Overbreadth doctrine

Overbreadth doctrine

In American jurisprudence, the overbreadth doctrine is primarily concerned with facial challenges to laws under the First Amendment. American courts have recognized several exceptions to the speech protected by the First Amendment (for example, obscenity, fighting words, and libel or defamation), and states therefore have some latitude to regulate unprotected speech. A statute doing so is overly broad (hence, overbreadth) if, in proscribing unprotected speech, it also proscribes protected speech. Because an overly broad law may deter constitutionally protected speech, the overbreadth doctrine allows a party to whom the law may constitutionally be applied to challenge the statute on the ground that it violates the First Amendment rights of others. See, e.g., Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y. v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469, 483 (1989), and R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992). Overbreadth is closely related to vagueness; if a prohibition is expressed in a way that is too unclear for a person to reasonably know whether or not their conduct falls within the law, then to avoid the risk of legal consequences they often stay far away from anything that could possibly fit the uncertain wording of the law. The law's effects are thereby far broader than intended or than the Constitution permits, and hence the law is overbroad.

The “strong medicine” of overbreadth invalidation need not and generally should not be administered when the statute under attack is unconstitutional as applied to the challenger before the court. See U.S. v. Stevens, 130 S.Ct. 1577, 1592 (Alito, J., dissenting). The overbreadth doctrine is to “strike a balance between competing social costs.” U.S. v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285, 292. Specifically, the doctrine seeks to balance the “harmful effects” of “invalidating a law that in some of its applications is perfectly constitutional” as a possibility that “the threat of enforcement of an overbroad law deters people from engaging in constitutionally protected speech.” Ibid.

In determining whether a statute's overbreadth is substantial, the courts consider a statute's application to real-world conduct, not fanciful hypotheticals. See, for example, id., at 301-302. Accordingly, the courts have repeatedly emphasized that an overbreadth claimant bears the burden of demonstrating, “from the text of [the law] and from actual fact” that substantial overbreadth exists. Virginia v. Hicks, 539 U.S. 113 (2003). Similarly, “there must be a realistic danger that the statute itself will significantly compromise recognized First Amendment protections of parties not before the Court for it to be facially challenged on overbreadth grounds.” Members of City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 801 (1984).

Lewis Sargentich first analyzed and named the doctrine in his famous note in the Harvard Law Review, The First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine (83 Harv. L. Rev. 844). Then, citing Sargentich's note, the Supreme Court in Broadrick v. Oklahoma explicitly recognized the doctrine in 1973.

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • overbreadth doctrine — A principle of judicial review that holds that a law is invalid if it punishes constitutionally protected speech or conduct along with speech or conduct that the government may limit to further a compelling government interest. Dictionary from… …   Law dictionary

  • overbreadth doctrine — This doctrine, which derives from First Amendment, serves to invalidate legislation so sweeping that, along with its allowable proscriptions, it also restricts constitutionally protected rights of free speech, press or assembly. McCrary v. State …   Black's law dictionary

  • overbreadth — over·breadth /ˌō vər bredth, bretth; ō vər ˌ/ n 1: the quality or state of being overbroad a statute void for overbreadth 2: a doctrine in constitutional law: a law that prohibits protected conduct (as free speech) as part of its reach may be… …   Law dictionary

  • Facial challenge — In the context of American jurisprudence, a facial challenge is a challenge to a statute in court, in which the plaintiff alleges that the legislation is always, and under all circumstances, unconstitutional, and therefore void. It is contrasted… …   Wikipedia

  • United States v. Salerno — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants = United States v. Salerno ArgueDate = January 21 ArgueYear = 1987 DecideDate = May 26 DecideYear = 1987 FullName = United States v. Salerno USVol = 481 USPage = 739 Citation = Prior = Subsequent = Holding = Given… …   Wikipedia

  • Third party standing — is a term of the law of civil procedure that describes when one party may file a lawsuit on behalf of another party. In the United States, this is generally prohibited, as a party can only assert his or her own rights and cannot raise the claims… …   Wikipedia

  • Controle de constitutionnalite — Contrôle de constitutionnalité Le contrôle de constitutionnalité est un contrôle juridictionnel pour s assurer que les normes de droit interne (loi, règlement), mais également externe (traité) respectent la Constitution, qui est placée au sommet… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Contrôle De Constitutionnalité — Le contrôle de constitutionnalité est un contrôle juridictionnel pour s assurer que les normes de droit interne (loi, règlement), mais également externe (traité) respectent la Constitution, qui est placée au sommet de la hiérarchie des normes.… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Contrôle constitutionnel — Contrôle de constitutionnalité Le contrôle de constitutionnalité est un contrôle juridictionnel pour s assurer que les normes de droit interne (loi, règlement), mais également externe (traité) respectent la Constitution, qui est placée au sommet… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Contrôle de constitutionnalité — Le contrôle de constitutionnalité est un contrôle juridictionnel pour s assurer que les normes de droit interne (loi, règlement), mais également externe (traité) respectent la Constitution, qui est placée au sommet de la hiérarchie des normes. On …   Wikipédia en Français

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”