dissent=Wilson J.
Concurrence/Dissent2=Cory J.
NotParticipating=Dickson C.J.
LawsApplied=

"Mackeigan v. Hickman", [1989] 2 S.C.R. 796 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on judicial independence. The Court unanimously held that to require a federal judge to explain their decisions would violate the principle of judicial independence.

Background

Donald Marshall was an Aboriginal youth who was wrongly convicted of murder in 1971. In 1983, the federal government, on the basis of new evidence, referred the case to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal who overturned the conviction.

The panel which heard the reference included Justice Pace who was the Attorney General of Nova Scotia at the time of the investigation in 1971. At the end of the Court's judgement it was observed that Marshall was largely at fault for his own conviction by misleading the investigation and that "any miscarriage of justice was more apparent than real". This comment had a major effect on the amount of settlement Marshall received.

In 1986, the Nova Scotia government established a royal commission, under the "Public Inquiries Act", to investigate the handling of the Marshall case. As part of the investigation the Commission tried to compel the judges on the reference, including Pace, to testify. The judges applied for a declaration that the Commission had no authority to compel them as they were protected by judicial immunity.

The Supreme Court considered two issues:
# whether ss. 3 and 4 of the Public Inquiries Act could be used to compel superior court judges to testify before the Commission, either with respect to how and why they reached their decision or with respect to the composition of the panel that heard the case.
# whether the direction to the Commission to inquire into a reference by the Minister of Justice was ultra vires the Province because it is a matter of criminal law and procedure reserved exclusively to the federal Parliament under s. 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The majority held that the judges could not be compelled and that the direction to the Commission was not "ultra vires" the province.

Reasons of the Court

Three reasons were written for the majority.

Justice McLachlin, writing for L'Heureux-Dubé and Gonthier, held that,:"the judge's right to refuse to answer to the executive or legislative branches of government or their appointees as to how and why the judge arrived at a particular judicial conclusion is essential to the personal independence of the judge…To entertain the demand that a judge testify before a civil body, or emanation of the legislature or executive, on how and why he or she made his or her decision would be to strike at the most sacrosanct core of judicial independence"

ee also

* List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)
* Valente v. The Queen
* Beauregard v. Canada
* R. v. Généreux
* Provincial Judges Reference
* Therrien (Re)
* Provincial Court Judges' Assn. of New Brunswick v. New Brunswick (Minister of Justice)

External links

*


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Hickman — may refer to:People with the surname Hickman or Hickmann: * Hickman (surname)In places: * Hickman County, Kentucky * Hickman County, Tennessee * Hickman, California * Hickman, Kentucky * Hickman, Maryland * Hickman, Nebraska * David H. Hickman… …   Wikipedia

  • Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Chief Justice McLachlin — The following is a list of Supreme Court of Canada opinions written by Beverley McLachlin during her tenure on the Court. Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin on November 20, 2007 Contents 1 …   Wikipedia

  • Her Majesty's Government — Her Majesty s Government, or when the monarch is male, His Majesty s Government, is the title used by the Government of the United Kingdom, based at 10 Downing Street; and formerly also by the governments of other Commonwealth realms.According to …   Wikipedia

  • Donald Marshall, Jr. — Donald Marshall, Jr. Born 13 September 1953(1953 09 13) Died 6 August 2009(2009 08 06) (aged 55) Known for wrongful murder conviction Donald Marshall, Jr. (13 September 1953 …   Wikipedia

  • Provincial Judges Reference — ! bgcolor= 6699FF | Case opinions |The Provincial Judges Reference [the three formal titles of the decision are Manitoba Provincial Judges Assn. v. Manitoba (Minister of Justice) from the Manitoba appeal, R. v. Campbell; R. v. Ekmecic; R. v.… …   Wikipedia

  • Valente v. The Queen — ! bgcolor= 6699FF | Case opinions Valente v. The Queen , [1985] 2 S.C.R. 673 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on protection of judicial independence under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. BackgroundA… …   Wikipedia

  • R. v. Généreux — SCCInfoBox case name=R. v. Généreux full case name=Michel Généreux v. Her Majesty The Queen heard date=June 5, 1991 decided date=February 13, 1992 citations= [1992] 1 S.C.R. 259 history=appeal from the court martial appeal court of canada ruling …   Wikipedia

  • Therrien (Re) — [2001] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2001 SCC 35, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on judicial independence.BackgroundIn the 1970 s Richard Therrien was convicted of assisting four members of the Front de libération du Québec during the Octobe …   Wikipedia

  • Provincial Court Judges' Assn. of New Brunswick v. New Brunswick (Minister of Justice) — Supreme Court of Canada Hearing: November 9 10, 2004 Judgment: Decided July 22, 2005 …   Wikipedia

  • Beauregard v. Canada — ! bgcolor= 6699FF | Case opinions Beauregard v. Canada [1986] 2 S.C.R. 56 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on judicial independence. Notably, the Court found that judicial independence is based partly in an unwritten constitution,… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”