R. v. Keegstra

R. v. Keegstra

SCCInfoBox
case-name=R. v. Keegstra
full-case-name=Her Majesty The Queen v. James Keegstra
heard-date=December 5, 6, 1989
decided-date=December 13, 1990
citations= [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697
ruling=The appeal should be allowed.
docket=21118
ratio=
SCC=1989-1990
Majority=Dickson C.J.
JoinMajority=Wilson, L'Heureux-Dubé and Gonthier JJ.
Dissent=McLachlin J.
JoinDissent=Sopinka J.
NotParticipating=
LawsApplied=Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec (Attorney General) (1989); R. v. Whyte, (1988); R. v. Oakes, (1986); R. v. Morgentaler, (1988); Rocket v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario, (1990)

"R. v. Keegstra", [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697 is a landmark freedom of expression decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court upheld the Criminal Code of Canada provision prohibiting the wilfull promotion of hatred against an identifiable group as constitutional under the freedom of expression provision in section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Background

James Keegstra was a high school teacher in Eckville, Alberta. In 1984, he was charged under section 281.2(2) of the Criminal Code [now 319(2)] for "promoting hatred against an identifiable group by communicating anti-semitic statements to his students". During class, he would describe Jews as a people of profound evil who had "created the Holocaust to gain sympathy". As well, he tested his students on exams on his theories and opinion of Jews.

Keegstra had applied to have the charge quashed for violation of his freedom of expression; however, this motion was denied and he was eventually convicted at trial.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) and section 11(d)of the Charter and, if so, whether it could be saved under section 1.

Reasons of the Court

The Court found that section 319 clearly violated section 2(b) as it was legislation designed to suppress expression. In this, the Court wrote that freedom of expression within section 2 would not be limited by section 15 (equality rights) and section 27 (recognition of multiculturalism) of the Charter. As the Court explained, using sections 15 and 27 in this way would contradict "the large and liberal interpretation given the freedom of expression in Irwin Toy" and moreover, "s. 1 of the Charter is especially well suited to the task of balancing."

The Court found that the violation of freedom of expression was justified under section 1 as the law had a rational connection to its objective, it was not overly limiting, and the seriousness of the violation was not severe as the content of the hateful expression has little value to protect.

Aftermath

The case provided precedent for other freedom of expression and hate speech cases. In "R. v. Butler" (1992), a case considering laws against obscenity, the Supreme Court cited "Keegstra" to note that freedom of expression should be interpreted generously and was infringed in that case. In another hate speech case, "R. v. Krymowski" (2005), the Court noted that "Keegstra" had demonstrated hate speech laws were constitutional. Building on expectations that there must be evidence of promotion of hatred against a group, the Court added in "Krymowski" that courts should then consider the "totality of the evidence" to conclude whether a group had fallen victim to hate speech.

ee also

*List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)

External links

*


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • James Keegstra — James Jim Keegstra is a figure on the far right of Canadian politics and former public school teacher. In 1984, Keegstra was charged and convicted of hate speech, a conviction that was overturned by the Court of Appeal but re instated by the… …   Wikipedia

  • Holocaust denial — Antisemitism Part of Jewish history …   Wikipedia

  • Harvey Lainson — Harvey George Lainson (born ca. 1935 February 28 2005) was a Christian evangelical minister based in the Cambridge, Ontario region and was leader of the Social Credit Party of Canada from 1986 to 1990 during which time he led a successful effort… …   Wikipedia

  • Social Credit Party of Canada — Parti Crédit social du Canada Former federal party Founded 1935 ( …   Wikipedia

  • Ken Sweigard — (1919 July 11, 2005) was a Pentecostal evangelist from Grande Prairie, Alberta, and politician who led the Social Credit Party of Canada from 1983 to 1986. In the 1980 election, Social Credit s five remaining Members of Parliament (all from… …   Wikipedia

  • ALBERTA — ALBERTA, province in Western Canada. Alberta boasts Canada s fourth largest provincial population, with over 3.2 million people (July 2004). Its two major cities are Edmonton, the provincial capital, with approximately 5,500 Jews, and Calgary,… …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • Doug Christie (lawyer) — Doug Christie Leader of the Western Block Party Incumbent Assumed office November 20, 2005 Preceded by First Leader Personal details Born …   Wikipedia

  • Martin Hattersley — Leader of the Social Credit Party of Canada In office 1981–1983 Preceded by Fabien Roy Succeeded by Ken Sweigard Personal d …   Wikipedia

  • Les Scheininger — Lester Scheininger is a Jewish community leader, politician and lawyer in Ontario, Canada. He is best known for serving as president of the Canadian Jewish Congress from 1989 to 1992. Scheininger campaigned for the Legislative Assembly of Ontario …   Wikipedia

  • Nationalist Party of Canada — The Nationalist Party of Canada is an unregistered Canadian political party that was founded in 1977 by Don Andrews (born Vilim Zlomislic), who continues as leader of the party. The purported goals of the party are the promotion and maintenance… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”